2006 and 2012 side by side pics
Some pics from Thanksgiving day of my sister's car.





Still haven't put the new grill and led tails yet though. Strange how the 2012 is actually bigger than the old while looks smaller.
Last edited by yister; Nov 25, 2011 at 05:17 AM.

I would be interested in your take of the difference in the two with regard to handeling, power, quaility of fitment, etc.
THhanks again for the pic's.
Mark
Last edited by MAmendola; Nov 25, 2011 at 08:17 AM.
The wheels are the 22" gl550 reps BTW.
The wheels are the 22" gl550 reps BTW.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




alll fours 20x10 et50
tires, Pirelli scorpions 285/35/22
On the car for 2 weeks, see my other post on w164/barely put 200 miles on them.
I didn't cheap out on the tires like the vendors on ebay. They balanced out fine, no vibrations what so ever. If I was single, I would definetly keep them. But I'm not, so priorities changed a bit. When I was looking for the OE ml63s, I just couldn't find a good set of them/non refurb. But 2 weeks after I got the 22 reps, I found a perfect used set with 90% tires of course. The 22's look really, really good.
My personal vote between the two is on the old model.
Much more ML.
Less fussy, less chrome, less angles, less lines and did I say less chrome bits?
I was browsing at the dealer last week while my 164 was in for service before catching a flight out of town. I just can't get over the back end of the 166 and its tail lights. And they now all come with chrome in the front and back. Great if you love chrome. Horrible if you don't.
Not to cause a stir with those who love chrome. It looks good on some vehicles. Personally, I just like my vehicles without it. And MB is not giving folks that option.
My personal vote between the two is on the old model.
Much more ML.
Less fussy, less chrome, less angles, less lines and did I say less chrome bits?
I was browsing at the dealer last week while my 164 was in for service before catching a flight out of town. I just can't get over the back end of the 166 and its tail lights. And they now all come with chrome in the front and back. Great if you love chrome. Horrible if you don't.
Not to cause a stir with those who love chrome. It looks good on some vehicles. Personally, I just like my vehicles without it. And MB is not giving folks that option.
I must be honest. I never liked the M-Class and then they made the W166 and I just fell head over heels in love. I was originally looking at the GLK because I didn't want something big but the ML I have today was in the showroom and just swept me off my feet. I couldn't get out my checkbook fast enough. I am really in love with her.
I seem to be outnumbered, but I really love all the chrome accents on the new W166 too. To each her own I guess.




