95 C36 vs 01 Audi S4
04-21-2008, 06:40 PM
#151
MBWorld Fanatic!
Damn IŽm still in DR njoying the Sun ,but IŽm also dying to come home and see how my BEAST will run against the AudiŽs and the two CLK55Žs.
I will definitely be there.
I will definitely be there.
04-21-2008, 06:42 PM
#152
MBWorld Fanatic!
04-21-2008, 08:55 PM
#154
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Let me tell you the power of my CLK 55. My bros 04 GTO which runs 13.7@103 in the 1/4. I did a little run only to like 70 I was like 3 cars ahead! Imagine the 1/4 mile.
04-22-2008, 09:37 PM
#162
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Tom you got to realize that my car is stock and it runs in the 12s to 13sec trapping 109 in the 1/4 which is damn impressive. What does your S4 run stock? Modding any car will make it go faster,depends on how deep is your wallet. If I wanted just a drag car I wouldve got a used 405hp Z06 and mod it to run 11s NA. But Vettes are dime a dozen. I wanted something rare and sporty.
04-22-2008, 09:52 PM
#163
MBWorld Fanatic!
Tom you got to realize that my car is stock and it runs in the 12s to 13sec trapping 109 in the 1/4 which is damn impressive. What does your S4 run stock? Modding any car will make it go faster,depends on how deep is your wallet. If I wanted just a drag car I wouldve got a used 405hp Z06 and mod it to run 11s NA. But Vettes are dime a dozen. I wanted something rare and sporty.
man, I hear ya'. I had a 2001 B5 Audi S4. It felt like a turbocharged Passat. AMG FTW!
04-22-2008, 10:03 PM
#164
Tom you got to realize that my car is stock and it runs in the 12s to 13sec trapping 109 in the 1/4 which is damn impressive. What does your S4 run stock? Modding any car will make it go faster,depends on how deep is your wallet. If I wanted just a drag car I wouldve got a used 405hp Z06 and mod it to run 11s NA. But Vettes are dime a dozen. I wanted something rare and sporty.
04-22-2008, 10:42 PM
#165
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
With a 1.9 60ft 12s is possible. Its a matter of hooking up. But stock tires dont do justice. Just look at the trap speed almost 110.
04-23-2008, 09:17 AM
#166
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Lee, NJ and SoCal (Rancho C)
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Audi S4 Avant and BMW X5 4.4
[QUOTE=Jons95c36amg;2782195]Tom you got to realize that my car is stock and it runs in the 12s to 13sec trapping 109 in the 1/4 which is damn impressive.QUOTE]
what you have to realize is that 109 mph traps is under the best conditions and CLK55's don't come anywhere near trapping that number consistently. I'll give you maybe 105-107 mph tops. I doubt you'd come remotely close to 110. Here is a motorweek review of a CLK55
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2306a.shtml
mid to lo 13's at mid 105 is prob in range. Remember....you're not exactly lightweight, and have a Auto tranny
what you have to realize is that 109 mph traps is under the best conditions and CLK55's don't come anywhere near trapping that number consistently. I'll give you maybe 105-107 mph tops. I doubt you'd come remotely close to 110. Here is a motorweek review of a CLK55
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2306a.shtml
mid to lo 13's at mid 105 is prob in range. Remember....you're not exactly lightweight, and have a Auto tranny
04-23-2008, 09:18 AM
#167
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Lee, NJ and SoCal (Rancho C)
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Audi S4 Avant and BMW X5 4.4
04-23-2008, 01:50 PM
#169
MBWorld Fanatic!
[QUOTE=EvilllEmpirE;2782997]
Stock I guess I can agree! But modded the fastest CLK55 N/A ran a 12.4 sec pass at 114mph.(PTE) Fastest C55 ran 12.4 at 112mph modded with no cams.
These cars are very capable of running high twelves with light mods.
Tom you got to realize that my car is stock and it runs in the 12s to 13sec trapping 109 in the 1/4 which is damn impressive.QUOTE]
what you have to realize is that 109 mph traps is under the best conditions and CLK55's don't come anywhere near trapping that number consistently. I'll give you maybe 105-107 mph tops. I doubt you'd come remotely close to 110. Here is a motorweek review of a CLK55
what you have to realize is that 109 mph traps is under the best conditions and CLK55's don't come anywhere near trapping that number consistently. I'll give you maybe 105-107 mph tops. I doubt you'd come remotely close to 110. Here is a motorweek review of a CLK55
These cars are very capable of running high twelves with light mods.
04-23-2008, 01:51 PM
#170
MBWorld Fanatic!
04-23-2008, 01:52 PM
#171
MBWorld Fanatic!
However I donŽt kniow how my car would run against yours,weŽll have to seee!
04-23-2008, 07:49 PM
#172
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The city that never sleeps
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ML320, Looking for my S4
04-23-2008, 08:47 PM
#173
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
[QUOTE=EvilllEmpirE;2782997]
Didnt you read the damn above post when i ran my bros 04 GTO with boltons which runs 13.7@103?
I practically ran away from him. The 1/4 would be like 6 cars! Also my beltimer read 13.0@ 109.5 in the 1/4 70degrees. Its very accurate because I took it to the drag strip the last time I went.
Tom you got to realize that my car is stock and it runs in the 12s to 13sec trapping 109 in the 1/4 which is damn impressive.QUOTE]
what you have to realize is that 109 mph traps is under the best conditions and CLK55's don't come anywhere near trapping that number consistently. I'll give you maybe 105-107 mph tops. I doubt you'd come remotely close to 110. Here is a motorweek review of a CLK55
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2306a.shtml
mid to lo 13's at mid 105 is prob in range. Remember....you're not exactly lightweight, and have a Auto tranny
what you have to realize is that 109 mph traps is under the best conditions and CLK55's don't come anywhere near trapping that number consistently. I'll give you maybe 105-107 mph tops. I doubt you'd come remotely close to 110. Here is a motorweek review of a CLK55
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2306a.shtml
mid to lo 13's at mid 105 is prob in range. Remember....you're not exactly lightweight, and have a Auto tranny
I practically ran away from him. The 1/4 would be like 6 cars! Also my beltimer read 13.0@ 109.5 in the 1/4 70degrees. Its very accurate because I took it to the drag strip the last time I went.
04-23-2008, 09:01 PM
#174
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
[QUOTE=EvilllEmpirE;2782997]
Look at the Motor Tend or Car&Driver where the heavier 250lbs 04 CLK 55 ran a 108,109 trap respectively.
Tom you got to realize that my car is stock and it runs in the 12s to 13sec trapping 109 in the 1/4 which is damn impressive.QUOTE]
what you have to realize is that 109 mph traps is under the best conditions and CLK55's don't come anywhere near trapping that number consistently. I'll give you maybe 105-107 mph tops. I doubt you'd come remotely close to 110. Here is a motorweek review of a CLK55
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2306a.shtml
mid to lo 13's at mid 105 is prob in range. Remember....you're not exactly lightweight, and have a Auto tranny
what you have to realize is that 109 mph traps is under the best conditions and CLK55's don't come anywhere near trapping that number consistently. I'll give you maybe 105-107 mph tops. I doubt you'd come remotely close to 110. Here is a motorweek review of a CLK55
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2306a.shtml
mid to lo 13's at mid 105 is prob in range. Remember....you're not exactly lightweight, and have a Auto tranny
