Turbo lag on 350 vs 450
- Why did Mercedes-Benz choose to mate their PHEV 450e with a 4-cylinder instead of an inline-6? Is it price? They would probably have to charge $5-10k more to justify the added cost. Maybe they did a market study and found that potential owners don't care about 0-60 times and instead just want to reduce their gas and purchase costs?
Does AI have enough data to estimate the average MSRP of a GLE350 that is available for sale in the US ? I bet that's at or above the MSRP of a base GLE450. Of course most GLE450s get jacked up to even higher (with all kinds of unnecessary add-ons), but that's a separate aspect.




Those sport seats in the 2001/2002 WRX (essentially Japanese spec sport-seats) disappeared in 2003 and no Subaru since, has gotten it back. No iteration of the higher performance WRX STI that ever appeared in the US, has gotten a decent sport seat (other market STIs get full Recaro seats as an option, while the US market gets a weak partial Recaro). So if you go examine the current WRX seats, you will no longer find what I am talking about.
The point however, is NOT about the WRX. The point is about the 5000+lbs GLE, with a similar 2.0L Turbo 4-cylinder that the 3085lbs WRX had 2 DECADES back. Does the point now make sense ?
Either way, my last post on this topic. The point has been repeated ad nauseum.
And thank you for relenting.
Does AI have enough data to estimate the average MSRP of a GLE350 that is available for sale in the US ? I bet that's at or above the MSRP of a base GLE450. Of course most GLE450s get jacked up to even higher (with all kinds of unnecessary add-ons), but that's a separate aspect.
I would assume that it's almost impossible to find any GLE/X5 variant to have no options. Manufacturers want to sell options because each tick box gives them an additional margin.
Last edited by wildta; Dec 9, 2024 at 02:48 PM.
Crazy that people would consider buying those, than just pay a few 1000 more and just go with the overall better GLE450. Better engine, FAR better AWD system etc., in the GLE450 vs the GLE350, makes the choice a no-brainer for me personally.




.
I never took Physics but, how does better traction add up to being slower?
Last edited by Elvisfan0108; Dec 9, 2024 at 04:04 PM.




Crazy that people would consider buying those, than just pay a few 1000 more and just go with the overall better GLE450. Better engine, FAR better AWD system etc., in the GLE450 vs the GLE350, makes the choice a no-brainer for me personally.
AKA a lot more.
I think a 450 is worth it, but it's a nice savings if a 350 suits your needs. It's a popular model.
Some might call it a wise choice. Why spend the money for something you don't need?
Last edited by mikapen; Dec 9, 2024 at 04:01 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




More traction from wider tires/wheels = more grip, higher overall weight, and thus higher rolling resistance (everything else being equal). The last thing you need in a power constrained heavy vehicle, is more rolling resistance. Even the GLE450 does not need more than its 275mm wide tires, based on the power it has (375HP etc). The GLE63S can certainly benefit from the 325mm wide tires and the AWD, and it will use every bit of the grip afforded by the wider tire, to not be overpowered by the 600+HP that its engine outputs.
Last edited by wildta; Dec 9, 2024 at 05:16 PM.
- To me, a base GLE350 makes total sense, due to the price savings that come with it, especially for someone who understands the limitations of what they are buying.
- A base 450 makes total sense, and is a perfect Goldilocks option within the GLE line-up, where the price, performance and features perfectly align.
- A GLE350 that's priced similar to a base 450, due to having a bunch of expensive optional add-ons, make no sense to me. The typical GLE350 that I see being driven around.
- A 450 optioned out to 105K (or even 90K and beyond), makes zero sense to me.
Conversely, more grip is needed by a vehicle where the power being generated, is large enough to overcome the grip afforded by the tires. You need MORE grip in this case, typically with wider, grippier tires.
Conversely, more grip is needed by a vehicle where the power being generated, is large enough to overcome the grip afforded by the tires. You need MORE grip in this case, typically with wider, grippier tires.




Conversely, more grip is needed by a vehicle where the power being generated, is large enough to overcome the grip afforded by the tires. You need MORE grip in this case, typically with wider, grippier tires.
And the wheels and tires are options, not required. It's nice that they are available.




- To me, a base GLE350 makes total sense, due to the price savings that come with it, especially for someone who understands the limitations of what they are buying.
- A base 450 makes total sense, and is a perfect Goldilocks option within the GLE line-up, where the price, performance and features perfectly align.
- A GLE350 that's priced similar to a base 450, due to having a bunch of expensive optional add-ons, make no sense to me. The typical GLE350 that I see being driven around.
- A 450 optioned out to 105K (or even 90K and beyond), makes zero sense to me.
A GLE63S, will use every bit of that available contact patch, in its 325mm wide tire, since it is generating a torrent of power, and to get that power to the ground, the tires need to be wider and grippier, so that they can hook up and the vehicle can get going, rather than spinning in place.
"Spinning in place" happens when the vehicle is "tire constrained" (too much power that prevents the available tire-contact-patch from hooking up, or can also be due to the tire itself having low grip due to being worn down etc). In modern vehicles, the traction control system will immediately intervene to sort things out. In a vehicle like the original Dodge Viper, for instance, even the super wide tires it was equipped with, would just spin uncontrollably, due to the massive power/torque from its V10 engine, coupled with lack of traction control.
The GLE350 is certainly not "tire constrained", even with the standard 255mm tires on 19" wheels.




Conversely, more grip is needed by a vehicle where the power being generated, is large enough to overcome the grip afforded by the tires. You need MORE grip in this case, typically with wider, grippier tires.




Agreed. "Useless" is subjective even with data. One person's useless thing is another person's must have item.
Last edited by jkaetz; Dec 9, 2024 at 07:48 PM.
Agreed. "Useless" is subjective even with data. One person's useless thing is another person's must have item.




Edit: big staggered tires add Fun to the driving experience. No matter what the horsepower.
Last edited by mikapen; Dec 9, 2024 at 09:43 PM.




