Kill Stories Discuss your exciting high speed excursions here!

CLK320 vs G35

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-20-2006, 02:08 PM
  #26  
Banned
 
tuscanraider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,706
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bantha
Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Someone bumped an almost 1 year old thread.
G35>CLK 320

And as the above post stated a G35=CLK 430 until high speeds when the larger V-8 opens up.

Don't sleep, very swift cars, the G35

And with the 2007 G coming out with well over 300hp, C & CLK class cars won't have a chance. You'll need an AMG to beat it.
Old 04-20-2006, 07:23 PM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Improviz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 AMG
Originally Posted by tuscanraider
And with the 2007 G coming out with well over 300hp, C & CLK class cars won't have a chance. You'll need an AMG to beat it.
Oh, I predict that the upcoming CLK550, with 380 horsepower and one more gear, will handle it just fine....
Old 04-20-2006, 10:25 PM
  #28  
Super Member
 
Roupin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Encino, CA
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
a toy
Originally Posted by Improviz
Oh, I predict that the upcoming CLK550, with 380 horsepower and one more gear, will handle it just fine....
You mean 2 more gears...going from 5 to 7.

Stick G35's are quick with the proper drivers. But since I've only raced them with the big white thing in my sig I won't discuss the details.
Old 04-20-2006, 11:40 PM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Improviz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 AMG
Originally Posted by Roupin
You mean 2 more gears...going from 5 to 7.

Stick G35's are quick with the proper drivers. But since I've only raced them with the big white thing in my sig I won't discuss the details.
No, I meant one more gear, going from six to seven. I was thinking of the six speed model. I doubt the car mentioned in the original thread post was an auto....
Old 04-21-2006, 12:12 AM
  #30  
Super Member
 
Roupin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Encino, CA
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
a toy
Originally Posted by Improviz
No, I meant one more gear, going from six to seven. I was thinking of the six speed model. I doubt the car mentioned in the original thread post was an auto....
Damn. I thought you slipped up and jumped at the chance

Just to redeem myself, let me just point out that the CLK550 will have 382 horses

Last edited by Roupin; 04-21-2006 at 12:15 AM.
Old 04-21-2006, 01:20 AM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Improviz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 AMG
Originally Posted by Roupin
Damn. I thought you slipped up and jumped at the chance
Well, the car could have been a five speed....but I was still thinking of a six!

Originally Posted by Roupin
Just to redeem myself, let me just point out that the CLK550 will have 382 horses
Lol! Yeah, but if past experience is any indicator, they'll probably derate it so that it doesn't have the same HP as the S...although waitaminute, they may not, as I don't think they do this on non-AMG models, so it may be 382 after all!
Old 04-21-2006, 01:44 AM
  #32  
Super Member
 
Roupin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Encino, CA
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
a toy
Originally Posted by Improviz
Well, the car could have been a five speed....but I was still thinking of a six!
Most people wouldn't bother modding an auto when a stick is available, with better performance, that can handle more power without having to tear it apart. So I also agree that it was probably a 6-speed G35.

Originally Posted by Improviz
Lol! Yeah, but if past experience is any indicator, they'll probably derate it so that it doesn't have the same HP as the S...although waitaminute, they may not, as I don't think they do this on non-AMG models, so it may be 382 after all!
Ooh finally I got something accomplished.

Last edited by Roupin; 04-21-2006 at 01:46 AM.
Old 04-23-2006, 04:24 AM
  #33  
Member
 
XPRO.US's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Beater
No offense, but I really think it is the G35 driver error that cost the race. CLK320 is not only heavy but also slow. I've seen members from other MB forum trying to tell the world that they beat my debagged C55 with stage 2 mods.

As with my Subaru STi @ 425WHP, I almost lost to a CLS55 because I was dicking around toying with the guy off of the start. Not to discredit your story, but if it was a CLK55, the kill will be more believable.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: CLK320 vs G35



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 PM.