FACELIFTED 2013 GLK NOW ON MBUSA!!!!!
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 343
Likes: 1
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
C250,GLK350
Without a console shift selector, the paddles are now a necessity even though the tranny is a slouch. I like the steering wheel, much better than what we have now, but the size of the round vents are slightly overpowering. I'd prefer removing the lower door chrome trim but it does tie into the front and read chrome. The sloping nose is a little too bird-beak for me but I could live with that. I'm really interested if they updated the steering geometry and overall road feel. Did they incorporate electro-assist or is it still back in the 18th century?
Super Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 997
Likes: 260
From: Frisco Colorado, USA
2024 GLB35 AMG, 2020 S560 Coupe
I Walk the Walk
All this talk, talk, talk, bicker, bicker, bicker. Here's my response to the 2013 GLK :
I just bought out the lease on my 2010 (and installed a Curt Hitch, and ultrasonic backup alarm.)
Thanks, MB for providing a clear choice and helping with my decision.
I just bought out the lease on my 2010 (and installed a Curt Hitch, and ultrasonic backup alarm.)
Thanks, MB for providing a clear choice and helping with my decision.
Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Honda Civic
Other than minor styling preferences, I am willing to call out anyone that doesn't find this interior a massive improvement over the previous one a blatant liar. I have driven the 2011 model of this car and the interior was cheap and underwhelming. This new interior is actually excellent. (final decision to be made when I sit in the actual production car) I wish that they had kep the square air-vents also, but other than that, this is as big of an improvement as has occured in the C class sedan for the 2012 MY refresh.
Last edited by DinB; Mar 26, 2012 at 12:29 PM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 20
Nissan GT-R BE / '12 Ducati-1199 Panigale S / '12 C300-4M Loaded/GLK350-4M Loaded
Different yes, "Massive Improvement"... I think NOT!
Super Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
From: Old Dominion
2015 VW GTI.S4; 2016 Audi Q3 Prestige
Other than minor styling preferences, I am willing to call out anyone that doesn't find this interior a massive improvement over the previous one a blatant liar. I have driven the 2011 model of this car and the interior was cheap and underwhelming. This new interior is actually excellent. (final decision to be made when I sit in the actual production car) I wish that they had kep the square air-vents also, but other than that, this is as big of an improvement as has occured in the C class sedan for the 2012 MY refresh.
Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Honda Civic
No, having driven the 2011 and 2012 C350 and seeing how big of a difference there was in that refresh is. This is the same.
Btw, this update bring a better screen, updated nav software, a colour centre screen, more modern controls, etc. Not sure why you are so focused with control knobs and bling!
Btw, this update bring a better screen, updated nav software, a colour centre screen, more modern controls, etc. Not sure why you are so focused with control knobs and bling!
Super Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
From: Old Dominion
2015 VW GTI.S4; 2016 Audi Q3 Prestige
I'm not...maybe others...but I don't speak for them.
My inclination is that I think this is a good refresh & update mid life for the GLK but it's not really game changing. Too many things that are similar to the old interior & exterior with just a little bit different shaping or small riff; but shouldn't be a difference maker for people on the fence between 2012 & 2013.
Fortunately, for people who really care about overall performance & value - "massive improvement over the previous one" is your opinion not fact that's shared by others.
My inclination is that I think this is a good refresh & update mid life for the GLK but it's not really game changing. Too many things that are similar to the old interior & exterior with just a little bit different shaping or small riff; but shouldn't be a difference maker for people on the fence between 2012 & 2013.
Fortunately, for people who really care about overall performance & value - "massive improvement over the previous one" is your opinion not fact that's shared by others.
Last edited by MBNA109; Mar 26, 2012 at 04:20 PM.
Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Honda Civic
I'm not...maybe others...but I don't speak for them.
My inclination is that I think this is a good refresh & update mid life for the GLK but it's not really game changing.
Fortunately, for people who really care about overall performance & value - "massive improvement over the previous one" is your opinion not fact that's shared by others.
My inclination is that I think this is a good refresh & update mid life for the GLK but it's not really game changing.
Fortunately, for people who really care about overall performance & value - "massive improvement over the previous one" is your opinion not fact that's shared by others.
You really need to give MB credit for making significant changes. Unlike Honda who, after 6 years, made the smallest of improvements to the civic.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 105
Likes: 1
From: Calgary AB Canada
2010 C300 Sport 4Matic
Ok, lets leave the interior (btw I forgot to mention how much better the new wheel is), what about the engine? More than 30+ hp while being more economical? Addition of advanced electronics such as fully automatic parking?
You really need to give MB credit for making significant changes. Unlike Honda who, after 6 years, made the smallest of improvements to the civic.
You really need to give MB credit for making significant changes. Unlike Honda who, after 6 years, made the smallest of improvements to the civic.
Body styling is minor but better, interior is significant. If about the same price a much better value for your dollar.
Newbie
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
2009 E300 4Matic
sorry - I think update is awesome!!!
