Mark this thread as Unsold
2004 CL600 FS ..PICS....29k miles AMG
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 590
Likes: 4
1987 Buick GNX,SL65 Black, 1987 Buick Turbo Limited, 2010 GT500
2004 CL600 FS ..PICS....29k miles AMG
$33,500 OBO
ALL BOOKS AND RECORDS INCLUDING 2 KEYS I HAVE
Iridium silver with black interior AMG Pkg.
Non-smoker with mint interior and exterior-----
I am selling this car for my brother...damn good looking car with great options....
Keyless Go and AMG package and Nav
New tires just put on....zero issues with this car...great service history
I have sold cars on here before.. my reputation speaks for itself
Less then 250 of these cars per year were brought to the states...they were special order cars only to the dealers
please call me at 954-548-7706 Mark
this is one of the lowest mile ones left for sale in the USA....a lot of car for the money COMPARED to many other cars ....
ALL BOOKS AND RECORDS INCLUDING 2 KEYS I HAVE
Iridium silver with black interior AMG Pkg.
Non-smoker with mint interior and exterior-----
I am selling this car for my brother...damn good looking car with great options....
Keyless Go and AMG package and Nav
New tires just put on....zero issues with this car...great service history
I have sold cars on here before.. my reputation speaks for itself
Less then 250 of these cars per year were brought to the states...they were special order cars only to the dealers
please call me at 954-548-7706 Mark
this is one of the lowest mile ones left for sale in the USA....a lot of car for the money COMPARED to many other cars ....
Last edited by retardedmunk; Sep 25, 2009 at 06:30 PM.
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 590
Likes: 4
1987 Buick GNX,SL65 Black, 1987 Buick Turbo Limited, 2010 GT500
car is still available
I will throw in a set of new CL65 wheels and tires for the car....
This is an incredible car for the money...
those who are not familiar with this car..it is the most reliable and easiest to tune...v12's are almost zero problems...based on a mercedes survey compared to the v8's.....an easy 680hp and over 750 lbs of torque can be made with this car for under $1000.00 this is reliable hp ....
less then 1000 of these cars were built in the 2003-2006 years...
own a car not everyone has....compared to a E55 or G37 on the same price range this car is superior.....by far
the guys who spend $60k on a C63 makes me cringe...the cars have no keyless and look like a jacked up C class...basically a cheap Benz with a big motor....sorry but I had to say this....
This is an incredible car for the money...
those who are not familiar with this car..it is the most reliable and easiest to tune...v12's are almost zero problems...based on a mercedes survey compared to the v8's.....an easy 680hp and over 750 lbs of torque can be made with this car for under $1000.00 this is reliable hp ....
less then 1000 of these cars were built in the 2003-2006 years...
own a car not everyone has....compared to a E55 or G37 on the same price range this car is superior.....by far
the guys who spend $60k on a C63 makes me cringe...the cars have no keyless and look like a jacked up C class...basically a cheap Benz with a big motor....sorry but I had to say this....
Trending Topics
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 26
From: Maryland
Eurocharged 2004 E500, Eurocharged ECU/TCU 2005 SL600, 2010 Caddy SwaggerWagon
The CL is probably the sexiest coupe ever made. The interior absolutely crushes any C-Class, C63 included. However I'm not fond of the years that had the small CD-based NAVI.
Super Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 960
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY & SE England
A Mercedes obviously!
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 590
Likes: 4
1987 Buick GNX,SL65 Black, 1987 Buick Turbo Limited, 2010 GT500
I got over $30k
As a part time dealer I see all kinds of cars....cars most guys on here barely see or drive depending on where they live...AMG's are stupid rare in many parts of the world....all I can say is the only car I own and like to drive is a 65 or v12 period....though the ClS55 is also a fav of mine...not saying the other AMG's are bad but the C63? no way in hell....I would buy a E63 or CLS63 ...by far better looking cars and much cooler in design and function....
THE C63 reminds me of a late model GTO with an insane drug molested MSRP...$67k???? what? I can buy a GTR,S65,CTS-V,CLS63...etc. .....get a better ride and still have loot in the bank.....
I wouldnt buy a C63 unless it was in the high $20k range...they will be there in a year....the car does nothing for me.....I recently picked up a 2006 S65 for close to $40k....100x the car the C63 is...power...looks and RARITY......the C class is simply the lowest bottom of the barrel Benz with a big motor.....also a common rental car....not much in engineering in that car....the engine in the 65 is the world's most powerful engine put in a passenger car...reliable too boot.....sorry but when I go to a restaurant I like to order the Chef special not the hot dog and fries...
WHEN I someone driving a C63...ALL I say to myself it "another sucker".........they could of had a mind blowing AMG ...but was sold on the cracker jack toy
THE C63 reminds me of a late model GTO with an insane drug molested MSRP...$67k???? what? I can buy a GTR,S65,CTS-V,CLS63...etc. .....get a better ride and still have loot in the bank.....
