My C63 vs V10 S6
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My C63 vs V10 S6
Had a run in with a newer V10 Audi S6 on the highway, we did several runs & I walked him every time, no problem, thought they were faster
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Middlesex, NJ
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03 Nissan Altima 2.5S, 07 MB GL450
Another note: Yeah, these 55K engines especially modded are super fast. It's awesome so just imagine the power of the newer 5.5TT and BMW's 4.4TT
Trending Topics
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
That's a bolt on modified E55 AMG. Very nice and very fast obviously. I was thinking more "stockish" more common AMGs on this board.
Another note: Yeah, these 55K engines especially modded are super fast. It's awesome so just imagine the power of the newer 5.5TT and BMW's 4.4TT
Another note: Yeah, these 55K engines especially modded are super fast. It's awesome so just imagine the power of the newer 5.5TT and BMW's 4.4TT
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Middlesex, NJ
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03 Nissan Altima 2.5S, 07 MB GL450
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t78JHlQjiNE
By your logic and that race, you're saying a stock E55 would be quite close to a stock C6 Corvette Z06...Uh NO.
A stock Audi R8 V10 traps under 12.0 seconds in the 1/4 mile at 122 mph if I'm not wrong.
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Where in the world did you get the idea that a stock E55 would be equal to that of an Audi R8 V10??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t78JHlQjiNE
By your logic and that race, you're saying a stock E55 would be quite close to a stock C6 Corvette Z06...Uh NO.
A stock Audi R8 V10 traps under 12.0 seconds in the 1/4 mile at 122 mph if I'm not wrong.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t78JHlQjiNE
By your logic and that race, you're saying a stock E55 would be quite close to a stock C6 Corvette Z06...Uh NO.
A stock Audi R8 V10 traps under 12.0 seconds in the 1/4 mile at 122 mph if I'm not wrong.
Plus, few Stock E55 trap 11.8 sec so your 12.0 ......... not so impressive.
E55 stock can take R8 V10 for sure. I have walked Z06 .... but i am not stock.....
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Middlesex, NJ
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03 Nissan Altima 2.5S, 07 MB GL450
Audi R8 V10s from what I meant to say trap BELOW 12 seconds easily stock with the AWD at 122 mph. No stock E55 AMG will be trapping 122 mph now eh?
And if you walked a stock Z06, then you must be heavily modified because even stock C6 Z06s can trap somewhere in the 11s and at mid to upper 120s mph all day long. Best trap stock I've seen out of them was 11.0 seconds flat and at nearly 130 mph bone stock...
Yes, here's another GTboard video; hey man, open up your mind and expand it a bit. There's no BMW or Mercedes here in this race so why would they attempt to rig it?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nebhvouprQ0
Stock R8 V10 vs stock lambo Gallardo 500 HP E-gear non lp560... So you're saying a stock E55 AMG is faster just like that than a Gallardo E-gear? I highly doubt that... And these are rolls.
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
http://www.dragtimes.com/Audi-R8-Timeslip-20355.html
The DSG equipped R8 V10s are even faster...
I haven't seen a completely stock E55 trap as high as that R8 V10. There is a stock E55 with drag radials that has trapped higher... but since we are talking about kill stories on the street...the drag radials would not be as helpful as on a properly prepped track with a decent burn out.
Tom
Last edited by TMC M5; 01-12-2012 at 02:56 PM.
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Give GTBoard some credibility at least. I didn't see any BMW in that race at least.
Audi R8 V10s from what I meant to say trap BELOW 12 seconds easily stock with the AWD at 122 mph. No stock E55 AMG will be trapping 122 mph now eh?
And if you walked a stock Z06, then you must be heavily modified because even stock C6 Z06s can trap somewhere in the 11s and at mid to upper 120s mph all day long. Best trap stock I've seen out of them was 11.0 seconds flat and at nearly 130 mph bone stock...
Yes, here's another GTboard video; hey man, open up your mind and expand it a bit. There's no BMW or Mercedes here in this race so why would they attempt to rig it?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nebhvouprQ0
Stock R8 V10 vs stock lambo Gallardo 500 HP E-gear non lp560... So you're saying a stock E55 AMG is faster just like that than a Gallardo E-gear? I highly doubt that... And these are rolls.
Audi R8 V10s from what I meant to say trap BELOW 12 seconds easily stock with the AWD at 122 mph. No stock E55 AMG will be trapping 122 mph now eh?
