Tire life - 20" vs 21"
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Tire life - 20" vs 21"
What type of tire life are you getting from your GLS 450? I've ordered the staggered 21"wheels and wondering what I should expect for tire life vs the standard 20'.
Last edited by Gary_D; 01-10-2021 at 10:30 AM. Reason: More descriptive title
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
We have the staggered 21” on ours. Up to about 13,000 miles. Pirelli tires that came with the car. I’d say they’ll go about 35k-40k before thinking about replacing them. They look to be about 20% used up at this point. But I’ve had Pirelli’s before as OE tire (my GTI came with them too) and couldn’t take the noise at around 30k before switching over to Michelin, which we’ll do with the GLS I suspect too.
This is my wife’s car mostly, and our two kids - so tires are of the utmost importance to me. I won’t (and don’t) take my tires down to the wear bars. Typically once I start to get an uneasy feeling about them primarily in the rain - they get replaced. Hydroplaning scares the crap out of me, especially with a high center of gravity.
This is my wife’s car mostly, and our two kids - so tires are of the utmost importance to me. I won’t (and don’t) take my tires down to the wear bars. Typically once I start to get an uneasy feeling about them primarily in the rain - they get replaced. Hydroplaning scares the crap out of me, especially with a high center of gravity.
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
We have the staggered 21” on ours. Up to about 13,000 miles. Pirelli tires that came with the car. I’d say they’ll go about 35k-40k before thinking about replacing them. They look to be about 20% used up at this point. But I’ve had Pirelli’s before as OE tire (my GTI came with them too) and couldn’t take the noise at around 30k before switching over to Michelin, which we’ll do with the GLS I suspect too.
This is my wife’s car mostly, and our two kids - so tires are of the utmost importance to me. I won’t (and don’t) take my tires down to the wear bars. Typically once I start to get an uneasy feeling about them primarily in the rain - they get replaced. Hydroplaning scares the crap out of me, especially with a high center of gravity.
This is my wife’s car mostly, and our two kids - so tires are of the utmost importance to me. I won’t (and don’t) take my tires down to the wear bars. Typically once I start to get an uneasy feeling about them primarily in the rain - they get replaced. Hydroplaning scares the crap out of me, especially with a high center of gravity.
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
The Pirelli tires only spin one direction, so you can’t swap left to right. They stay where they are for life of the tire.
#6
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: SW Ontario Canada
Posts: 613
Received 163 Likes
on
124 Posts
2020 GLS580, 2020 Corvette Z51
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Either way, yes you can rotate as noted left to right, but not front to back. Does it matter though? Not really sure I can answer that, I don’t know. For me, I’m fine with $1,500 +/- for new tires every 30k or so for this car. Given what it is, how much it costs in general, and the enjoyment factor of it, I’m willing to live with that expense.
Trending Topics
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I agree, but figured the only thing that would address would be the outside tread, would not prevent cupping and whatnot. I think the debate on tire rotation is fueled by the creation of the stiffened sidewall, which to some support the need to no longer really worry about rotating tires. I know my mechanic on my 212 says no to rotation of the tires. They’re the oem Conti’s and appear to be doing fine. I’m not sure how I’d feel about having the tires removed from the rim to rotate, given how expensive the rims are and the fear of messing them up.
Either way, yes you can rotate as noted left to right, but not front to back. Does it matter though? Not really sure I can answer that, I don’t know. For me, I’m fine with $1,500 +/- for new tires every 30k or so for this car. Given what it is, how much it costs in general, and the enjoyment factor of it, I’m willing to live with that expense.
Either way, yes you can rotate as noted left to right, but not front to back. Does it matter though? Not really sure I can answer that, I don’t know. For me, I’m fine with $1,500 +/- for new tires every 30k or so for this car. Given what it is, how much it costs in general, and the enjoyment factor of it, I’m willing to live with that expense.
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Tread life depends on the compound. High performance tires regardless of compound will have a shorter life since they use softer rubber. On the other hand, larger wheel sizes have shorter sidewalls which can lead to more accidental tire damage. One of the biggest improvement with Michelins high performance tires is a compound that lasts longer but its still a lot less than regular all season tires.
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Have you reached or look to be on track for 30k miles on a set? I think that's reasonable mileage. I've seen reports of the previous gen GLS eating up tires in less than 10k miles, and that's not cool to me. I won't take delivery on my GLS until March and was just wondering what to expect.
the 21 setup is staggered with notably wide tires on the rear (325 I believe, maybe 315, whatever one it is, it's wide). I think that matters as they really help to hold the rear of the car on it's tracking. there isn't any wandering around, it's solidly planted. the fronts are narrower and take the brunt of the wear given turning. but both front and rear on ours, are doing just fine. Camber isn't crazy on these cars, and the pneumatic suspension reduces the roll factor when turning, which keeps the tires firmly planted and weight shifting is reduced a bit. It helps to maintain the tires. MB mentioned that to me as well. not sure if a sales pitch thing, but I noticed just how flat the car was going around a cloverleaf to the freeway.
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
we're only at 12k miles or so, but given the condisiotn of the tires at this mileage, yes I would say we see 30k without issue.
the 21 setup is staggered with notably wide tires on the rear (325 I believe, maybe 315, whatever one it is, it's wide). I think that matters as they really help to hold the rear of the car on it's tracking. there isn't any wandering around, it's solidly planted. the fronts are narrower and take the brunt of the wear given turning. but both front and rear on ours, are doing just fine. Camber isn't crazy on these cars, and the pneumatic suspension reduces the roll factor when turning, which keeps the tires firmly planted and weight shifting is reduced a bit. It helps to maintain the tires. MB mentioned that to me as well. not sure if a sales pitch thing, but I noticed just how flat the car was going around a cloverleaf to the freeway.
the 21 setup is staggered with notably wide tires on the rear (325 I believe, maybe 315, whatever one it is, it's wide). I think that matters as they really help to hold the rear of the car on it's tracking. there isn't any wandering around, it's solidly planted. the fronts are narrower and take the brunt of the wear given turning. but both front and rear on ours, are doing just fine. Camber isn't crazy on these cars, and the pneumatic suspension reduces the roll factor when turning, which keeps the tires firmly planted and weight shifting is reduced a bit. It helps to maintain the tires. MB mentioned that to me as well. not sure if a sales pitch thing, but I noticed just how flat the car was going around a cloverleaf to the freeway.