M-Class (W166) Produced 2012-2015

Which ML has more comfortable suspension: W166 or W164?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2012 | 10:04 AM
  #1  
Taleh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Which ML has more comfortable suspension: W166 or W164?

Which ML has more comfortable suspension: W166 or W164? If both cars have airmatic and 18 inch rims, then which car would be more comfortable on potholed roads?
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2012 | 01:45 PM
  #2  
GregW / Oregon's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,765
Likes: 1,260
From: Lake Oswego, OR
2020 GLE 450; 2023 BMW M2 Coupe
Airmatic performance

Originally Posted by Taleh
Which ML has more comfortable suspension: W166 or W164? If both cars have airmatic and 18 inch rims, then which car would be more comfortable on potholed roads?
Don't think there are many W166 Airmatics out there yet. I have the W164 which is quite comfortable. The W166 should be better due to:
  • Improved Adaptive Damping System (ADS)
  • Stiffer chassis
  • Active Curve System, when so equipped

The last, which is part of the US Dynamic Handling Package, decouples the two halves of the antiroll bars in straight ahead and off-road driving, allowing freer suspension travel. Of course, that package has 20" rims, though larger cross-section tires than the W164, so there would be a very slight compromise in that regard.

Further chassis/suspension information here: http://media.daimler.com/dcmedia/0-9...=1327862172411



PS...If you add your location to your profile it will help people tailor their responses to your posts.

Last edited by GregW / Oregon; Jan 29, 2012 at 01:51 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2012 | 11:37 PM
  #3  
dgiturbo's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 898
Likes: 9
From: Woodstock, IL
His 2019 RAM Cummins Turbo Diesel Laramie; Her's 2007 ML320 CDI P3; Mine BMW R1200R
My 164 has the Airmatic suspension. When I test drove a 166BT, it (and all I could find on the net within a 500 mile radius) had the regular suspension.
My opinion, the regular suspension on the 166 rides very comparable to my Airmatic. Not sure if its the Agility Control feature or new engineering but I was impressed.
Would love to try the Airmatic and Lighting on the 166 if I could find one.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 10:37 AM
  #4  
YYZ-E55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 20
From: Toronto
MY17 E43 Matte Selenite/Macchiato Beige, MY16 GLE350d Tenorite/Crystal Grey, MY17 B250
Lots of AIRMATIC equipped W166 MLs up here in Canada (about 25% sold with the sport package). All are on 20s so not exactly comparable to your request with respect to 18s, however, the ride is very similar to the W164 with AIRMATIC though the chassis is much tighter and more responsive on the W166.

If comfort is your only concern (not handling), the two generations are essentially on par I'd argue. The 18" wheel is going to kill any handling you might have enjoyed.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 12:10 PM
  #5  
caf's Avatar
caf
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 119
Likes: 3
From: Indianapolis
car
Originally Posted by YYZ-E55
Lots of AIRMATIC equipped W166 MLs up here in Canada (about 25% sold with the sport package). All are on 20s so not exactly comparable to your request with respect to 18s, however, the ride is very similar to the W164 with AIRMATIC though the chassis is much tighter and more responsive on the W166.

If comfort is your only concern (not handling), the two generations are essentially on par I'd argue. The 18" wheel is going to kill any handling you might have enjoyed.
Given equally grippy tires, 18" wheels will usually result in better handling than 20" wheels. Lower overall unsprung weight is why. You'll also get better acceleration with an 18" wheel (smaller flywheel effect), and a better ride.

20" wheels are just for show (and yeah, I agree, they do look good). Most of the time manufacturers package the bigger wheels with high performance summer only tires, which certainly have a lot more grip.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 12:19 PM
  #6  
mb techman's Avatar
Super Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 835
Likes: 9
CLA45
.

Last edited by mb techman; Sep 23, 2014 at 07:00 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 01:04 PM
  #7  
YYZ-E55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 20
From: Toronto
MY17 E43 Matte Selenite/Macchiato Beige, MY16 GLE350d Tenorite/Crystal Grey, MY17 B250
Originally Posted by caf
Given equally grippy tires, 18" wheels will usually result in better handling than 20" wheels. Lower overall unsprung weight is why. You'll also get better acceleration with an 18" wheel (smaller flywheel effect), and a better ride.

20" wheels are just for show (and yeah, I agree, they do look good). Most of the time manufacturers package the bigger wheels with high performance summer only tires, which certainly have a lot more grip.
How is a narrower 18" wheel/tire combo plus a taller sidewall going to lead to better handling versus a 20"? The 18" will definitely give you a plusher ride, but spongy in the corners due to the sidewalls.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 02:06 PM
  #8  
caf's Avatar
caf
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 119
Likes: 3
From: Indianapolis
car
Originally Posted by YYZ-E55
How is a narrower 18" wheel/tire combo plus a taller sidewall going to lead to better handling versus a 20"? The 18" will definitely give you a plusher ride, but spongy in the corners due to the sidewalls.
I should probably have been more specific. Beefier, wider tires will give you more grip on perfect roads. Given equal quality of materials, though, a 17" wheel/tire combo will be lighter and that decrease in unsprung weight will mean better handling on less than perfect roads (which = real roads, at least in my area).

Anyway, stiff sidewalls in higher profile tires can compensate pretty well for lower profile tires. Check out the best handling cars in the world, F1 cars. They use 13" wheels and probably higher profile tires than many street cars. Of course, the sidewalls are incredibly stiff.

On some of the Porsche/track forums I frequent, the consensus is pretty clear that bigger is not always better when it comes to wheel sizes.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2024 | 11:19 AM
  #9  
Audi Junkie's Avatar
Super Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 783
Likes: 108
From: PA
E Coupe C207, ML W166, ML W164, Sprinter 1500/144, W111 SB220 Fintail(s), A5 chassis Beetle 5+5
Wider tires kill steering feel
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2024 | 12:12 AM
  #10  
rapidoxidation's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 880
From: In the Shadow of the Tetons
2013 ML350 Bluetec
Outstanding zombie bump.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2024 | 07:47 AM
  #11  
Audi Junkie's Avatar
Super Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 783
Likes: 108
From: PA
E Coupe C207, ML W166, ML W164, Sprinter 1500/144, W111 SB220 Fintail(s), A5 chassis Beetle 5+5
Originally Posted by rapidoxidation
Outstanding zombie bump.
At least you learned something...I guess.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2024 | 10:23 AM
  #12  
rapidoxidation's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 880
From: In the Shadow of the Tetons
2013 ML350 Bluetec
Yes, I learned your opinion on wider tires.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:51 AM.