And if you walked a stock Z06, then you must be heavily modified because even stock C6 Z06s can trap somewhere in the 11s and at mid to upper 120s mph all day long. Best trap stock I've seen out of them was 11.0 seconds flat and at nearly 130 mph bone stock...
Yes, here's another GTboard video; hey man, open up your mind and expand it a bit. There's no BMW or Mercedes here in this race so why would they attempt to rig it?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nebhvouprQ0
Stock R8 V10 vs stock lambo Gallardo 500 HP E-gear non lp560... So you're saying a stock E55 AMG is faster just like that than a Gallardo E-gear? I highly doubt that... And these are rolls.
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
BTW, OP was talking about C63 AMG against S6 V10 why you have to bring R8 ??? IF this is the case, why not the new 5.5TT E63 PP against R8 ? since they are all the new generation. Plus, R8 is more comparable to SLS or SL65 AMG since they are coupe high-end car at $200K price range.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Middlesex, NJ
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03 Nissan Altima 2.5S, 07 MB GL450
I brought it up because somebody had to mention that ALL Audis are slow when the R8 V10 and the GT aren't considered slow by any means.
And now here we are. However, I'd bet money that a E63 AMG TT with PP equipped will walk a stock R8 V10 in a rolling race to very high speeds. At least there's that.
Keep in mind that the Gallardo is NOT an LP560 which is significantly faster than the previous generation. And if you watched the race just a little more closely, you'd realize that the Gallardo driver didn't do anything wrong. Didn't shift wrong and full throttle all the way to redline and shift with E-gear... The R8 V10 did the same and both were bone stock. That older Gallardo has 500 HP and a stock E55 AMG by the way is just as fast in the 1/4 mile. After that, I'd put money on the Gallardo.
And now here we are. However, I'd bet money that a E63 AMG TT with PP equipped will walk a stock R8 V10 in a rolling race to very high speeds. At least there's that.
Keep in mind that the Gallardo is NOT an LP560 which is significantly faster than the previous generation. And if you watched the race just a little more closely, you'd realize that the Gallardo driver didn't do anything wrong. Didn't shift wrong and full throttle all the way to redline and shift with E-gear... The R8 V10 did the same and both were bone stock. That older Gallardo has 500 HP and a stock E55 AMG by the way is just as fast in the 1/4 mile. After that, I'd put money on the Gallardo.
Last edited by Innocent_Stud; 01-12-2012 at 11:12 PM.
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
FWIW I had a 2007 S6 V10 with intake/exhaust/tune and ported TB's( probably all you can do to those) and ran 13'2's @108. Heavy car with not enough torque. 2 points that are way better than an MB
1. Interior design and quality
2. V10 Sound ( my car btw) : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eQKG...FNLmj8Gjfy4TIc_
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpb6O...Dq3PjIvbRLqq9n
Also , I have absolutely raped V8 and V10 R8's in my CLS
1. Interior design and quality
2. V10 Sound ( my car btw) : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eQKG...FNLmj8Gjfy4TIc_
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpb6O...Dq3PjIvbRLqq9n
Also , I have absolutely raped V8 and V10 R8's in my CLS
#19
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
09 335i 03 CLK55 AMG
FWIW I had a 2007 S6 V10 with intake/exhaust/tune and ported TB's( probably all you can do to those) and ran 13'2's @108. Heavy car with not enough torque. 2 points that are way better than an MB
1. Interior design and quality
2. V10 Sound ( my car btw) : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eQKG...FNLmj8Gjfy4TIc_
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpb6O...Dq3PjIvbRLqq9n
Also , I have absolutely raped V8 and V10 R8's in my CLS
1. Interior design and quality
2. V10 Sound ( my car btw) : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eQKG...FNLmj8Gjfy4TIc_
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpb6O...Dq3PjIvbRLqq9n
Also , I have absolutely raped V8 and V10 R8's in my CLS
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
I brought it up because somebody had to mention that ALL Audis are slow when the R8 V10 and the GT aren't considered slow by any means.
And now here we are. However, I'd bet money that a E63 AMG TT with PP equipped will walk a stock R8 V10 in a rolling race to very high speeds. At least there's that.
Keep in mind that the Gallardo is NOT an LP560 which is significantly faster than the previous generation. And if you watched the race just a little more closely, you'd realize that the Gallardo driver didn't do anything wrong. Didn't shift wrong and full throttle all the way to redline and shift with E-gear... The R8 V10 did the same and both were bone stock. That older Gallardo has 500 HP and a stock E55 AMG by the way is just as fast in the 1/4 mile. After that, I'd put money on the Gallardo.
