63 Rides Better then 53
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
63 Rides Better then 53
I've read in a few places that the ride on the 63 is much smoother then the 53. First is this true and if so why would that be?
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 8,702
Received 3,990 Likes
on
2,661 Posts
2019 C63CS
Because the 63 has AMG ACTIVE RIDE CONTROL, which are active anti-roll bars. They can relax when driving straight allowing the wheels to move more independently which results in a smoother ride and tighten up when cornering. AMG ACTIVE RIDE CONTROL is optional for the 53, but no longer offered in the USA, so the 53 has fixed anti-roll bars that are a compromise between straight line comfort and roll stabilization when cornering. With tall and heavy SUVs, the anti-roll bars have to be fairly stiff to control all that body roll, so they end up either on the harsh side to keep body roll in check, or on the soft side for comfort, but then the body rolls all over in the corners. Active roll stabilization eliminates this compromise.
#3
Junior Member
I may have(probably) had this option on my 2022 GLE53 coupe and it was a great ride. My 2024 63s Coupe is even better. It may be in my head, but with the extra power, the ride is smooth and the SO has yet to complain about my driving and nausea…which I was expecting more of!!!
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
I think the new ordering guide shows the 53 as having the ARC option but maybe it's outdated info. Has anyone confirmed with a dealer recently?
#6
Thee 5/11/24 MY25 DOG says:
- the GLE53 includes as standard equipment "AMG Ride Control +" (489). "AMG Active Ride Control" (465) is available as a $2,800 option.
- the GLE63 includes as standard equipment "AMG Active Ride Control based on AMG Ride Control Plus + (465)"
Perhaps it's me, but I've seen "ARC" thrown around a lot, as well as "Active Ride Control." Seems like ARC could either mean AMG Ride Control or Active Ride Control. And @superswiss posted at #2 above a description of "AMG Active Ride Control." Whatever THAT is, seems like that is what I want to include on my MY25 GLE53 build.
Last edited by Hammer212; 06-25-2024 at 12:37 AM.
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 8,702
Received 3,990 Likes
on
2,661 Posts
2019 C63CS
So... not sure if this is a nomenclature issue, a material issue, or what. But it is confusing, at least to me....
Thee 5/11/24 MY25 DOG says:
- the GLE53 includes as standard equipment "AMG Ride Control +" (489). "AMG Active Ride Control" (465) is available as a $2,800 option.
- the GLE63 includes as standard equipment "AMG Active Ride Control based on AMG Ride Control Plus + (465)"
Perhaps it's me, but I've seen "ARC" thrown around a lot, as well as "Active Ride Control." Seems like ARC could either mean AMG Ride Control or Active Ride Control. And @superswiss posted at #2 above a description of "AMG Active Ride Control." Whatever THAT is, seems like that is what I want to include on my MY25 GLE53 build.
Thee 5/11/24 MY25 DOG says:
- the GLE53 includes as standard equipment "AMG Ride Control +" (489). "AMG Active Ride Control" (465) is available as a $2,800 option.
- the GLE63 includes as standard equipment "AMG Active Ride Control based on AMG Ride Control Plus + (465)"
Perhaps it's me, but I've seen "ARC" thrown around a lot, as well as "Active Ride Control." Seems like ARC could either mean AMG Ride Control or Active Ride Control. And @superswiss posted at #2 above a description of "AMG Active Ride Control." Whatever THAT is, seems like that is what I want to include on my MY25 GLE53 build.
Trending Topics
#8
Super Member
4 features that I am impressed with (at least in theory), on the ‘63
4WS
4Matic
HUD
ARC
4WS
4Matic
HUD
ARC
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
#10
MBWorld God!
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: on my way
Posts: 30,695
Received 3,421 Likes
on
2,859 Posts
2012 CLS63
AMG typically( always) has better power, brakes, suspension and styling. These watered down 'AMGs' are sad.