I wouldnt buy a C63 unless it was in the high $20k range...they will be there in a year....the car does nothing for me.....I recently picked up a 2006 S65 for close to $40k....100x the car the C63 is...power...looks and RARITY......the C class is simply the lowest bottom of the barrel Benz with a big motor.....also a common rental car....not much in engineering in that car....the engine in the 65 is the world's most powerful engine put in a passenger car...reliable too boot.....sorry but when I go to a restaurant I like to order the Chef special not the hot dog and fries...
WHEN I someone driving a C63...ALL I say to myself it "another sucker".........they could of had a mind blowing AMG ...but was sold on the cracker jack toy
Last edited by retardedmunk; Jan 9, 2010 at 12:33 AM.
Banned
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn
02 S500 Sport
As a part time dealer I see all kinds of cars....cars most guys on here barely see or drive depending on where they live...AMG's are stupid rare in many parts of the world....all I can say is the only car I own and like to drive is a 65 or v12 period....though the ClS55 is also a fav of mine...not saying the other AMG's are bad but the C63? no way in hell....I would buy a E63 or CLS63 ...by far better looking cars and much cooler in design and function....
THE C63 reminds me of a late model GTO with an insane drug molested MSRP...$67k???? what? I can buy a GTR,S65,CTS-V,CLS63...etc. .....get a better ride and still have loot in the bank.....
I wouldnt buy a C63 unless it was in the high $20k range...they will be there in a year....the car does nothing for me.....I recently picked up a 2006 S65 for close to $40k....100x the car the C63 is...power...looks and RARITY......the C class is simply the lowest bottom of the barrel Benz with a big motor.....also a common rental car....not much in engineering in that car....the engine in the 65 is the world's most powerful engine put in a passenger car...reliable too boot.....sorry but when I go to a restaurant I like to order the Chef special not the hot dog and fries...
WHEN I someone driving a C63...ALL I say to myself it "another sucker".........they could of had a mind blowing AMG ...but was sold on the cracker jack toy
THE C63 reminds me of a late model GTO with an insane drug molested MSRP...$67k???? what? I can buy a GTR,S65,CTS-V,CLS63...etc. .....get a better ride and still have loot in the bank.....
I wouldnt buy a C63 unless it was in the high $20k range...they will be there in a year....the car does nothing for me.....I recently picked up a 2006 S65 for close to $40k....100x the car the C63 is...power...looks and RARITY......the C class is simply the lowest bottom of the barrel Benz with a big motor.....also a common rental car....not much in engineering in that car....the engine in the 65 is the world's most powerful engine put in a passenger car...reliable too boot.....sorry but when I go to a restaurant I like to order the Chef special not the hot dog and fries...
WHEN I someone driving a C63...ALL I say to myself it "another sucker".........they could of had a mind blowing AMG ...but was sold on the cracker jack toy
What do you think about the 335i. Tell me in PM if you want
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: Hoboken,NJ
09 Eurocharged C63 AMG
As a part time dealer I see all kinds of cars....cars most guys on here barely see or drive depending on where they live...AMG's are stupid rare in many parts of the world....all I can say is the only car I own and like to drive is a 65 or v12 period....though the ClS55 is also a fav of mine...not saying the other AMG's are bad but the C63? no way in hell....I would buy a E63 or CLS63 ...by far better looking cars and much cooler in design and function....
THE C63 reminds me of a late model GTO with an insane drug molested MSRP...$67k???? what? I can buy a GTR,S65,CTS-V,CLS63...etc. .....get a better ride and still have loot in the bank.....
I wouldnt buy a C63 unless it was in the high $20k range...they will be there in a year....the car does nothing for me.....I recently picked up a 2006 S65 for close to $40k....100x the car the C63 is...power...looks and RARITY......the C class is simply the lowest bottom of the barrel Benz with a big motor.....also a common rental car....not much in engineering in that car....the engine in the 65 is the world's most powerful engine put in a passenger car...reliable too boot.....sorry but when I go to a restaurant I like to order the Chef special not the hot dog and fries...
WHEN I someone driving a C63...ALL I say to myself it "another sucker".........they could of had a mind blowing AMG ...but was sold on the cracker jack toy
THE C63 reminds me of a late model GTO with an insane drug molested MSRP...$67k???? what? I can buy a GTR,S65,CTS-V,CLS63...etc. .....get a better ride and still have loot in the bank.....
I wouldnt buy a C63 unless it was in the high $20k range...they will be there in a year....the car does nothing for me.....I recently picked up a 2006 S65 for close to $40k....100x the car the C63 is...power...looks and RARITY......the C class is simply the lowest bottom of the barrel Benz with a big motor.....also a common rental car....not much in engineering in that car....the engine in the 65 is the world's most powerful engine put in a passenger car...reliable too boot.....sorry but when I go to a restaurant I like to order the Chef special not the hot dog and fries...
