In the market for an ML. Can you guys educate me a little bit.
#1
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E320 CDI
In the market for an ML. Can you guys educate me a little bit.
The car is going to be for my little sister. So far I have looked at one pretty clean silver 2002 ML 320. But I recently came across a 2004 ML 350 Inspiration Edition, what the heck is "Inspiration Edition"? I have not heard of anything like this unless it is along the same lines as Designo. Also what are some common problems on ML's that your average car buff might not look for at first glance when car shopping?
Thanks for the help guys.
Thanks for the help guys.
#2
Originally Posted by SpeedLimits?
The car is going to be for my little sister. So far I have looked at one pretty clean silver 2002 ML 320. But I recently came across a 2004 ML 350 Inspiration Edition, what the heck is "Inspiration Edition"? I have not heard of anything like this unless it is along the same lines as Designo. Also what are some common problems on ML's that your average car buff might not look for at first glance when car shopping?
Thanks for the help guys.
Thanks for the help guys.
about.
I forgot to mention that at the top of these posts, there a The list of things to watch out for on a 163. Look through that list to have an idea of the kinds of issues owners have had. Don't let this list scare you. These problems don't occur with every vehicle and most of us will complain about everything and anything.
Last edited by Darkmann; 08-23-2005 at 11:34 PM.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02 ML320, 06 E350
I would get the 02 Ml320 over the 350 just for the old tested and true 3.2 liter v6. mercedes only used the 350 engine for a short time and its not even a true 3.5 liters its 3.7.(before you try and flame about how they dont use the 3.7 liter engine in US cars anymore the ML350 engine is NOT the same as the SLK350) i wouldnt spend alot on a ML so i would get the older one since all the car is going to do is go down in value. and with the $3.00 a gallon gas prices no SUV's will hold value well. i think your sister will be happy with the 02 ML320 i wouldnt go below the 02 year since they dont have the updated look and alot of the new gear the 02 years had but from 02-04 nothing major happend expt they took out the 3.2liter v6 and replaced it with the 3.7liter(possibly for money saving? is this the same 3.7 liter V6 the jeep uses?)
#4
I would say go for the 04 ml350 if you want less problems and minors one only,
the later model didn't have any recalls,
the earlier models had recalls on them,
the recall was from 98-01,
the 02-05 didn't have any recalls,
if you want a true v6 then go with the 02 ml320,
that all i have to say,
the later model didn't have any recalls,
the earlier models had recalls on them,
the recall was from 98-01,
the 02-05 didn't have any recalls,
if you want a true v6 then go with the 02 ml320,
that all i have to say,
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 7,424
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
C55 ///AMG, 535xi
get the ML350 inspiration...although I test drove it and ended up buying the ML500 inspiration. My friends ML320 is powerless compared to the ML350...trust me...and besides...the ML350i comes with the ML500 wheels larger wheels, stable car...the interior on the inspiration is more attractive...they used a limited edition leather and is all specially designed...Inspiration package comes with a ML55 grill...its worth it
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02 ML320, 06 E350
saying the Ml 320 is powerless compared to the 350 is a joke. what are we talking 20hp? both are going to be slow compared to a ML500. and for the 02 years i think the ML320 got a power boost along with different gearing so the power/accleratioin difference between the 350 and 320 are minimal.
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 7,424
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
C55 ///AMG, 535xi
Originally Posted by BiTurboV12 AMG
saying the Ml 320 is powerless compared to the 350 is a joke. what are we talking 20hp? both are going to be slow compared to a ML500. and for the 02 years i think the ML320 got a power boost along with different gearing so the power/accleratioin difference between the 350 and 320 are minimal.
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
School bus
Originally Posted by BiTurboV12 AMG
saying the Ml 320 is powerless compared to the 350 is a joke. what are we talking 20hp? both are going to be slow compared to a ML500. and for the 02 years i think the ML320 got a power boost along with different gearing so the power/accleratioin difference between the 350 and 320 are minimal.
#9
Originally Posted by deltadude388
The overall feel of the ML350 is much better than the ML320, with the Inspriation Package, yes it's all cosmetic but it sure feels much more like a luxury car vs. the regular ML. The body is significantly "tighten" up with the 03 model onwards. There's an extra 500CC in capacity between the the 3.2 and 3.7l, you will feel it. I would spring the 350. there is a reason why MB put it there.
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 7,424
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
C55 ///AMG, 535xi
no offense to all with the ML320s, Its just that when you drive a ML350, you feel a little more "expensive" than the ML320s...In the US, a full sized SUV powered by a 3.2 V6 is a joke... so is the X5 3.0, but no one complains! lol
The ML350 Inspiration looks exactly like a ML500, if you rip of the 3 and added a 0 in the end, people would not find out that its a 350. they'll have to drive it.
