GLE Class (V167) Produced 2020 to present

Will there be a new generation of the GLE?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-02-2023, 10:54 PM
  #51  
Member
 
Aggie57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: SoCal
Posts: 208
Received 78 Likes on 53 Posts
2021 GLE 350, 2020 911 C2S MT, 2023 Polestar 2, '73 Alfa GTV
Originally Posted by TexAg91

Yep, that’s the vehicle to Grid concept. Charge your EV at night when there’s excess capacity and electricity is cheap. Sell sell some back to the utility during peak demand when it’s expensive and offset the cost of charging it at night.

Is anyone actually doing that yet? Are they mandating it or are they incentivizing it? Don’t like the concept of a mandate, but I do like the concept of incentivizing consumers to sell some of that excess capacity in their battery back to the utility during peak demand.
https://www.sdgenews.com/article/sdg...e-grid-project
Old 11-03-2023, 02:50 AM
  #52  
Super Member
 
HAILERS2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: North Texas
Posts: 505
Received 63 Likes on 58 Posts
Presently 19 S560 SEDAN, 2014 XK, SOLD GLE 450e
Jesus H Christ. Filling up a car like a GLS/GLE once in gosh knows how many days is something that troubles you? Get a life.
I've owned two Tesla S Models and now own a EQS. They are go nowhere cars other than regional cars. EQS to soon be history come Jan '24.
Old 11-03-2023, 09:15 AM
  #53  
Super Member
 
Lucky 777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 574
Received 331 Likes on 174 Posts
2023 GLE 450 4matic
Originally Posted by TexAg91
Yes, but we also subsidize gas. Let’s face it if there wasn’t oil in the Middle East (that supply affects the global market ) we would care less about it. If OPEC can jack with the supply, we can jack with demand by driving an EV.
The United States was energy independent and a net exporter of fossil fuels until the current administration shut down production in the name of climate change. The power and influence OPEC has was handed to them on a silver platter in 2021.
The following users liked this post:
HotRodW (11-03-2023)
Old 11-03-2023, 09:45 AM
  #54  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ron.s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Boise
Posts: 3,354
Received 1,023 Likes on 694 Posts
2024 Mercedes GLE 63 S..... 2018 Audi SQ5
Originally Posted by Lucky 777
The United States was energy independent and a net exporter of fossil fuels until the current administration shut down production in the name of climate change. The power and influence OPEC has was handed to them on a silver platter in 2021.
That’s a good point and we aren’t subsidizing Fossil by any normal definition, just the opposite. By limiting supply we have placed a premium on Fossil at the expense of US citizens. in the US. We are subsidizing the mandated Ethanol addition.
California has some of the most expensive electricity in the lower 48. California has inadequate power supply at times and has no consequential new sources of additional electricity generation planned. California had to postpone the shutdown of a Nuclear Plant because of the lack of supply. They are mandating BEV’s with no discernible source of new Electricity except to purchase it from an outside source…if it’s available. Discussing charging an EV at off peak power rates as any solution gives me a headache…because the off peak power is too expensive…because it’s California.
No sane person with any sense of the Financial outcome makes these lopsided decisions with their money. It’s not about the BEV being better or worse than an ICE. It’s about making decisions without solutions…decisions that have consequences.
The following 2 users liked this post by Ron.s:
HotRodW (11-03-2023), Lucky 777 (11-03-2023)
Old 11-03-2023, 11:23 AM
  #55  
Super Member
 
