Kill Stories Discuss your exciting high speed excursions here!

C63 VS 5.0 MUSTANG 010

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-13-2010, 10:48 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
BI-TURBO-LOVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 E550 COUPE
C63 VS 5.0 MUSTANG 010

Im a mercedes benz fan and hate most american cars,Buttttt
I pulled the triger on a 2011 mustang 5.0 fully loaded 39k.
And i must say wow for the price and it beeing a new car
its truly a beast! 0-60mph is okay id say high 4s but 40-120mph this car
screams!!

So anywayz i ran a C63 in mexico bone stock, we ran from 30-100
And i must say i was suprised it was dead even!
We ran it again this time from 40mph because its a better starting gear for the c63, This time it was much more interesting he edged me out by 1.5-2
by 100mph.

OVerall my mustang does well against the high performance sedan i plan on keeping it stock untill summer!
Old 12-13-2010, 11:32 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
tbal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: BC
Posts: 3,575
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Haters crazy
the new 5 litre does pump out 400hp... keeping upto a c63? hmm

Last edited by tbal; 12-13-2010 at 11:42 PM.
The following users liked this post:
C63v8 (03-11-2020)
Old 12-13-2010, 11:36 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
M-bENZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Corrolla
lolz.

Andy
The following users liked this post:
C63v8 (03-11-2020)
Old 12-14-2010, 12:02 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C_DirtyTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,658
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts
a land yacht.
Those new GT's are no joke, nothing like the last GT's they made
Old 12-14-2010, 12:13 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
LawRens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Norcal
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
43
412hp is underrated apparently, especially with the 6 speed manuals. I autocrossed one last week, it's definitely a beast.
Old 12-14-2010, 12:16 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
budoboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'07 Charger SRT8
Mustang weighs less than a C63
Old 12-14-2010, 01:00 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
559EVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 C55
Same here not into American muscle but those cars are the best bang for the buck!Drag radials and $2,000.00 of basic bolt ons and your in the 11s.
Old 12-14-2010, 01:15 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Militant-Grunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
95 Audi urS6 Quattro
Could've been a Boss 302 w/ 444hp?
Old 12-15-2010, 01:15 AM
  #9  
Member
Thread Starter
 
BI-TURBO-LOVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 E550 COUPE
Could've been a Boss 302 w/ 444hp?

NO its my car bone stock 6 speed 415hp but it puts out around 355whp
and it weighs less then the c63 so down low defintaly close
Old 12-15-2010, 07:24 AM
  #10  
Banned
 
118E63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
amg
I believe it,'11 GT has a much better rear axle ratio than C63&that helps more than you would think.

Cant beat the bang for the buck from the new Coyote engine,not to mention you can slap a small S/C w 6psi and make 600+hp no problems
Old 12-15-2010, 08:00 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Velociabstract's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Isla Verde, Puerto Rico
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SRT-6
The new 5.0 is the real deal. I shared the track with one and he passed a GTR on the straight. Driver talent aside, the car can hold it's own against the majority of cars on the road.

Les
Old 12-15-2010, 07:58 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by BI-TURBO-LOVER
Im a mercedes benz fan and hate most american cars,Buttttt
I pulled the triger on a 2011 mustang 5.0 fully loaded 39k.
And i must say wow for the price and it beeing a new car
its truly a beast! 0-60mph is okay id say high 4s but 40-120mph this car
screams!!

So anywayz i ran a C63 in mexico bone stock, we ran from 30-100
And i must say i was suprised it was dead even!
We ran it again this time from 40mph because its a better starting gear for the c63, This time it was much more interesting he edged me out by 1.5-2
by 100mph.

OVerall my mustang does well against the high performance sedan i plan on keeping it stock untill summer!
Stock 5.0 traps 110 or so with the 3.73 axle. Stock C63 traps 114+ So that 40-100 which is a short run he got you by 2 cars which is alot. From 30 roll the c63 prob was in the wrong gear.
The following users liked this post:
C63v8 (03-11-2020)
Old 12-16-2010, 07:17 PM
  #13  
Member
Thread Starter
 
BI-TURBO-LOVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 E550 COUPE
Stock 5.0 traps 110 or so with the 3.73 axle. Stock C63 traps 114+ So that 40-100 which is a short run he got you by 2 cars which is alot. From 30 roll the c63 prob was in the wrong gear

Im sure your right but trap speed dont mean everything!
GTR only traps 118-120mph but kicks the **** out of most cars that trap higher untill 120mph or soo.
Old 12-16-2010, 07:38 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by BI-TURBO-LOVER
Stock 5.0 traps 110 or so with the 3.73 axle. Stock C63 traps 114+ So that 40-100 which is a short run he got you by 2 cars which is alot. From 30 roll the c63 prob was in the wrong gear

Im sure your right but trap speed dont mean everything!
GTR only traps 118-120mph but kicks the **** out of most cars that trap higher untill 120mph or soo.
Well GTR has awd dude. No match for a rwd on street tires. Go from a roll and thats where the gearing and hp comes into play.
Old 12-16-2010, 08:12 PM
  #15  
Super Member
 
Deuuuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Charger SRT-8
Great car OP but $39k ?!? Is that out the door?