First time posting but had to chime in....
All in my opinion:
Was considering a GLK for a while but gave up and started to look at an X3 M. I thought in terms of appearance, the whole vehicle lacked the strong presence you would expect from a MB and I felt the interior, particularly the steering wheel, console, vents, nav screen all felt a bit cheap and less substantial than competitors. ( the nav screen in the X3 is pretty sweet!)
Again, in my opinion, the new interior does look to be a "massive improvement" - sorry but the 2 comparison pics totally sell me on the new interior and make the previous look tired. As for the exterior, the nose on the AMG package looks great and increased power along with improved fuel economy - what's not to like? My only disappointments are with the lack of change on the back end, which still seems dull - and it's safe to say I don't like the the shifter on the column ( your father's Oldsmobile ) but at least this 6'4" tall driver may now have a chance at seeing the climate controls.
I think I'm interested again and may pick one up this summer unless I can wait until next year for the diesel! ( throw a 6 speed manual in the diesel and that would be one amazing whip!)
That's my 2 cents
All in my opinion:
Was considering a GLK for a while but gave up and started to look at an X3 M. I thought in terms of appearance, the whole vehicle lacked the strong presence you would expect from a MB and I felt the interior, particularly the steering wheel, console, vents, nav screen all felt a bit cheap and less substantial than competitors. ( the nav screen in the X3 is pretty sweet!)
Again, in my opinion, the new interior does look to be a "massive improvement" - sorry but the 2 comparison pics totally sell me on the new interior and make the previous look tired. As for the exterior, the nose on the AMG package looks great and increased power along with improved fuel economy - what's not to like? My only disappointments are with the lack of change on the back end, which still seems dull - and it's safe to say I don't like the the shifter on the column ( your father's Oldsmobile ) but at least this 6'4" tall driver may now have a chance at seeing the climate controls.
I think I'm interested again and may pick one up this summer unless I can wait until next year for the diesel! ( throw a 6 speed manual in the diesel and that would be one amazing whip!)
That's my 2 cents
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 105
Likes: 1
From: Calgary AB Canada
2010 C300 Sport 4Matic
First time posting but had to chime in....
All in my opinion:
Was considering a GLK for a while but gave up and started to look at an X3 M. I thought in terms of appearance, the whole vehicle lacked the strong presence you would expect from a MB and I felt the interior, particularly the steering wheel, console, vents, nav screen all felt a bit cheap and less substantial than competitors. ( the nav screen in the X3 is pretty sweet!)
Again, in my opinion, the new interior does look to be a "massive improvement" - sorry but the 2 comparison pics totally sell me on the new interior and make the previous look tired. As for the exterior, the nose on the AMG package looks great and increased power along with improved fuel economy - what's not to like? My only disappointments are with the lack of change on the back end, which still seems dull - and it's safe to say I don't like the the shifter on the column ( your father's Oldsmobile ) but at least this 6'4" tall driver may now have a chance at seeing the climate controls.
I think I'm interested again and may pick one up this summer unless I can wait until next year for the diesel! ( throw a 6 speed manual in the diesel and that would be one amazing whip!)
That's my 2 cents
All in my opinion:
Was considering a GLK for a while but gave up and started to look at an X3 M. I thought in terms of appearance, the whole vehicle lacked the strong presence you would expect from a MB and I felt the interior, particularly the steering wheel, console, vents, nav screen all felt a bit cheap and less substantial than competitors. ( the nav screen in the X3 is pretty sweet!)
Again, in my opinion, the new interior does look to be a "massive improvement" - sorry but the 2 comparison pics totally sell me on the new interior and make the previous look tired. As for the exterior, the nose on the AMG package looks great and increased power along with improved fuel economy - what's not to like? My only disappointments are with the lack of change on the back end, which still seems dull - and it's safe to say I don't like the the shifter on the column ( your father's Oldsmobile ) but at least this 6'4" tall driver may now have a chance at seeing the climate controls.
I think I'm interested again and may pick one up this summer unless I can wait until next year for the diesel! ( throw a 6 speed manual in the diesel and that would be one amazing whip!)
That's my 2 cents
Newbie
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
2009 E300 4Matic
For sure - looks great and really is a difference maker for me as I had passed over the 2012 but will hold off on something else until I can see this one at the dealer!!
Looking at the pdf - is the amg package going to be available on the 350?
(if I cant wait for the diesel)
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 105
Likes: 1
From: Calgary AB Canada
2010 C300 Sport 4Matic
For sure - looks great and really is a difference maker for me as I had passed over the 2012 but will hold off on something else until I can see this one at the dealer!!
Looking at the pdf - is the amg package going to be available on the 350?
(if I cant wait for the diesel)
Looking at the pdf - is the amg package going to be available on the 350?