And now here we are. However, I'd bet money that a E63 AMG TT with PP equipped will walk a stock R8 V10 in a rolling race to very high speeds. At least there's that.
Keep in mind that the Gallardo is NOT an LP560 which is significantly faster than the previous generation. And if you watched the race just a little more closely, you'd realize that the Gallardo driver didn't do anything wrong. Didn't shift wrong and full throttle all the way to redline and shift with E-gear... The R8 V10 did the same and both were bone stock. That older Gallardo has 500 HP and a stock E55 AMG by the way is just as fast in the 1/4 mile. After that, I'd put money on the Gallardo.
#22
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 44
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 E500, 2010 R350, 2000 Audi S4, 1994 Miata
FWIW I had a 2007 S6 V10 with intake/exhaust/tune and ported TB's( probably all you can do to those) and ran 13'2's @108. Heavy car with not enough torque. 2 points that are way better than an MB
1. Interior design and quality
2. V10 Sound ( my car btw) : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eQKG...FNLmj8Gjfy4TIc_
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpb6O...Dq3PjIvbRLqq9n
Also , I have absolutely raped V8 and V10 R8's in my CLS
1. Interior design and quality
2. V10 Sound ( my car btw) : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eQKG...FNLmj8Gjfy4TIc_
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpb6O...Dq3PjIvbRLqq9n
Also , I have absolutely raped V8 and V10 R8's in my CLS
#24
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 E55 and 2011 Audi A4
Just some information for you guys, not one of those dick trolls. I'm a huge Audi guy, all I've ever owned was Audi's but I always admire Benz for what they put to the table, especially they're insane torque numbers!!! The only reason I've honestly never owned a Benz was because im a hardcore stick guy and although I have a few MB's in the family I haven't fell in love with one until the C63 (which is a ridiculous car for N/A). Anyways here's some info.
First off the R8 V8 and V10 might not be the fastest cars in the 1/4 mile. That I agree on, HOWEVER when Audi built those cars 1/4 times were not ever a thought. Those cars handle ridiculous and they're purpose is to mess cars up on a road course. As for Audi not having fast cars, that is false. They might not have any cars like Mercedes the new twin turbo motor is ridiculous and 10 second 1/4 miles with a tune is outrageous. The new S4's are running 11's with just tune and cold air intakes. It's just a small 3.0 v6 with a supercharger but they're are more than a few running 11.7-11.9's with notning but a tune and intake/exhaust combos. They are half the engine of most benz's and when my tune only S4 went 12.4@114 it was warm out and it weighed in at 4315lbs!!! The S5 and S6 are cruisers and are slow lol. The TTRS is a ridiculous car and runs 12.0 out of the box with a 2.5 5 cylinder turbo and they're are bolt on RS4's with 4.2 NA V8's running close to 11's with just exhaust and a time. Granted Audi's are not nearly as fast as most Mb's but between the S4, TTRS, R8's, and the European RS6 which has 580hp they are kidding around. Plus the new S6 said bye V10, hello 4.0 V8 Twin turbo...
First off the R8 V8 and V10 might not be the fastest cars in the 1/4 mile. That I agree on, HOWEVER when Audi built those cars 1/4 times were not ever a thought. Those cars handle ridiculous and they're purpose is to mess cars up on a road course. As for Audi not having fast cars, that is false. They might not have any cars like Mercedes the new twin turbo motor is ridiculous and 10 second 1/4 miles with a tune is outrageous. The new S4's are running 11's with just tune and cold air intakes. It's just a small 3.0 v6 with a supercharger but they're are more than a few running 11.7-11.9's with notning but a tune and intake/exhaust combos. They are half the engine of most benz's and when my tune only S4 went 12.4@114 it was warm out and it weighed in at 4315lbs!!! The S5 and S6 are cruisers and are slow lol. The TTRS is a ridiculous car and runs 12.0 out of the box with a 2.5 5 cylinder turbo and they're are bolt on RS4's with 4.2 NA V8's running close to 11's with just exhaust and a time. Granted Audi's are not nearly as fast as most Mb's but between the S4, TTRS, R8's, and the European RS6 which has 580hp they are kidding around. Plus the new S6 said bye V10, hello 4.0 V8 Twin turbo...