ML320 is sluggish to the Lexus RX300, which is sluggish to the BMW X5 3.0 which is sluggish to the ML350 (3.7 version)
When the ML320 first came out, everyone complained that Mercedes came out with a weak truck!
The ML350 Inspiration looks exactly like a ML500, if you rip of the 3 and added a 0 in the end, people would not find out that its a 350. they'll have to drive it.
ML320 is sluggish to the Lexus RX300, which is sluggish to the BMW X5 3.0 which is sluggish to the ML350 (3.7 version)
When the ML320 first came out, everyone complained that Mercedes came out with a weak truck!
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02 ML320, 06 E350
ML 320s arnt slow anyone want to drag race a 320 vs a 350 i bet you wont even pull more than a few feet. just to compare the speed of an ML320 to other cars real life experience before you call us 320s slow. ML320 vs BMW 325 convertible dead even till 60 then bmw slowly pulls away. ML320 vs mustang convertible(older V6) dead even till 80 then ML pulls away. ML320 vs honda civic 2 door ML pulls away like no other. ML vs mazda 6 dead even to 50. and to say that owning a ML350 makes you seem richer than a 320 is a joke you can talk about that when you own a 500, some people just like the smaller engines for better economy vs americans always wanting bigger. i think the only reason why mercedes used the 3.7 liter jeep engine was to save money. funny how the still use the old 3.2 liter in their cars but they dont use the 3.7 liter anymore.
this 320 vs 350 war seems like the same thing that the C230 vs C240 people are talking about how can a 1.8liter supercharged I4 be faster than a 2.x liter V6?
this 320 vs 350 war seems like the same thing that the C230 vs C240 people are talking about how can a 1.8liter supercharged I4 be faster than a 2.x liter V6?
#12
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
School bus
[QUOTE= i think the only reason why mercedes used the 3.7 liter jeep engine was to save money. funny how the still use the old 3.2 liter in their cars but they dont use the 3.7 liter anymore.
QUOTE]
No offence intended, you gotta be pretty darn naive to think the MB 3.7 is the same engine as the Jeep 3.7 V6
MB pros on the board here, feel free to chime in on this.....
QUOTE]
No offence intended, you gotta be pretty darn naive to think the MB 3.7 is the same engine as the Jeep 3.7 V6
MB pros on the board here, feel free to chime in on this.....
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02 ML320, 06 E350
isnt it odd that mercedes used the 3.7 liter jeep engine for only a few years in 1 car model? why would mercedes spend the money to develop a 3.7 liter engine to only use for a few years and in 1 model of car? it is much cheaper to barrow a motor design from the chrysler group that is all ready been designed and built. so far on my research all the specs look to be about the same expt for HP rating which can be changed with a simple reprograming of the computer or possible different intakes. go out and about and prove me wrong or if you can come up with a theory/answer why mercedes spent money/time making a 3.7 liter engine for 1 model and only used it for a few years share it with us.
#14
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
School bus
Originally Posted by BiTurboV12 AMG
isnt it odd that mercedes used the 3.7 liter jeep engine for only a few years in 1 car model? why would mercedes spend the money to develop a 3.7 liter engine to only use for a few years and in 1 model of car? it is much cheaper to barrow a motor design from the chrysler group that is all ready been designed and built. so far on my research all the specs look to be about the same expt for HP rating which can be changed with a simple reprograming of the computer or possible different intakes. go out and about and prove me wrong or if you can come up with a theory/answer why mercedes spent money/time making a 3.7 liter engine for 1 model and only used it for a few years share it with us.
Here go read up on the Jeep's motor!!
http://www.allpar.com/mopar/37.html
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02 ML320, 06 E350
grow up and dont call people ****ing dumb. this topic is over until you can learn to act in a civilized manor. you win the on S class issue,the reason they put it in the old s class was to get rid of the old s class and make room for the new ones.
Last edited by BiTurboV12 AMG; 09-01-2005 at 11:52 PM.
#16
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
School bus
Originally Posted by BiTurboV12 AMG
grow up and dont call people ****ing dumb. this topic is over until you can learn to act in a civilized manor. you win the on S class issue,the reason they put it in the old s class was to get rid of the old s class and make room for the new ones.
life is less than civilzed these days, deal with it!
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02 ML320, 06 E350
You must be a democrat always right and everyone one else is wrong, and quick to start playing the name game when your wrong.
Last edited by BiTurboV12 AMG; 09-02-2005 at 03:34 AM.
#18
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
School bus
Originally Posted by BiTurboV12 AMG
You must be a democrat always right and everyone one else is wrong, and quick to start playing the name game when your wrong.
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NYC/NJ.
Posts: 3,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W209 - W163
The only thing I hate about the ML is the freakin rattling in the rear cargo area, every bump rattles the hell out of my truck and its so annoying. Even my girl's Xterra is quiter, not to mention my Toyota Corolla rental car. I will never buy another W163 again. The interior quality of that truck is so low.