OHH-K, I am beginning to wonder if the ML500 is a good buy or a really bad investment
Does ML really stand for My Lemon. Should I just buy an MDX just like what the other post said?? Or is it only the Pre-2001's MLs that have problems.
I don't know, I really like the Benz name. I never owned a benz and I though that the ML would be the first. I have owned mainly BMW's, AUDI's and Porsche, mainly German Cars. I am getting all too concern because yesterday I changed the oil on my 2001 BMW and found a GM transmission with a Mopar driveshaft. WTF?!? So, I dont know any more....
Any inputs???
Personally I and probably the rest of the board appreciate some comments about what is happening, but excessive flaming such as what is happening right now is not right. One posts once or twice about something, not ten thousand times in any ML post - saying that it is a bad car, etc.
That way they scare away potential ML buyers and current owners, and the truth is that these people represent a small amount of the ML owners. Take these couple of posters out of the hundreds of thousands of ML owners, and you see that they represent only a small percentage of the owners, but by posting tons of posts, they get their point across - that they hate MB design, etc. and that's good for them. If the idea is to help, then they should help, but instead of that, they go on a crusade to dissuade all ML owners / potential owners to keep/buy an ML.
I can guarantee that if anyone did that in a BMW forum, there would be instantaneous uproar, with hundreds of flame posts. MB forums are generally more open, with less brand-crazy people, so there aren't any uproars like that, but that doesn't mean that BMW's are necessarily good and MB's are necessarily bad - just a difference in the type of person posting on the forums.
Getting back on topic, most of the problems in the ML were in the '98 and '99, as well as some in the '00 model years. Those types of problems in '01's, '02's and '03s are much much rarer, with only a few occurrences.
So if you are happy with your ML, be happy and keep it. Don't let these storms of messages affect that.
Regarding the use of other companies' parts, BMW does use GM transmissions. MB, OTOH, uses their own components and in fact sells transmissions, etc. to other companies. For example, the Jaguar mid-size sedan high performance version (forgot the name) uses an MB transmission. Also the Porsche 911 (996) uses MB transmissions.
Hope it helps.
Certainly the basic engine / tranny is reasonably sound (I say this despite having my MB made tranny changed in my Porsche 996 at 4,000 miles).
But what is unacceptable are the miriad of minor problems - the newer year models are better (01, 02's) - but even they have their bugs and as they age doubtless more will become apparent.
Also practically every ML owner I've spoken to at work has had at least one warranty claim for one or more of the many well known bugs.
The ones who've had no problems say something like 'my ML has been perfect - apart from xyz !!
I'm sorry but the ML has damaged the MB brand generally and turned alot of purchasers off.
Like the original poster, I've always bought 'premium' german cars and this was my first MB - needless to say it's my last :-(
True, it may have been fixed for the 03's but like the above post said, it won't be apparent as because they are still new.
I know there is no such thing as a perfect truck or car. I thought when I bought my $40K BMW that it would be very nice. Apparently not. E46 BMW's are one of the worst purchases that I have ever made. Too many problems, BMW dealers with bad attitudes, Too many GM,MOPAR and I would not be surprised if I see a DAEWOO stamp on one of the control arms. Not to mention that range of people who own these cars are Shallow, "Wanna-be" ghetto superstars with money (Mostly kids by the way). .... any how I can go on and on about how bad this car is but I am just trying to make sure that I dont start all over again but this time I am sinking $50K on a ML500.
You might like to check out the dealer to make sure they're competent at maintaining it - some of my problems were undoubtedly compounded by their poor workmanship.
With any luck you'll get a good one and have a good dealer - I suspect the odds are in your favor.
But remember spending 50k is no guarantee of a perfect truck (is there such a beast as a perfect truck of any brand ?) - Also, as I've found out and the depreciation is a little steeper than might be expected for an MB.
Tim
I also have a 2000 CLK320. Exactly the same story, except I bought it from another dealer. That dealer was...terrible. In fact, it generated a six page letter to the Pres. of MB Canada. The car, however, is great. Again - no failures, just two rattles that my new dealer fixed happily.
Anyways.. buying new? Not sure.. take another look at "almost new" (but make sure you get low milage.. you'll need it to be in warranty period)

I like mine.. though it has suffered the standard problems common to every ML. While I do enjoy driving it, this is my first and last *ML* I owned (I do not want to exclude the whole MB line quite yet)
But don't let this discourage you.. the research you're doing right now is very commendable.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
this is my first and last *ML*
. Just as I have my first born, I said exactly what everyone says about their ML, "this is my first and last *ML*"
I appreciate your input, YOU are absolutely right, buying a car is the worst investment next to having Children
. Just as I have my first born, I said exactly what everyone says about their ML, "this is my first and last *ML*"
http://www.mercedes-lemon.com
http://www.troublebenz.com
Good luck with whatever vehicle you choose!
Listen, the problems with the Ml are not virtual. These trucks are not built as tough as Mb would like them to be. However, if you buy, get the latest possible year. Get a new 2002 or 2003 and the said problems become almost inexistent. The you get 4yrs/50K FREE service (in US), lifetime roadside assistance, tons of hidden safety engineering, full time 4wd with lots of electronic trickery (MDX is not full time, I understand), timing chain instead of belt whic requires expensice replacement every 60-100K, etc, etc, etc. When people complain about the ML, they don't care to talk about the tons of safety and thoughtfull (and sometimes not so thoughtful) engineering that went into the ML. It is, BTW, the oldest of the midsize lux. SUV's, so it's sorely due for a makeover. But it is still the best value in the market. Get a MY02 or 03. If buying used, get MB Starmaekrd low mileage vehicle and don't go lower than MY00.
1. PSE module replaced to correct an audio lock-out problem. The module is part of the phone kit. i.e. No phone kit, no problem.
2. Replaced a leaky windshield washing fluid reservoir.
No major drivetrain/engine problem. I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
just to add my 2 cents to the conversation....i've had an 00 ML430 and now own a 02 ML500 and i haven't had any problems.....ZERO!!! mercedes has these vehicles nailed down pretty well now. drive an ML 500 and you will probably be all smiles. tons of power along with a comfortable ride can't be beat.
We have a 22' Searay and it's like night and day in comparison to our 98' Pathfinder we used to have. Not only does it get the job done as a truck, but it looks damn good doing it. I have nothing but high regards for the design and capabilities of this vehicle.
The vehicle has about 54k miles and I plan on seeing well over 100k before I think twice about parting with it.
(side note) My father had a 1982 300CD Turbo that I inherited when I went off to college. It turned 200k when I was driving it. Even though at the time it was over 15 years old and a diesel, all of my friends were envious of her classis beauty and sweet lines.
Although they certainly don't build them like they used to, I love Mercedes!
I'm convinced if the ML was 100% German the problems would be far less.
Practically all off my problems have been domestic component quality related or just poor assembly.... Then aggravated by dealer incompetence (Hoehn @ Carlsbad California).
Great design / concept but could have been executed better...
Last edited by timdf; Dec 1, 2002 at 12:59 AM.