#11
Not sure how common my situation is, but it turns out this almost-AMG checks a lot of boxes for me. I need to replace my wife's '19 X5 DD, and she is not a driving enthusiast. But I also drive it a lot. Net of evaluating all the usual suspects including the SQ7 and the Range Rover Sport, I narrowed the search down to the GLE450 and GLE580. It was then suggested to me that I look closer at the GLE53, as a way to get more power and style over the GLE450, without the downside of the GLE580's hydration needs, the wonders of its V8 notwithstanding. And so I did, and at least in my particular case, the almost-AMG slots in nicely.
Based on my years of experience with the E63, full-up AMGs don't make the best daily drivers. They're not engineered to sit in traffic, ping pong from one stop light to the next, and generally run around town. Even in Comfort drive mode, it takes effort to drive and lacks the manners one -- or at least my wife -- would prefer in a DD. Hence, my enquiries into ARC.
These almost-AMGs attempt to achieve the best of both worlds (power and comfort), and end up compromising on both. I totally get it. But as I can attest, there is at least a small market for these offerings. Car dudes married to non-car dudettes, and vice-versa.
FWIW, BMW does the same thing with its M sub-brand. There are various degrees of M-ness.
Last edited by Hammer212; 06-25-2024 at 10:08 AM.
The following 3 users liked this post by Hammer212:
#12
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 8,702
Received 3,990 Likes
on
2,661 Posts
2019 C63CS
@superswiss Thank you. So, if I spec on a GLE53 build option 465 (AMG Active Ride Control), combined with standard equipment 489 (AMG Ride Control +), that I'd get the system you helpfully described above in #2?
The following users liked this post:
Hammer212 (06-25-2024)
#14
Now researching winter tires and wheels on another thread. https://mbworld.org/forums/gle63s-gl...ml#post8991602
The following users liked this post:
superswiss (06-25-2024)
#15
MBWorld God!
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: on my way
Posts: 30,695
Received 3,421 Likes
on
2,859 Posts
2012 CLS63
@hyperion667 I've driven a full-up W212 E63 since 2014 and had until very recently shared your perspective. My point of view had been, and largely remains, if there's not a hand-built AMG engine crafted by one technician under the hood, then it's not a "real" AMG. Throw in suspension, brakes, and the argument gets even stronger.
Not sure how common my situation is, but it turns out this almost-AMG checks a lot of boxes for me. I need to replace my wife's '19 X5 DD, and she is not a driving enthusiast. But I also drive it a lot. Net of evaluating all the usual suspects including the SQ7 and the Range Rover Sport, I narrowed the search down to the GLE450 and GLE580. It was then suggested to me that I look closer at the GLE53, as a way to get more power and style over the GLE450, without the downside of the GLE580's hydration needs, the wonders of its V8 notwithstanding. And so I did, and at least in my particular case, the almost-AMG slots in nicely.
Based on my years of experience with the E63, full-up AMGs don't make the best daily drivers. They're not engineered to sit in traffic, ping pong from one stop light to the next, and generally run around town. Even in Comfort drive mode, it takes effort to drive and lacks the manners one -- or at least my wife -- would prefer in a DD. Hence, my enquiries into ARC.
These almost-AMGs attempt to achieve the best of both worlds (power and comfort), and end up compromising on both. I totally get it. But as I can attest, there is at least a small market for these offerings. Car dudes married to non-car dudettes, and vice-versa.
FWIW, BMW does the same thing with its M sub-brand. There are various degrees of M-ness.
Not sure how common my situation is, but it turns out this almost-AMG checks a lot of boxes for me. I need to replace my wife's '19 X5 DD, and she is not a driving enthusiast. But I also drive it a lot. Net of evaluating all the usual suspects including the SQ7 and the Range Rover Sport, I narrowed the search down to the GLE450 and GLE580. It was then suggested to me that I look closer at the GLE53, as a way to get more power and style over the GLE450, without the downside of the GLE580's hydration needs, the wonders of its V8 notwithstanding. And so I did, and at least in my particular case, the almost-AMG slots in nicely.