(if I cant wait for the diesel)
Newbie
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Cadiz, KY
86 300 SDL, 95 300D, 95 E320 Cabrio
Styling whatever...It's a great day again in America for Diesels
You know, it's so hard in this country to find, much less afford a great diesel car or suv. You add up all the positive attributes and ask why, really, can we not have so many of the cars in Europe?
Everyone is entitled to their opinion...but geez folks. It's another great diesel, in America! I for one would love to have one. Now, if it's got that god-blessed "Eco" mode, I'd turn that off.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion...but geez folks. It's another great diesel, in America! I for one would love to have one. Now, if it's got that god-blessed "Eco" mode, I'd turn that off.
Super Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520
Likes: 5
From: Tromsø, 69° 41' N
2010 GLK 220CDI 4M BlueEFFICIENCY
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 105
Likes: 1
From: Calgary AB Canada
2010 C300 Sport 4Matic
Looks like 3 zones to me, see photo. I see the digital display on the panel between the seats. Full video:
http://www.youcar.tv/2012/interiors/...rcedes-glk-350
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 348
Likes: 2
From: Houston, Tx
2015 C63S
I for one would greatly appreciate getting a smaller sized SUV with a diesel powerplant. In regards to the DEF(urine tank) and run flats, when the ML was redesigned for 2012 it was my understanding they actually redid things so that it still uses the DEF but it now can have a spare tire which means no longer has run flat tires. I'd imagine given the weight of a GLK that they can't get past the use of DEF but should be noted the VW 4-cylinder TDI cars(with exception of Passat due to weight) do not use DEF. So it is possible to have a 4-cylinder powered diesel vehicle that does not need the stuff but again doubt the GLK will be one of those.
Last edited by Snipe656; Mar 27, 2012 at 02:10 PM. Reason: engrish
Super Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520
Likes: 5
From: Tromsø, 69° 41' N
2010 GLK 220CDI 4M BlueEFFICIENCY
Looks like 3 zones to me, see photo. I see the digital display on the panel between the seats. Full video:
http://www.youcar.tv/2012/interiors/...rcedes-glk-350
http://www.youcar.tv/2012/interiors/...rcedes-glk-350
Super Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520
Likes: 5
From: Tromsø, 69° 41' N
2010 GLK 220CDI 4M BlueEFFICIENCY
I for one would greatly appreciate getting a smaller sized SUV with a diesel powerplant. In regards to the DEF(urine tank) and run flats, when the ML was redesigned for 2012 it was my understanding they actually redid things so that it still uses the DEF but it now can have a spare tire which means no longer has run flat tires. I'd imagine given the weight of a GLK that they can't get past the use of DEF but should be noted the VW 4-cylinder TDI cars(with exception of Passat due to weight) do not use DEF. So it is possible to have a 4-cylinder powered diesel vehicle that does not need the stuff but again doubt the GLK will be one of those.
The GLK CDI BlueTECs have the fertilizer tank included and meet the EURO 6 standard - and as well the Californian.
Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Honda Civic
So, do you think if this is the case with the North American C class also then? Bad deal for the rear passengers lol. People in the rear can at laest control the amount of air coming out of the vents, corerct?
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 348
Likes: 2
From: Houston, Tx
2015 C63S
The GLK CDI BlueEFFICIENCIes do not feature the urea tank and are compliant with the EURO 5 emission standards and US Federals, however not the more stringent Californian standards.
The GLK CDI BlueTECs have the fertilizer tank included and meet the EURO 6 standard - and as well the Californian.
The GLK CDI BlueTECs have the fertilizer tank included and meet the EURO 6 standard - and as well the Californian.
Super Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520
Likes: 5
From: Tromsø, 69° 41' N
2010 GLK 220CDI 4M BlueEFFICIENCY
No, I don’t know, however noting that the size of the cargo compartment of the GLK is 15.9 cu. ft. flat for the 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY and the – BlueTEC, I assume run flat now is standard by looking at the MLs.
The old ML model cargo space was 19.5 cu. ft. for the “nonTEC” and 17.7 - for the BlueTEC, now being 24.4 cu. ft. flat for both. I will not be surprised if the new ML entry delivery as well is with run flat.
Run flat was even standard with our delivery July 2009 – spare “miniwheel” was optional, and ordered.
The old ML model cargo space was 19.5 cu. ft. for the “nonTEC” and 17.7 - for the BlueTEC, now being 24.4 cu. ft. flat for both. I will not be surprised if the new ML entry delivery as well is with run flat.
Run flat was even standard with our delivery July 2009 – spare “miniwheel” was optional, and ordered.
Super Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 520
Likes: 5
From: Tromsø, 69° 41' N
2010 GLK 220CDI 4M BlueEFFICIENCY
“For everyone’s enjoyment, dual-zone climate control filters dust and pollen as small as 0.0002" from the air.”
The THERMOTRONIC includes a display with controls on the console in the rear compartment, and as well sun - and air quality sensors.
Last edited by GLKKa2H; Mar 27, 2012 at 05:44 PM. Reason: Added thumbnail
