CLK55 vs Jeep SRT8
#51
MBWorld Fanatic!
SRT8 vs ML63AMG: 0-120MPH
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgIXutLYGXc
2nd run, 0-125MPH:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVQNi8o5maE
Jeep SRT8 vs E60 M5:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsNyxcXbvX4
And last one > Jeep SRT8 vs Cayenne Turbo S :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyyDWv6_8Oo
Better videos:
ML63 AMG vs Cayenne Turbo S:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kBHpHBYFiU
Modded 500BHP JEEP SRT8 vs ML63AMG:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSUxNpgM1AI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgIXutLYGXc
2nd run, 0-125MPH:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVQNi8o5maE
Jeep SRT8 vs E60 M5:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsNyxcXbvX4
And last one > Jeep SRT8 vs Cayenne Turbo S :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyyDWv6_8Oo
Better videos:
ML63 AMG vs Cayenne Turbo S:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kBHpHBYFiU
Modded 500BHP JEEP SRT8 vs ML63AMG:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSUxNpgM1AI
Tom
#52
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SLK55, Mustang 480hp, CBR600rr
SRT8 vs ML63AMG: 0-120MPH
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgIXutLYGXc
2nd run, 0-125MPH:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVQNi8o5maE
Jeep SRT8 vs E60 M5:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsNyxcXbvX4
And last one > Jeep SRT8 vs Cayenne Turbo S :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyyDWv6_8Oo
Better videos:
ML63 AMG vs Cayenne Turbo S:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kBHpHBYFiU
Modded 500BHP JEEP SRT8 vs ML63AMG:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSUxNpgM1AI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgIXutLYGXc
2nd run, 0-125MPH:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVQNi8o5maE
Jeep SRT8 vs E60 M5:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsNyxcXbvX4
And last one > Jeep SRT8 vs Cayenne Turbo S :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyyDWv6_8Oo
Better videos:
ML63 AMG vs Cayenne Turbo S:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kBHpHBYFiU
Modded 500BHP JEEP SRT8 vs ML63AMG:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSUxNpgM1AI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0eT3Kg9yLho
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4F06mkk3-A&NR=1
The jeep is an impressive hole shot suv, but that's about it. It can get a car length jump on some, but then it's about over. Kind of reminds me of the old Cyclone and Typhoon AWD SUV and truck.
Pp
#54
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Charger SRT-8
I'm having a hard time believing the 1.7 60fts but I guess with the comfort-mode weight shift and the low-end torque, it could be possible.
However, it is very track-prep dependent and obviously driver, too. The Jeep is consistent every time.
However, it is very track-prep dependent and obviously driver, too. The Jeep is consistent every time.
#55
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In a box
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W211 E55
#56
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Charger SRT-8
That's another nice dig there. I'll respond in kind. You've got anger issues because someone called BS on your once-in-a-lifetime 60ft that no one has ever been able to repeat? Like scores of others only achieving it with DRs or slicks with far lighter cars? Or lighter AWD cars with a clutch dump?
Or was the track prepped just for you? I guess the "comfort mode" works wonders. Maybe next time video tape it and send it to Toyo so they can market those tires as an alternative to DRs and slicks...
Regardless, I'll do some research and respond later.
Interestingly, searching for cars of similar power and weight, but AWD - the 911 Turbo and Nissan GT-R revealed some interesting data.
The GT-R seems to be in the 1.8 60ft range, the 911 TTs in the 1.7 60ft range. Both with trap speeds the same or higher than you.
It seems the only cars capable of 1.6 60fts are trapping into the 130s. So basically a 1.67 60ft seems to translate to a 3.0 - 3.2 0-60time.
So was it the 60mph tailwind or the higher-than-stock stall torque converter?
Or was the track prepped just for you? I guess the "comfort mode" works wonders. Maybe next time video tape it and send it to Toyo so they can market those tires as an alternative to DRs and slicks...
Regardless, I'll do some research and respond later.
Interestingly, searching for cars of similar power and weight, but AWD - the 911 Turbo and Nissan GT-R revealed some interesting data.
The GT-R seems to be in the 1.8 60ft range, the 911 TTs in the 1.7 60ft range. Both with trap speeds the same or higher than you.
It seems the only cars capable of 1.6 60fts are trapping into the 130s. So basically a 1.67 60ft seems to translate to a 3.0 - 3.2 0-60time.
