What to do GLK vs LR2

I am new to the forum but have thoroughly enjoyed my time so far. So I am in a puzzling position. I am looking to make a purchase around June for a new vehicle and have managed to narrow my decision down to '09 LR2 and the GLK 350. I know this is a MB site so there will be some bias but I am hoping to get some insight from the board. I have ran comparatives on the two but cannot still make up my mind on which one is:
A) Economical
B) Fuel efficient
C) Aesthetic (sp?)
D) Instant gut reaction
Hope this post makes sense
Last edited by oneone10; Apr 12, 2009 at 10:16 PM. Reason: sp
I can tell you that amongst JD powers associates on vehicle dependability, LR runs last or second to last. Not that MB is on top rank either but its somewhere in the middle of the pack (50). and from a friend that owns a discovery... I totally believe JD Powers.
I love the look of LR2, its modern and yet retains the classical shape.
I would def. get a LR if the reliability isn't a concern.
There is no doubt whatsoever. I hope I will make this easy.
A) Economical? Not sure what you mean as next point is fuel efficiency. As far as I know land rovers have pretty bad resale values, I might be wrong. I think webada answered question of reliability, and it's consitent from what I read/heard.
B) Fuel Efficient...who cares it's an SUV. If you want to be economical get a sedan or prius. If GLK and LR2 are 1mpg apart does it really matter? On a serious note, Range Rover was never an economical car so can't see it being any better than GLK.
C) I hate the look of LR2. LR3 yes, Range Rovers hell yea. LR2 looks like ford escape to me. Not really, but it has as much appeal as escape. Personal preference.
D) Instand gut reaction? Not sure what that means. When I see GLK I see something very different from everything on the road in a good way. It's not screaming hey look at me, it's pretty plain car, yet sohpisticated. I hope that's becaue it's plain it won't need a redesign in 2 years.
Bottom line GLK vs. LR2...def GLK. If you asked GLK vs. LR3, GLK vs. Q5 GLK vs. Ex35 it's more arguable.
Also not sure if you test drove both. I bet LR2 feels like an SUV while GLK feels like a tall car.
I love to hear more of the board's opinion.
LR2 vs. BMW X3
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=120623
GLK Full Test Drive
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=139606
Decide for yourself.
EDIT: I think consensus is that GLK is better thant X3.
Last edited by NYCGLK; Apr 13, 2009 at 01:08 PM.
Trending Topics
Are the sales people on a revolving door or have been there for a long time? In other words, what are the chances that they will be around the next time you need a vehicle. Do you need to work on a longer term relationship with the sales persson?
All of these factors affect brand loyalty. If that is important to you... How well I was treated as a first time MB driver over the last three years deeply affected my decision to go back for a second time just a month ago.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Extended warantee was a very costly joke for very few extra miles covered and we turned it down. BMW extended warantee has cost justification built into program.
My GLK is on order for late May, early June delivery. Lots of nice choices out there. Good luck.
http://www.nationalpost.com/scripts/...tml?id=1278739