Lucky 777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 574
Received 331 Likes on 174 Posts
2023 GLE 450 4matic
Originally Posted by Ron.s
That’s a good point and we aren’t subsidizing Fossil by any normal definition, just the opposite. By limiting supply we have placed a premium on Fossil at the expense of US citizens. in the US. We are subsidizing the mandated Ethanol addition.
California has some of the most expensive electricity in the lower 48. California has inadequate power supply at times and has no consequential new sources of additional electricity generation planned. California had to postpone the shutdown of a Nuclear Plant because of the lack of supply. They are mandating BEV’s with no discernible source of new Electricity except to purchase it from an outside source…if it’s available. Discussing charging an EV at off peak power rates as any solution gives me a headache…because the off peak power is too expensive…because it’s California.
No sane person with any sense of the Financial outcome makes these lopsided decisions with their money. It’s not about the BEV being better or worse than an ICE. It’s about making decisions without solutions…decisions that have consequences.
Very well said!
Old 11-03-2023, 02:51 PM
  #56  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mikapen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,711
Received 1,565 Likes on 1,151 Posts
'21 AMG53 wDPP & ARC, 19 GLC300 - Former- 10&14 ML BlueTecs, 20 GLE450 E-ABC, 15 Cayenne D, 17 Macan
Originally Posted by Ron.s
That’s a good point and we aren’t subsidizing Fossil by any normal definition, just the opposite. By limiting supply we have placed a premium on Fossil at the expense of US citizens. in the US. We are subsidizing the mandated Ethanol addition.
........
No sane person with any sense of the Financial outcome makes these lopsided decisions with their money. It’s not about the BEV being better or worse than an ICE. It’s about making decisions without solutions…decisions that have consequences.
Add to that the Administration's mishandling of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, reducing it to dangerously low levels, selling low and buying high, driving up oil prices for all to enjoy.
Makes you wonder if they are really that inept, or are they trying to dissuade us from buying their sworn enemy, the ICE.
(Don't let the voters know.)(Thanks, media!)
Old 11-03-2023, 09:31 PM
  #57  
Super Member
 
TexAg91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 787
Received 402 Likes on 256 Posts
2020 Mercedes GLE350 4Matic; 2023 Tesla Model Y
Originally Posted by HAILERS2
Jesus H Christ. Filling up a car like a GLS/GLE once in gosh knows how many days is something that troubles you? Get a life.
I've owned two Tesla S Models and now own a EQS. They are go nowhere cars other than regional cars. EQS to soon be history come Jan '24.
??? Who was that addressed to —me ???

If it was—that’s not what I said . I said recharging my Tesla and having it fully charged in my garage with temp at 70 deg when I get it it every morning for my 130 mile round trip commute is more convenient (for me) than having to stop at a Costco every 3 days and fill up.

That is my opinion/experience, you may agree with it or not.

Last edited by TexAg91; 11-03-2023 at 09:49 PM.
Old 11-03-2023, 10:30 PM
  #58  
Super Member
 
TexAg91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 787
Received 402 Likes on 256 Posts
2020 Mercedes GLE350 4Matic; 2023 Tesla Model Y
Interesting, so they are paying $2/KWh to purchase electricity during peak demand/emergencies. So if you could spare/sell 10 KWh (~30 miles of EV range), that would likely cover the cost to fully recharge the battery overnight where there is excess grid capacity.

Will be interesting to see how this "pilot" plays out.
Old 11-03-2023, 10:55 PM
  #59  
Super Member
 
TexAg91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 787
Received 402 Likes on 256 Posts
2020 Mercedes GLE350 4Matic; 2023 Tesla Model Y
Originally Posted by Lucky 777
The United States was energy independent and a net exporter of fossil fuels until the current administration shut down production in the name of climate change. The power and influence OPEC has was handed to them on a silver platter in 2021.
True, but not enough to make up the difference if OPEC cuts production to reduce global supply and raise the market price.

Demand for petroleum is relatively inelastic in the short term. It's not a true market, oil is a strategic asset that is controlled by Nation States that do not share strategic interests.

Last edited by TexAg91; 11-04-2023 at 08:47 AM.
The following users liked this post:
mikapen (11-04-2023)
Old 11-04-2023, 12:03 AM
  #60  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
wildta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Posts: 1,583
Received 583 Likes on 430 Posts
MB
Originally Posted by TexAg91
Interesting, so they are paying $2/KWh to purchase electricity during peak demand/emergencies. So if you could spare/sell 10 KWh (~30 miles of EV range), that would likely cover the cost to fully recharge the battery overnight where there is excess grid capacity.