Based on my years of experience with the E63, full-up AMGs don't make the best daily drivers. They're not engineered to sit in traffic, ping pong from one stop light to the next, and generally run around town. Even in Comfort drive mode, it takes effort to drive and lacks the manners one -- or at least my wife -- would prefer in a DD. Hence, my enquiries into ARC.
These almost-AMGs attempt to achieve the best of both worlds (power and comfort), and end up compromising on both. I totally get it. But as I can attest, there is at least a small market for these offerings. Car dudes married to non-car dudettes, and vice-versa.
FWIW, BMW does the same thing with its M sub-brand. There are various degrees of M-ness.
My wife is out of town and I have been driving her Honda Pilot and I gotta say it's nice change lol. I honestly think my next new car will be a Honda, Volvo or maybe even Range Rover.
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 8,702
Received 3,990 Likes
on
2,661 Posts
2019 C63CS
@hyperion667 I've driven a full-up W212 E63 since 2014 and had until very recently shared your perspective. My point of view had been, and largely remains, if there's not a hand-built AMG engine crafted by one technician under the hood, then it's not a "real" AMG. Throw in suspension, brakes, and the argument gets even stronger.
Not sure how common my situation is, but it turns out this almost-AMG checks a lot of boxes for me. I need to replace my wife's '19 X5 DD, and she is not a driving enthusiast. But I also drive it a lot. Net of evaluating all the usual suspects including the SQ7 and the Range Rover Sport, I narrowed the search down to the GLE450 and GLE580. It was then suggested to me that I look closer at the GLE53, as a way to get more power and style over the GLE450, without the downside of the GLE580's hydration needs, the wonders of its V8 notwithstanding. And so I did, and at least in my particular case, the almost-AMG slots in nicely.
Based on my years of experience with the E63, full-up AMGs don't make the best daily drivers. They're not engineered to sit in traffic, ping pong from one stop light to the next, and generally run around town. Even in Comfort drive mode, it takes effort to drive and lacks the manners one -- or at least my wife -- would prefer in a DD. Hence, my enquiries into ARC.
These almost-AMGs attempt to achieve the best of both worlds (power and comfort), and end up compromising on both. I totally get it. But as I can attest, there is at least a small market for these offerings. Car dudes married to non-car dudettes, and vice-versa.
FWIW, BMW does the same thing with its M sub-brand. There are various degrees of M-ness.
Not sure how common my situation is, but it turns out this almost-AMG checks a lot of boxes for me. I need to replace my wife's '19 X5 DD, and she is not a driving enthusiast. But I also drive it a lot. Net of evaluating all the usual suspects including the SQ7 and the Range Rover Sport, I narrowed the search down to the GLE450 and GLE580. It was then suggested to me that I look closer at the GLE53, as a way to get more power and style over the GLE450, without the downside of the GLE580's hydration needs, the wonders of its V8 notwithstanding. And so I did, and at least in my particular case, the almost-AMG slots in nicely.
Based on my years of experience with the E63, full-up AMGs don't make the best daily drivers. They're not engineered to sit in traffic, ping pong from one stop light to the next, and generally run around town. Even in Comfort drive mode, it takes effort to drive and lacks the manners one -- or at least my wife -- would prefer in a DD. Hence, my enquiries into ARC.
These almost-AMGs attempt to achieve the best of both worlds (power and comfort), and end up compromising on both. I totally get it. But as I can attest, there is at least a small market for these offerings. Car dudes married to non-car dudettes, and vice-versa.
FWIW, BMW does the same thing with its M sub-brand. There are various degrees of M-ness.
