Are you glad that you purchased a GLC? Any regrets?
Remember however that the majority of GLC owners don't join forums like these. I would bet there are a lot of forum members here that joined because they have an issue or problem or are car enthusiasts. So, statistically, opinions here may be biased.
Remember however that the majority of GLC owners don't join forums like these. I would bet there are a lot of forum members here that joined because they have an issue or problem or are car enthusiasts. So, statistically, opinions here may be biased.
As far as reliability, only time will tell. But Jaguar does not have a good reputation for reliability and I believe Audi is far less than MB and Audi is tied up with VW on the diesel EPA fraud issue.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I think for 2017 they are releasing a 4 cylinder turbo. 47000k base msrp.
If I could have waited I would have considered getting a minimal equipped one.
So far the car has been good but still too early in terms of reliability.
Regardless on how it was ranked, I got a GLC anyways. The porche cayenne was rated quite reliable. Mercedes didn't have any major engine/drive train issues. I think most of it's issues were electronic. Also, it seems like there's a difference depending where the cars are built (ie a german MB factory vs a USA MB factory). I think the MB USA factories had some quailty control issues on the C-class.
Any safety system fault will leave you stranded.
Another rating site to look at is JD-Power. They have 2 sets of ratings. One for predicted reliability done wtihin 1 year of the vehicle and another for dependence survey done 3 years after.
but from what I understand, they've gotten better.
Mercedes are Mercedes and built to be Mercedes, not shared across numerous sub-brands from a vast parts bin, e.g., VW, Audi, Porsche.