355rwhp -I heard they were a tad higher.

Originally Posted by 118E63
I believe it,'11 GT has a much better rear axle ratio than C63&that helps more than you would think.
Overall gearing is what matters, the final drive is only part of it. A comparison of the two would be interesting.
Old 12-16-2010, 08:13 PM
  #16  
Member
 
zmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2000 C230K
The new mustangs are beastly. I have major respect for them. great engine, good transmission, looks good too. Now if only they weren't cheap and gave it an IRS. Sure solid axles are better for drag, but an option for IRS like on the old cobras would be nice. Nice kill man, it seems every day I hear about something new about an impressive feat the 5.0 has done. What color is it? I'm partial to grabber blue.
Old 12-16-2010, 08:17 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Velociabstract's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Isla Verde, Puerto Rico
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SRT-6
Originally Posted by Deuuuce
Great car OP but $39k ?!? Is that out the door?

355rwhp -I heard they were a tad higher.



Overall gearing is what matters, the final drive is only part of it. A comparison of the two would be interesting.
They are a tad higher. The one I ran with (2011 track package) dyno'd at 380 RWHP. I don't think the car can compete with the GTR or C63 AMG but it's a such a huge improvement over prior Mustangs that I give Ford a standing ovation.

Les
Old 12-16-2010, 08:18 PM
  #18  
Member
 
zmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2000 C230K
^ I dunno it about as quick on the track as an M3 and the C class competes with the 3 series. The biggest downside to our benz's is the weight. Our cars are pretty heavy and have always been.
Old 12-16-2010, 11:21 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
hhughes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2013 Chevy 427 Torch Red
Originally Posted by Militant-Grunt
Could've been a Boss 302 w/ 444hp?
Not available just yet...however the Laguna Seca version is going to be a GREAT weekend track car even with the live axle rear. Minor mods could have you pushing well under 3500 lbs with ~500 bhp. Pirelli Corsa is the stock tire
Old 12-17-2010, 01:12 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
xlr8tin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2011 GL550, 2004 Audi S4 v8
Pics of this so called 5.0 beast or it didn't happen!!!!!!!!!

Kinda shocked no one else asked first.
Old 12-17-2010, 07:50 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by Velociabstract
They are a tad higher. The one I ran with (2011 track package) dyno'd at 380 RWHP. I don't think the car can compete with the GTR or C63 AMG but it's a such a huge improvement over prior Mustangs that I give Ford a standing ovation.

Les
380whp stock on the new 5.0 track pack? Mine dynoed 360whp on Dyno dynamics bonestock-c63. But the c63 is about 350lbs more.
Old 12-17-2010, 07:51 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by Velociabstract
They are a tad higher. The one I ran with (2011 track package) dyno'd at 380 RWHP. I don't think the car can compete with the GTR or C63 AMG but it's a such a huge improvement over prior Mustangs that I give Ford a standing ovation.

Les
380whp stock on the new 5.0 track pack? Mine dynoed 360whp on Dyno dynamics bonestock-c63. But the c63 is about 350lbs more.
Old 12-17-2010, 09:09 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Velociabstract's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Isla Verde, Puerto Rico
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SRT-6
I don't know what type of dyno but I believe the guy. Here's a picture of my car and the 5.0 from the track.

Les
Attached Thumbnails C63 VS 5.0 MUSTANG 010-2011-5.0.jpg   C63 VS 5.0 MUSTANG 010-ponce.jpg  
Old 12-17-2010, 09:19 PM
  #24  
Member
Thread Starter
 
BI-TURBO-LOVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 E550 COUPE
They are a tad higher. The one I ran with (2011 track package) dyno'd at 380 RWHP. I don't think the car can compete with the GTR or C63 AMG but it's a such a huge improvement over prior Mustangs that I give Ford a standing ovation

I dont think its 380rwhp but its very fast on the streets and the highway.
My friends SRT8 challenger Auto has intake and tune and after 3rd gear it cant even keep up.
Old 12-18-2010, 06:29 AM
  #25  
Banned
 
118E63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
amg
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
380whp stock on the new 5.0 track pack? Mine dynoed 360whp on Dyno dynamics bonestock-c63. But the c63 is about 350lbs more.
The automatic in your C63 has much more parasitic loss than the manual trans in the mustang&therefore will reflect in the dyno numbers

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: C63 VS 5.0 MUSTANG 010



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:32 AM.