I'm not sure I'd have a 63 AMG if my typical driving involved the daily grunt. I only drive around 4-5k miles annually, don't commute and rarely find myself in stop&go traffic. I have the luxury and freedom not to drive when it's busy. Most of my daily errands are walking distance for me, so I typically don't drive on weekdays at all, and for quick errands around town that require to drive I often take my wife's normal hatchback. It's just easier for that kind of driving and the small size makes it much easier to find parking. I did European Delivery with mine and in the tight inner European cities with their tight parking structures the AMG felt a bit like an elephant in the porcelain store. Usually when I travel to Europe I rent something like a VW Golf. Just way easier and less headache to get around. I also usually get one with a manual transmission to have some fun.
The following users liked this post:
Hammer212 (06-25-2024)
#17
Super Member
Wilda,
4WS= Four Wheel Steering.
The only drawback to it, is it binds and lurches in a tight turn when the tires are cold. It’s very disconcerting, as if something is breaking.
4WS= Four Wheel Steering.
The only drawback to it, is it binds and lurches in a tight turn when the tires are cold. It’s very disconcerting, as if something is breaking.
#18
Super Member
Kind of true for the E63, but the GLE63 has a torque converter rather than the MCT. It doesn't buck, it's buttery smooth in all gears, although gear shifts aren't as fast.
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 8,702
Received 3,990 Likes
on
2,661 Posts
2019 C63CS
That is true. The GLE 63, GLS 63 and G63 have the TCT transmission. The TCT has its share of complaints, though if you look around here. It isn't smooth for everybody. Lots of complaints about it even in the 43 and 53 models. AMG did tune it and the torque converter locks up relatively early to give it more of a responsive feel, but that can lead to rough shifts at times.
Last edited by superswiss; 06-25-2024 at 04:44 PM.
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thanks. I thought it meant that. I think 4WS may only be on the GT, S, and E at the moment. No 4WS on GLE yet.
#21
Pardon if I'm having a non-senior senior moment... what's the relationship between Airmatic and AMG Active Ride Control (ARC)?
Best I can tell, Airmatic Package (DC8) is standard on the GLE 580, and is a $1,710 option of the GLE 450. ARC (465) is standard on the GLE63, and is a $2,800 option on the GLE53. But I don't see Airmatic anywhere in the MY25 AMG GLE SUV DOG. Does that mean that ARC and Airmatic do not / can not coexist?
Part of my confusion lies in that my W212 E63 has Airmatic.
I'm assuming two things:
1. ARC only makes sense in the context of an SUV, versus a sedan.
2. ARC and Airmatic largely attempt to accomplish the same goals and that one OR the other makes sense, but not both together.
Thanks in advance for any explanations/clarifications.
Best I can tell, Airmatic Package (DC8) is standard on the GLE 580, and is a $1,710 option of the GLE 450. ARC (465) is standard on the GLE63, and is a $2,800 option on the GLE53. But I don't see Airmatic anywhere in the MY25 AMG GLE SUV DOG. Does that mean that ARC and Airmatic do not / can not coexist?
Part of my confusion lies in that my W212 E63 has Airmatic.
I'm assuming two things:
1. ARC only makes sense in the context of an SUV, versus a sedan.
2. ARC and Airmatic largely attempt to accomplish the same goals and that one OR the other makes sense, but not both together.
Thanks in advance for any explanations/clarifications.
#22
Super Member
Airmatic is air suspension. It's standard on the 53 and 63. ARC is an option that can be added on the 53 and standard on the 63.
Honestly, should just go to a dealer and test drive the 450, 580, 53, and 63. Paper specs and tech mumbojumbo isn't going to tell you what kind of ride and power you prefer. I chose the 63, but if I wanted to save money I would have gone with the 580. I deliberately chose the smaller 21" wheels because I wanted a softer ride and the 22" wheel didn't appeal to me on a SUV.
The 53 was too raucous, though I test drove it on 22" wheels. Also almost all the ones on dealer lots only come with the pitiful standard brakes. My GLC43 came standard with better brakes. And by the time desired options get added --- ARC, soft close doors, acoustic comfort, rear climate controls, Napa leather, powered rear seats, HUD, etc --- the price differential for the 63 engine gets easier to swallow.