So was it the 60mph tailwind or the higher-than-stock stall torque converter?
Last edited by Deuuuce; 10-03-2008 at 12:12 PM.
#58
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In a box
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W211 E55
That's another nice dig there. I'll respond in kind. You've got anger issues because someone called BS on your once-in-a-lifetime 60ft that no one has ever been able to repeat? Like scores of others only achieving it with DRs or slicks with far lighter cars? Or lighter AWD cars with a clutch dump?
Or was the track prepped just for you? I guess the "comfort mode" works wonders. Maybe next time video tape it and send it to Toyo so they can market those tires as an alternative to DRs and slicks...
Regardless, I'll do some research and respond later.
Interestingly, searching for cars of similar power and weight, but AWD - the 911 Turbo and Nissan GT-R revealed some interesting data.
The GT-R seems to be in the 1.8 60ft range, the 911 TTs in the 1.7 60ft range. Both with trap speeds the same or higher than you.
It seems the only cars capable of 1.6 60fts are trapping into the 130s. So basically a 1.67 60ft seems to translate to a 3.0 - 3.2 0-60time.
So was it the 60mph tailwind or the higher-than-stock stall torque converter?
Or was the track prepped just for you? I guess the "comfort mode" works wonders. Maybe next time video tape it and send it to Toyo so they can market those tires as an alternative to DRs and slicks...
Regardless, I'll do some research and respond later.
Interestingly, searching for cars of similar power and weight, but AWD - the 911 Turbo and Nissan GT-R revealed some interesting data.
The GT-R seems to be in the 1.8 60ft range, the 911 TTs in the 1.7 60ft range. Both with trap speeds the same or higher than you.
It seems the only cars capable of 1.6 60fts are trapping into the 130s. So basically a 1.67 60ft seems to translate to a 3.0 - 3.2 0-60time.
So was it the 60mph tailwind or the higher-than-stock stall torque converter?
I've never actually seen a magazine go down the 1/4 mile in my 19 years of racing, but I've seen plenty of know-it-all kids who were more than happy to give me their parent's money at the end of the race.
Just because you don't believe it doesn't mean it didn't happen. I swear the guy I beat didn't cry as much as you....
The pass was the third of three on a regular test-and-tune night. I posted up the whole thing for your 'research' here on the forum.
I guess knowing how to drive and owning a tuning company counts for nothing these days. I guess I should just sell it all and buy American.
Try reading my write-up on drag racing in the E55 forum. It might help your 'research.'
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 Crossfire SRT-6
Those aren't even "cars"................they are just a chassis with an HIGH HP engine, one seat and a couple panels to cover a few things. I don't even want to mention the tires they use and I haven't seen any on any dealers showroom floors lately.
#60
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Charger SRT-8
The sarcasm went completely over your head. Way, way over.
#61
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In a box
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W211 E55
A stage 1 LET car just went 11.41 @ ~120 this weekend.
1.65 60'
Pulley, HE, tune.
#62
MBWorld Fanatic!
60 ft time really is not an indication of a cars trap speed at all.
#63
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In a box
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W211 E55
A car can do 1.40 60 fts and only trap 112, depends on where the car makes power. I raced the Wonder Bread Wagon she 60' at 1.4x and ran 11.80@112 vs my 1.8 12.0@116.4, she has way less hp but a trrans brake and tq converter, car explodes the settles , fun race as I try to reel her in.
60 ft time really is not an indication of a cars trap speed at all.
60 ft time really is not an indication of a cars trap speed at all.
#64
MBWorld Fanatic!
Dude I know you will Love this!
http://s57.photobucket.com/albums/g2...rrent=1229.flv
She actually has a bad run in the vid she sets me up in the bracket race....
Dam drag racers
This car ate me alive the first 60 ft but her gearing allowed me to catch up in this race, later she walloped me by .2
http://s57.photobucket.com/albums/g2...rrent=1229.flv
She actually has a bad run in the vid she sets me up in the bracket race....
Dam drag racers
This car ate me alive the first 60 ft but her gearing allowed me to catch up in this race, later she walloped me by .2
#65
Out Of Control!!
#66
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In a box
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W211 E55
"That's an AMG Mercedes, folks...and they-are-quick, butja pay for it !"
Classic.
#67
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Charger SRT-8
#68
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Charger SRT-8