2012 GL350 question in regards to handling

I went from a 2007 Escalade ESV to a 2011 GL350. They are night-and-day different. The Escalade is a truck and it handles like one. "Lumbering" is the word that comes to mind. Also, the Escalade, for as nice as the interior bits mostly are, always felt like every piece was vibrating in a slightly different direction than every other piece.
The GL350 is a vault and it feels like one. The handling is much taughter and more direct. Stuff happens when you turn the wheel.

And here's the part that is really shocking: the GL is a much better tow vehicle. I didn't expect that, but the overly-soft suspension of the 'Slade (to compensate for the floppy chassis structure) really compromises its towing.
- Mark
I haven't had an escalade, but I did recently own a GMC Yukon Denali which is pretty much the same platform. Spongy is the only definition I have for their suspension.
And in question of refinement and features, no comparision with a Benz.
Best vehicle I have ever owned.

And yeah, spongy. This is why body-on-frame vehicles blow, in spite of what the big SUV guys will tell you. It's 2011 already, people.

- Mark
Trending Topics
http://www.benzonly.com/article22.aspx
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

http://www.benzonly.com/article22.aspx

I totally agree with what you said in regards to the escalade. I may have to wait until 2013 to see if they allow for a spare tire since I do not want run flats and just realized run-flats are standard now on these GL's.
Furthermore, here's another reason not to buy an Escalade (unless you are a rapper). Check out the video on this story: http://www.autoblog.com/2010/11/16/v...easy-target-f/
Last edited by FastMoneyPlaya; Nov 22, 2011 at 08:32 PM.
Actually, no. That was true of the first-gen Escalade, but the current generation actually has bespoke body panels.
It's still a Suburban underneath, though.
- Mark







