95 C36 vs 01 Audi S4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,475
Likes: 5
From: City with Tall buildings!
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
Damn I´m still in DR njoying the Sun ,but I´m also dying to come home and see how my BEAST will run against the Audi´s and the two CLK55´s.
I will definitely be there.
I will definitely be there.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,475
Likes: 5
From: City with Tall buildings!
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Let me tell you the power of my CLK 55. My bros 04 GTO which runs 13.7@103 in the 1/4. I did a little run only to like 70 I was like 3 cars ahead! Imagine the 1/4 mile.
LS1 GTO (5.7L) have no chance against our cars - LS2 (6.0) are a different story. i went against one, but was only able to stay even with it. not sure if it was stock, but it was LOUD!!
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Yo if the GTO was loud its definitely not stock. My bros GTO has straight exhaust and its loud!
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Tom you got to realize that my car is stock and it runs in the 12s to 13sec trapping 109 in the 1/4 which is damn impressive. What does your S4 run stock? Modding any car will make it go faster,depends on how deep is your wallet. If I wanted just a drag car I wouldve got a used 405hp Z06 and mod it to run 11s NA. But Vettes are dime a dozen. I wanted something rare and sporty.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,974
Likes: 5
From: Southern California
2017 W205 C43 AMG
Tom you got to realize that my car is stock and it runs in the 12s to 13sec trapping 109 in the 1/4 which is damn impressive. What does your S4 run stock? Modding any car will make it go faster,depends on how deep is your wallet. If I wanted just a drag car I wouldve got a used 405hp Z06 and mod it to run 11s NA. But Vettes are dime a dozen. I wanted something rare and sporty.
man, I hear ya'. I had a 2001 B5 Audi S4. It felt like a turbocharged Passat. AMG FTW!
Tom you got to realize that my car is stock and it runs in the 12s to 13sec trapping 109 in the 1/4 which is damn impressive. What does your S4 run stock? Modding any car will make it go faster,depends on how deep is your wallet. If I wanted just a drag car I wouldve got a used 405hp Z06 and mod it to run 11s NA. But Vettes are dime a dozen. I wanted something rare and sporty.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Fort Lee, NJ and SoCal (Rancho C)
Audi S4 Avant and BMW X5 4.4
[QUOTE=Jons95c36amg;2782195]Tom you got to realize that my car is stock and it runs in the 12s to 13sec trapping 109 in the 1/4 which is damn impressive.QUOTE]
what you have to realize is that 109 mph traps is under the best conditions and CLK55's don't come anywhere near trapping that number consistently. I'll give you maybe 105-107 mph tops. I doubt you'd come remotely close to 110. Here is a motorweek review of a CLK55
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2306a.shtml
mid to lo 13's at mid 105 is prob in range. Remember....you're not exactly lightweight, and have a Auto tranny
what you have to realize is that 109 mph traps is under the best conditions and CLK55's don't come anywhere near trapping that number consistently. I'll give you maybe 105-107 mph tops. I doubt you'd come remotely close to 110. Here is a motorweek review of a CLK55
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2306a.shtml
mid to lo 13's at mid 105 is prob in range. Remember....you're not exactly lightweight, and have a Auto tranny
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Fort Lee, NJ and SoCal (Rancho C)
Audi S4 Avant and BMW X5 4.4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,475
Likes: 5
From: City with Tall buildings!
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
[QUOTE=EvilllEmpirE;2782997]
Stock I guess I can agree! But modded the fastest CLK55 N/A ran a 12.4 sec pass at 114mph.(PTE) Fastest C55 ran 12.4 at 112mph modded with no cams.
These cars are very capable of running high twelves with light mods.
Tom you got to realize that my car is stock and it runs in the 12s to 13sec trapping 109 in the 1/4 which is damn impressive.QUOTE]
what you have to realize is that 109 mph traps is under the best conditions and CLK55's don't come anywhere near trapping that number consistently. I'll give you maybe 105-107 mph tops. I doubt you'd come remotely close to 110. Here is a motorweek review of a CLK55
what you have to realize is that 109 mph traps is under the best conditions and CLK55's don't come anywhere near trapping that number consistently. I'll give you maybe 105-107 mph tops. I doubt you'd come remotely close to 110. Here is a motorweek review of a CLK55
These cars are very capable of running high twelves with light mods.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,475
Likes: 5
From: City with Tall buildings!
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,475
Likes: 5
From: City with Tall buildings!
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
However I don´t kniow how my car would run against yours,we´ll have to seee!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 0
From: The city that never sleeps
ML320, Looking for my S4
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
[QUOTE=EvilllEmpirE;2782997]
Didnt you read the damn above post when i ran my bros 04 GTO with boltons which runs 13.7@103?
I practically ran away from him. The 1/4 would be like 6 cars! Also my beltimer read 13.0@ 109.5 in the 1/4 70degrees. Its very accurate because I took it to the drag strip the last time I went.
Tom you got to realize that my car is stock and it runs in the 12s to 13sec trapping 109 in the 1/4 which is damn impressive.QUOTE]
what you have to realize is that 109 mph traps is under the best conditions and CLK55's don't come anywhere near trapping that number consistently. I'll give you maybe 105-107 mph tops. I doubt you'd come remotely close to 110. Here is a motorweek review of a CLK55
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2306a.shtml
mid to lo 13's at mid 105 is prob in range. Remember....you're not exactly lightweight, and have a Auto tranny
what you have to realize is that 109 mph traps is under the best conditions and CLK55's don't come anywhere near trapping that number consistently. I'll give you maybe 105-107 mph tops. I doubt you'd come remotely close to 110. Here is a motorweek review of a CLK55
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2306a.shtml
mid to lo 13's at mid 105 is prob in range. Remember....you're not exactly lightweight, and have a Auto tranny
I practically ran away from him. The 1/4 would be like 6 cars! Also my beltimer read 13.0@ 109.5 in the 1/4 70degrees. Its very accurate because I took it to the drag strip the last time I went.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 2
From: Desert
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
[QUOTE=EvilllEmpirE;2782997]
Look at the Motor Tend or Car&Driver where the heavier 250lbs 04 CLK 55 ran a 108,109 trap respectively.
Tom you got to realize that my car is stock and it runs in the 12s to 13sec trapping 109 in the 1/4 which is damn impressive.QUOTE]
what you have to realize is that 109 mph traps is under the best conditions and CLK55's don't come anywhere near trapping that number consistently. I'll give you maybe 105-107 mph tops. I doubt you'd come remotely close to 110. Here is a motorweek review of a CLK55
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2306a.shtml
mid to lo 13's at mid 105 is prob in range. Remember....you're not exactly lightweight, and have a Auto tranny
what you have to realize is that 109 mph traps is under the best conditions and CLK55's don't come anywhere near trapping that number consistently. I'll give you maybe 105-107 mph tops. I doubt you'd come remotely close to 110. Here is a motorweek review of a CLK55
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2306a.shtml
mid to lo 13's at mid 105 is prob in range. Remember....you're not exactly lightweight, and have a Auto tranny