Will be interesting to see how this "pilot" plays out.
San Diegans have the highest kW costs in the country, only second to Hawaii.
https://www.bls.gov/regions/midwest/...reas_table.htm
Old 11-04-2023, 12:21 AM
  #61  
Super Member
 
TexAg91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 787
Received 402 Likes on 256 Posts
2020 Mercedes GLE350 4Matic; 2023 Tesla Model Y
Originally Posted by wildta
San Diegans have the highest kW costs in the country, only second to Hawaii.
https://www.bls.gov/regions/midwest/...reas_table.htm
Wow, $.50 KWh (rounded)....yes...I prefer to watch this "pilot program" from afar.
Old 11-04-2023, 02:01 AM
  #62  
Member
 
Aggie57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: SoCal
Posts: 208
Received 78 Likes on 53 Posts
2021 GLE 350, 2020 911 C2S MT, 2023 Polestar 2, '73 Alfa GTV
Originally Posted by TexAg91
Wow, $.50 KWh (rounded)....yes...I prefer to watch this "pilot program" from afar.
Seems to me this pilot, like most similar ones around the world, is more about proving the concept and learning than making a financial case. There’s other similar exercises in several parts of the world.
Old 11-04-2023, 01:48 PM
  #63  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mikapen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,711
Received 1,565 Likes on 1,151 Posts
'21 AMG53 wDPP & ARC, 19 GLC300 - Former- 10&14 ML BlueTecs, 20 GLE450 E-ABC, 15 Cayenne D, 17 Macan
Originally Posted by Aggie57
Seems to me this pilot, like most similar ones around the world, is more about proving the concept and learning than making a financial case. There’s other similar exercises in several parts of the world.
Let's hope they are gathering data that they will actually evaluate.

Instead of being a forced adoption, with this being the first planned step.
The following users liked this post:
TexAg91 (11-05-2023)
Old 11-04-2023, 09:44 PM
  #64  
Junior Member
 
earlvolfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 42
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
2024 AMG GLE 53, 2023 E450 Cabriolet & 2020 GLE 350
I have a 2020 GLE350, but I leased my 89 year old father the EV equivalent, the 2023 EQE350+. He's mainly a commuter and he loves the instant power to accelerate in traffic and I love the fact is doesn't allow him to run off the road or into someone else. It's a tight car and easy to drive, but I don't care for the exterior and interior styling. I understand the need to improve aerodynamics and save weight, but the exterior is bland and the interior is cheap-feeling and plasticy.

I think MB is making a serious mistake in using the same interiors in their EV and ICE models. It's the main reason I bought a 2023 E450 Cabriolet before they are discontinued in favor of the new CLE models with that ugly interior. Maybe they're figuring that out, though. I just saw an advertisement for the new GLB EV and they've retained the SUV styling similar to what we have with our GLE's.

The EV's have a place in today's market, but until improvements in battery technology and charging infrastructure take place, they'll never be able to replace the ICE marketplace.

Last edited by earlvolfan; 11-04-2023 at 09:47 PM.
Old 11-04-2023, 10:56 PM
  #65  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
benzbell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,455
Received 867 Likes on 451 Posts
2023 Urus Performante - 2021 Ferrari Roma - 2017 Ferrari 488 GTB - 2022 GLE 63 S Coupe
I can't stand the interior of the MB EVs. It's like stepping into a consumer electronics show instead of an automobile. Not to mention the piped in "Jetsons" sound and the giant Petri dish hyper screen. In all fairness I'm sure MB would rather build exciting cars like they used to. But alas they are beholden to EU regulations which in turn get their marching orders from the WEF.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Will there be a new generation of the GLE?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:21 PM.