Chipping the 250 in North America
It looks like Brabus has a plug in ECU that gives an extra 31 HP and 60NM of Torque (413 Lb- ft)
It should get better Mileage as well...
Within some "limits" you can get a turbo-charged engine to produce as much power as you want. How long would you like your engine to last? That's the real consideration.
"It should get better Mileage as well..." - Do you really think M-B do not know how to get the best out of this engine - their engine?
"It should get better Mileage as well..." - Do you really think M-B do not know how to get the best out of this engine - their engine?
In most cases with Turbo Diesels - Chipping has led to better fuel economy - mainly due to running leaner - which yes can lead to less Engine Logevity - however there are so many sensors that the engine should be able to protect itself.
In most cases with Turbo Diesels - Chipping has led to better fuel economy - mainly due to running leaner - which yes can lead to less Engine Logevity - however there are so many sensors that the engine should be able to protect itself.
In the early 80's BMW's Formula 1 engine produced about 1300 hp in qualifying trim. It was a turbocharged 4-cylinder 1.5 liter engine. Sometimes it lasted the entire 2 hour race. Sometimes it did not.
There is no free lunch.
In the early 80's BMW's Formula 1 engine produced about 1300 hp in qualifying trim. It was a turbocharged 4-cylinder 1.5 liter engine. Sometimes it lasted the entire 2 hour race. Sometimes it did not.
There is no free lunch.
You previously asked, " Do you really think M-B do not know how to get the best out of this engine - their engine?" I'm sure they do, and I'm sure they have reasons (as any car manufacturer does) for their decisions for a production car. That does not mean, however, that the engine and tuning they deliver to you is as perfect as it could be. There are wide safety margins, and while you "pay to play," it shouldn't be thought that nothing can improve on MB's designs without significant drawbacks.
I'm not sure what your experiences with ECU tuning have been, but mine have been excellent given the appropriate company. And based on the massive amounts of user feedback to be found in some of the tuning forums, it seems like I'm not an outlier. Granted, this forum does not lend itself to tuning as there don't seem to be many users with that interest here, but with other cars (and other sections of the mercedes forums), there's a lot of talk of this sort of thing.
I used to have a WRX and used a Cobb AccessPort (ECU remapping via complete flash with off-the shelf maps). Great results, and their legacy is firmly established now. So when they started support for the N54 engine, I jumped at it for my 335. Prior to this, I was using a plug-in (Burger Motorsports' JuiceBox+). Both methods have involved conservative changes, and more aggressive changes with the Cobb tune do require further hardware (FMIC, larger capacity oil cooler, downpipes). I researched both extensively and held off until I could take measure of the company, talked with their support, and read through reams and reams user discussion on sites like wrxtuners or bimmerpost (or n54tuning).
As houseofdiesel indicated, the 250 is too new for there to be truly tested tunes. But there likely will be tunes that will come out for it. If you do your homework, and you accept that you "pay to play," it's not something all that frightening.
Your tone made it sound like MB has done everything exactly right and there can be no improvement on what they've done (or that any "improvement" comes at larger cost). I think that's what I disagree with (respectfully). There are no guarantees in life, but I don't think ECU tuning is inherently dangerous. I also believe that you can have a tune that improves every aspect without sacrificing longevity. Simply put, M-B may have designed the engine, but that doesn't mean they are giving the best possible intersection of performance and engine longevity to the consumer. If you're a large company and want the least headache, you'll skew towards reducing performance even if the gains in longevity are only in the theoretical realm and not proven.
TL;DR: ECU tuning is safe from a reputable company. Car companies are super cautious with what they give a consumer.
Trending Topics
You previously asked, " Do you really think M-B do not know how to get the best out of this engine - their engine?" I'm sure they do, and I'm sure they have reasons (as any car manufacturer does) for their decisions for a production car. That does not mean, however, that the engine and tuning they deliver to you is as perfect as it could be. There are wide safety margins, and while you "pay to play," it shouldn't be thought that nothing can improve on MB's designs without significant drawbacks.
I'm not sure what your experiences with ECU tuning have been, but mine have been excellent given the appropriate company. And based on the massive amounts of user feedback to be found in some of the tuning forums, it seems like I'm not an outlier. Granted, this forum does not lend itself to tuning as there don't seem to be many users with that interest here, but with other cars (and other sections of the mercedes forums), there's a lot of talk of this sort of thing.
I used to have a WRX and used a Cobb AccessPort (ECU remapping via complete flash with off-the shelf maps). Great results, and their legacy is firmly established now. So when they started support for the N54 engine, I jumped at it for my 335. Prior to this, I was using a plug-in (Burger Motorsports' JuiceBox+). Both methods have involved conservative changes, and more aggressive changes with the Cobb tune do require further hardware (FMIC, larger capacity oil cooler, downpipes). I researched both extensively and held off until I could take measure of the company, talked with their support, and read through reams and reams user discussion on sites like wrxtuners or bimmerpost (or n54tuning).
As houseofdiesel indicated, the 250 is too new for there to be truly tested tunes. But there likely will be tunes that will come out for it. If you do your homework, and you accept that you "pay to play," it's not something all that frightening.
Your tone made it sound like MB has done everything exactly right and there can be no improvement on what they've done (or that any "improvement" comes at larger cost). I think that's what I disagree with (respectfully). There are no guarantees in life, but I don't think ECU tuning is inherently dangerous. I also believe that you can have a tune that improves every aspect without sacrificing longevity. Simply put, M-B may have designed the engine, but that doesn't mean they are giving the best possible intersection of performance and engine longevity to the consumer. If you're a large company and want the least headache, you'll skew towards reducing performance even if the gains in longevity are only in the theoretical realm and not proven.
TL;DR: ECU tuning is safe from a reputable company. Car companies are super cautious with what they give a consumer.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
If you are going to chip - then wait - in about a year a "chipped? ECM should be down to $600 range or below.. all the tuning guys, including Brabus and Renntech are being beasty about their prices at the moment...,
To say throttle response is different or torque curves not as flat is not entirely true, that is usually the case with extreme tunes, but most off the shelf reflashes have similar driving experience on diesels, usually with a quicker throttle response over factory tune but no loss of torque or rough driving patterns, diesels respond very well to most tunes. Gas engines are entirely different, especially non turbo.