The 580 is in limited supply so I didn't really look.
Honestly, should just go to a dealer and test drive the 450, 580, 53, and 63. Paper specs and tech mumbojumbo isn't going to tell you what kind of ride and power you prefer. I chose the 63, but if I wanted to save money I would have gone with the 580. I deliberately chose the smaller 21" wheels because I wanted a softer ride and the 22" wheel didn't appeal to me on a SUV.
The 53 was too raucous, though I test drove it on 22" wheels. Also almost all the ones on dealer lots only come with the pitiful standard brakes. My GLC43 came standard with better brakes. And by the time desired options get added --- ARC, soft close doors, acoustic comfort, rear climate controls, Napa leather, powered rear seats, HUD, etc --- the price differential for the 63 engine gets easier to swallow.
The 580 is in limited supply so I didn't really look.
Last edited by taphil; 06-26-2024 at 01:23 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Hammer212 (06-26-2024)
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 8,702
Received 3,990 Likes
on
2,661 Posts
2019 C63CS
AMG Ride Control is AMG's name for adaptive damping BTW. So a car that just has AMG Ride Control, has fixed/progressive coil springs and fixed anti-roll bars, but adaptive dampers. Add Airmatic to that then you have active/adaptive springs and dampers, but fixed anti-roll bars. Add ARC and you have active/adaptive springs, dampers and anti-roll bars.
Last edited by superswiss; 06-26-2024 at 01:34 PM.
#24
@taphil @superswiss Thank you both for the very helpful explanations. I love and am grateful for the details. They align with my understanding of the suspension and handling aspects of Airmatic and of ARC.
What threw me for a loop, is that nowhere in the MY25 DOG can I find ANY mention of Airmatic, either as a standard feature or as an option. As the May 7, 2024 version of the DOG is the initial one and is the one from which I am working, perhaps the silence with respect to Airmatic will be addressed in the next iteration of the DOG.
Will definitely not rely merely on specs. Nothing can substitute for proper test drives with properly-inflated tires. I just wanted to have all my ducks lined up prior to that level of engagement with the process. And you're correct... could be a challenge finding a 580.
What threw me for a loop, is that nowhere in the MY25 DOG can I find ANY mention of Airmatic, either as a standard feature or as an option. As the May 7, 2024 version of the DOG is the initial one and is the one from which I am working, perhaps the silence with respect to Airmatic will be addressed in the next iteration of the DOG.
Will definitely not rely merely on specs. Nothing can substitute for proper test drives with properly-inflated tires. I just wanted to have all my ducks lined up prior to that level of engagement with the process. And you're correct... could be a challenge finding a 580.
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 8,702
Received 3,990 Likes
on
2,661 Posts
2019 C63CS
@taphil @superswiss Thank you both for the very helpful explanations. I love and am grateful for the details. They align with my understanding of the suspension and handling aspects of Airmatic and of ARC.
What threw me for a loop, is that nowhere in the MY25 DOG can I find ANY mention of Airmatic, either as a standard feature or as an option. As the May 7, 2024 version of the DOG is the initial one and is the one from which I am working, perhaps the silence with respect to Airmatic will be addressed in the next iteration of the DOG.
Will definitely not rely merely on specs. Nothing can substitute for proper test drives with properly-inflated tires. I just wanted to have all my ducks lined up prior to that level of engagement with the process. And you're correct... could be a challenge finding a 580.
What threw me for a loop, is that nowhere in the MY25 DOG can I find ANY mention of Airmatic, either as a standard feature or as an option. As the May 7, 2024 version of the DOG is the initial one and is the one from which I am working, perhaps the silence with respect to Airmatic will be addressed in the next iteration of the DOG.
Will definitely not rely merely on specs. Nothing can substitute for proper test drives with properly-inflated tires. I just wanted to have all my ducks lined up prior to that level of engagement with the process. And you're correct... could be a challenge finding a 580.