CLK320 vs G35
#26
Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Someone bumped an almost 1 year old thread.
G35>CLK 320
And as the above post stated a G35=CLK 430 until high speeds when the larger V-8 opens up.
Don't sleep, very swift cars, the G35
G35>CLK 320
And as the above post stated a G35=CLK 430 until high speeds when the larger V-8 opens up.
Don't sleep, very swift cars, the G35
And with the 2007 G coming out with well over 300hp, C & CLK class cars won't have a chance. You'll need an AMG to beat it.
#28
Super Member
Originally Posted by Improviz
Oh, I predict that the upcoming CLK550, with 380 horsepower and one more gear, will handle it just fine....
Stick G35's are quick with the proper drivers. But since I've only raced them with the big white thing in my sig I won't discuss the details.
#29
Originally Posted by Roupin
You mean 2 more gears...going from 5 to 7.
Stick G35's are quick with the proper drivers. But since I've only raced them with the big white thing in my sig I won't discuss the details.
Stick G35's are quick with the proper drivers. But since I've only raced them with the big white thing in my sig I won't discuss the details.
#30
Super Member
Originally Posted by Improviz
No, I meant one more gear, going from six to seven. I was thinking of the six speed model. I doubt the car mentioned in the original thread post was an auto....
![wall](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/banghead.gif)
Just to redeem myself, let me just point out that the CLK550 will have 382 horses
![Stick Out Tongue](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
Last edited by Roupin; 04-21-2006 at 12:15 AM.
#31
Originally Posted by Roupin
Damn. I thought you slipped up and jumped at the chance ![wall](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/banghead.gif)
![wall](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/banghead.gif)
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Originally Posted by Roupin
Just to redeem myself, let me just point out that the CLK550 will have 382 horses ![Stick Out Tongue](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
![Stick Out Tongue](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#32
Super Member
Originally Posted by Improviz
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Originally Posted by Improviz
Lol!
Yeah, but if past experience is any indicator, they'll probably derate it so that it doesn't have the same HP as the S...although waitaminute, they may not, as I don't think they do this on non-AMG models, so it may be 382 after all!
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Last edited by Roupin; 04-21-2006 at 01:46 AM.
#33
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A Beater
No offense, but I really think it is the G35 driver error that cost the race. CLK320 is not only heavy but also slow. I've seen members from other MB forum trying to tell the world that they beat my debagged C55 with stage 2 mods.
As with my Subaru STi @ 425WHP, I almost lost to a CLS55 because I was dicking around toying with the guy off of the start. Not to discredit your story, but if it was a CLK55, the kill will be more believable.
As with my Subaru STi @ 425WHP, I almost lost to a CLS55 because I was dicking around toying with the guy off of the start. Not to discredit your story, but if it was a CLK55, the kill will be more believable.