Rear Camber Bolts




On the GLS with the staggered wheels, the rear tires last 25k miles with normal usage. This is on the 450 model, Michelin all-season tires, nothing too fancy. That doesn't necessarily bother me. But I do notice how jiggly the car can get sometimes on the horizontal axis in the rear. For instance, drive over a lane strip that has a some moisture on it, and the car wants to slide over it from the rear, meaning the other side of the car is pushing it horizontal. Happens all the time. Car is perfectly aligned as well. So I figure it's the alignment setting itself, and knowing how MB (and German cars in general) seem to like that negative camber, I thought I might see if there were a fix to make it not do that so much. I understand why they do it that way, the stability factor at high speeds by design, autobahn thinking. But we're never going to drive a GLS like that in general, and don't need it. Would much prefer a straight and flat ride.
So, just curious if anyone on the GLE side of the family has corrected their rear alignment settings to take that aspect out of the ride characteristics, and if so, how?
Thanks!

I would lower the rear tire pressure two pounds at a time while staying within the recommended pressures and see if the symptom changes.




Would be nice if the tires rolled straight forward and the stability factor were on the width of the tire alone (which is massive at 315). No added force from the alignment factor.
On the GLS with the staggered wheels, the rear tires last 25k miles with normal usage. This is on the 450 model, Michelin all-season tires, nothing too fancy. That doesn't necessarily bother me. But I do notice how jiggly the car can get sometimes on the horizontal axis in the rear. For instance, drive over a lane strip that has a some moisture on it, and the car wants to slide over it from the rear, meaning the other side of the car is pushing it horizontal. Happens all the time. Car is perfectly aligned as well. So I figure it's the alignment setting itself, and knowing how MB (and German cars in general) seem to like that negative camber, I thought I might see if there were a fix to make it not do that so much. I understand why they do it that way, the stability factor at high speeds by design, autobahn thinking. But we're never going to drive a GLS like that in general, and don't need it. Would much prefer a straight and flat ride.
So, just curious if anyone on the GLE side of the family has corrected their rear alignment settings to take that aspect out of the ride characteristics, and if so, how?
Thanks!




It's also what keeps the rear end from being "nervous."
I agree that more camber causes inside shoulder wear, but I'll take that trade-off when I want to change direction without scaring myself or passengers. I'd feel very unsafe if I had to tiptoe around, hoping the tail doesn't squirt out in a bend. Zero camber would be extremely unsafe. I'd be driving UNDER the posted corner caution speeds. Not 20 over.
What the OP is talking about is "tramlining," Wider, lower profile tires are more susceptible, and tire pressure is the most likely remedy, or a change in tire brands. Not camber adjustments.




https://www.youtube.com/@USAutoIndustry/videos
Last edited by E55Greasemonkey; Jan 16, 2023 at 09:45 PM.
Trending Topics
I tried to align the rear but negative camber can't be reduced, even with the eccentric bolts.
Left -2.02
Right -2.35 (out of spec)
One technician said that the rear springs are worn and that's the reason for the rear tires to move further negative from the original specs.
Is he right? should I consider to replace the rear springs?
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
On the GLS with the staggered wheels, the rear tires last 25k miles with normal usage. This is on the 450 model, Michelin all-season tires, nothing too fancy. That doesn't necessarily bother me. But I do notice how jiggly the car can get sometimes on the horizontal axis in the rear. For instance, drive over a lane strip that has a some moisture on it, and the car wants to slide over it from the rear, meaning the other side of the car is pushing it horizontal. Happens all the time. Car is perfectly aligned as well. So I figure it's the alignment setting itself, and knowing how MB (and German cars in general) seem to like that negative camber, I thought I might see if there were a fix to make it not do that so much. I understand why they do it that way, the stability factor at high speeds by design, autobahn thinking. But we're never going to drive a GLS like that in general, and don't need it. Would much prefer a straight and flat ride.
So, just curious if anyone on the GLE side of the family has corrected their rear alignment settings to take that aspect out of the ride characteristics, and if so, how?
Thanks!




The attachment shows the specs for my car.
I asked about adjustable links / bushings and the response is in the linked post.
I tried to align the rear but negative camber can't be reduced, even with the eccentric bolts.
Left -2.02
Right -2.35 (out of spec)
One technician said that the rear springs are worn and that's the reason for the rear tires to move further negative from the original specs.
Is he right? should I consider to replace the rear springs?
I recently picked up a CPO 2024 GLE450. Had to take it back a few days later to do a transmission update due to jerkiness during downshift. After it was completed, the tech sent me a video with an overall inspection of the car and noted that my right rear was at 4/32 and the left rear was at 5/32. During my search for a CPO GLE, I was told that in order for any vehicle to pass inspection and become CPO, it needs to have a minimum tread depth of 5/32 or higher, so I brought this up to my service advisor and they replaced my right rear for free. I went and purchased a new left rear from Discount Tire. He also mentioned that for some reason the 450s wore faster in the rear right. He's not sure why, but he's seen it before.



