C63 AMG vs Chevy Cobalt T/C
He thought it would be smart to floor it, as I'm passing him.
Either he's a nut case or he wants to race.
So I decided to pass him, end result he was at my rear quarter panel. Until I put my signal on and cut him off for being a dick
HWYSTAR, show some respect. My 430 isn't modded and I believe cannot take the Cobalt. I never tried, but I watched one dispatch a 5.0 L Mustang with ease. Just something to consider
Last edited by Redcab; Nov 18, 2013 at 06:23 PM.
Trending Topics
Btw, the turbocharged Cobalt is the one to get, not the SC'd one.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
It reminds me of the dumdummduumm, I mean Neon (LS1tech joke):
Top 10 list:
1. Matt@ZZP 10.998@133.61 DP,CB,MD,T,P,DS,TK,CD,PH,C,SM,IC,CP,FBE,E85
2. Beast10007 12.189@116.51 DP, CP, A, E85 T, IC, DS
3. Mike peperni 12.544@113.71 I/DP/T/ BFG DR's
4. Marca34 12.614@113.7 T, I, CP, DP, CB, MD, IC, Street tires.
5. 2010 SS: 12.779@113.04 DP, I, CP, E85 T, IC
6. Gremlin85 12.823@113.92 CP, SRI, T, DP
7. D-mac 12.864 @ 110.48 I,DP,T,WI,GM,CD,IC,CP,DS
8. (TIE) TGLEMS 12.945@117.4 CAI, CP, IC, T, BNR 2871, DP, CB
9. (TIE) Drewbroo: 12.945@112.02 E85 T, A
9. daregooch 13.4@111.17 T, SRI, DP, ST
10. blacklscoupe 13.44@108 T
LSJ: 1/4
1.Ryan@ZZP 9.82@141.64 Chuck norris on a hamster wheel.
2.zrated89 12.403@113.03 I/H/DP/CD/CB/CM/WI/T/DS/TVS/2.7
3.VeNoM0713 12.921@110.05 I, H, DP, CB, T, TK, CD, IM, SM, FBE. 24.5x8x15 MT slicks
4.hungryhip-ccp 13.291@111.88 I,E,DP,CD,2.8,CM,T,N2O(50wet)
5.nizzle 13.607@104.64 TVS, 80's, CM, OPT B, I, T, ST
6.defo98 13.694@104.95 I, H, CB, T, ST, 2.8, 60's, CM
7.shroogis 13.711@104.88 2.8, 60's, ZZP S2, H, HP, I, CB, T
8.06blackbalt 13.786@102.67 I/H/DP/CD/T/DR
9.slvr 04 rl 13.795@114.34 TK, WR, ST, CD,
10.jmarks 13.836@107 I, DP, CB, T, 80s, TK, CD, IM, IC, CP
and from Dragtimes:
1) 12.595* 109.550 8.253 91.020 2.079 Chevrolet Cobalt ss/tc sedan 2009 tranced
2) 12.750 108.900 8.230 86.370 1.930 Chevrolet Cobalt SS 2005 Stuart Leiby
3) 12.841* 114.900 8.599 90.020 2.058 Chevrolet Cobalt SS SC 2006 Paul Pilinko
4) 12.852 115.650 8.624 90.280 2.132 Chevrolet Cobalt SS/SC 2006 Paul Pilinko
5) 12.862 109.100 8.307 87.860 2.000 Chevrolet Cobalt SS Turbo 2009 Brad Tew
6) 12.929*^ 113.250 8.517 88.449 2.029 Chevrolet Cobalt ss/tc 2009 trevor swain
7) 12.940 106.000 8.300 83.000 1.820 Chevrolet Cobalt SS 2006 Rob Archer
8) 13.113*+ 116.000 8.800 89.000 2.234 Chevrolet Cobalt ss/sc 2006 Paul Pilinko
9) 13.170* 110.400 2.100 Chevrolet Cobalt SS 2009 Cory Cercone
10) 13.182* 115.120 9.012 88.420 2.321 Chevrolet Cobalt SS 2009 Sean A AKA .ninja44
11) 13.216*^ 110.260 8.806 89.600 2.211 Chevrolet Cobalt SS Supercharged 2007 Chris Bodnar
12) 13.231* 104.080 8.484 82.470 1.952 Chevrolet Cobalt SS Supercharged 2006 Brad Cain (ralliartist)
13) 13.296* 107.860 8.615 81.330 2.110 Chevrolet Cobalt SS Supercharged 2006 Brian Miller
14) 13.325* 112.100 8.810 86.530 2.260 Chevrolet Cobalt SS Turbocharged 2008 Marin
15) 13.359 104.500 8.600 81.610 1.950 Chevrolet Cobalt SS 2006 Kevin Parker
16) 13.366*+ 105.500 8.685 82.990 2.057 Chevrolet Cobalt ss/sc 2006 Paul Pilinko
17) 13.481* 107.950 8.892 84.310 2.255 Chevrolet Cobalt SS/SC 2005 Adam Froloff (MemphisR24)
18) 13.561 106.890 8.805 81.600 2.105 Chevrolet Cobalt SS/SC 2005 Sean A AKA .ninja44
19) 13.600* 109.400 2.230 Chevrolet Cobalt ss/na 2008 mike
20) 13.605*+ 105.770 8.890 81.780 2.107 Chevrolet Cobalt SS/SC 2006 Mike aka SS33
No way in hell he was beating a BS unless his car was heavily worked on. If that was the case, he wouldn't be in here being a douche bag about it. People who have lots of work done TYPICALLY aren't going to come on another forum to make a single post about high school age antics.
ETA: The other possibility is the OP mis-categorized the car and it was some other kind of Benz. Which is possible since the OP is clearly an idiot.
NO stock Cobalt (SC or not) could ever outrun a stock C63. Period.
The fact some people might try to argue the point does not change reality.
Example: two cars at the drags. One runs 12.2 @ 109, one runs 12.5 @ 114. The car running the 12.2 got good grip and is definitely geared lower but doesn't have the horsepower. The car running 114 is the car with the most horsepower. On the road the car with the higher 1/4 mile trap speed wins because the grip and gears that mattered on the dig no longer apply. High trap speeds but low 1/4 mile times simply show a bad launch. Example: I run a consistent 110-111 trap speed. If I spin on the launch and run a high 13 I still run a 110. Weird how it all works.
A stock c63 traps in the 1/4 at ~117. The Cobalt much less even maxed out. The fun part to it all is that you never know what the next guy has under the hood.

My opinion based on many years of racing and observation...