WHEN I someone driving a C63...ALL I say to myself it "another sucker".........they could of had a mind blowing AMG ...but was sold on the cracker jack toy
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,049
Likes: 2
W204
This is retarded, the comments you post about the c63 is retarded.
Have you ever even driven one for more than a day?
You are compairing a 2004 car to a 2009?
Also its not about the HP, its about power to weight ratio.
Have you ever even driven one for more than a day?
You are compairing a 2004 car to a 2009?
Also its not about the HP, its about power to weight ratio.
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: Hoboken,NJ
09 Eurocharged C63 AMG
Put his phone number in google and you will see his agenda.
Banned
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn
02 S500 Sport
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 590
Likes: 4
1987 Buick GNX,SL65 Black, 1987 Buick Turbo Limited, 2010 GT500
Lol---then c63's are for Girly men? JK
Yeah 3 series certainly are for girls as well as C350's and C300's and C63's are for those who just dont know about the big boy cars.....C63's are overpriced toys....and my opinion will not change ....I have had well over 500 miles of seat time in one...
I have a dealer license it is not what I do full time....I dont drive all the cars I buy...some are not driven at all by me and others I drive until they sell....
I can understand and see why the C63 guys chimed in.....no reason to defend
anything...opinions are like *******s we all have one...so my opinion shouldnt get your panties in a bunch
I was comparing a 2004 to a 2008 or 2009? And this means what? Back in 2004 Mercedes was building **** cars? lol They are 2 different cars...but one is superior....and power to weight ratio?
The CL600 is not much heavier and it is 10x the car a C63 is IMO
Does it matter? Who here likes to play slalom with cars on the street?
In other words stop and go and cruising is the most any of these cars will allow. In everyday driving a CL600 will do just what any C63 would but much more comfortable and much quicker....and for the money a C63 costs used ..a S65 OR cl65 OR cl600 or CLS55 or E63 is 10x the car...as simple as that....
I have a dealer license it is not what I do full time....I dont drive all the cars I buy...some are not driven at all by me and others I drive until they sell....
I can understand and see why the C63 guys chimed in.....no reason to defend
anything...opinions are like *******s we all have one...so my opinion shouldnt get your panties in a bunch
I was comparing a 2004 to a 2008 or 2009? And this means what? Back in 2004 Mercedes was building **** cars? lol They are 2 different cars...but one is superior....and power to weight ratio?
The CL600 is not much heavier and it is 10x the car a C63 is IMO
Does it matter? Who here likes to play slalom with cars on the street?
In other words stop and go and cruising is the most any of these cars will allow. In everyday driving a CL600 will do just what any C63 would but much more comfortable and much quicker....and for the money a C63 costs used ..a S65 OR cl65 OR cl600 or CLS55 or E63 is 10x the car...as simple as that....
Last edited by retardedmunk; Jan 15, 2010 at 02:54 PM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,049
Likes: 2
W204
Yeah 3 series certainly are for girls as well as C350's and C300's and C63's are for those who just dont know about the big boy cars.....C63's are overpriced toys....and my opinion will not change ....I have had well over 500 miles of seat time in one...
I have a dealer license it is not what I do full time....I dont drive all the cars I buy...some are not driven at all by me and others I drive until they sell....
I can understand and see why the C63 guys chimed in.....no reason to defend
anything...opinions are like *******s we all have one...so my opinion shouldnt get your panties in a bunch
I was comparing a 2004 to a 2008 or 2009? And this means what? Back in 2004 Mercedes was building **** cars? lol They are 2 different cars...but one is superior....and power to weight ratio?
The CL600 is not much heavier and it is 10x the car a C63 is IMO
Does it matter? Who here likes to play slalom with cars on the street?
In other words stop and go and cruising is the most any of these cars will allow. In everyday driving a CL600 will do just what any C63 would but much more comfortable and much quicker....and for the money a C63 costs used ..a S65 OR cl65 OR cl600 or CLS55 or E63 is 10x the car...as simple as that....
I have a dealer license it is not what I do full time....I dont drive all the cars I buy...some are not driven at all by me and others I drive until they sell....
I can understand and see why the C63 guys chimed in.....no reason to defend
anything...opinions are like *******s we all have one...so my opinion shouldnt get your panties in a bunch
I was comparing a 2004 to a 2008 or 2009? And this means what? Back in 2004 Mercedes was building **** cars? lol They are 2 different cars...but one is superior....and power to weight ratio?
The CL600 is not much heavier and it is 10x the car a C63 is IMO
Does it matter? Who here likes to play slalom with cars on the street?
In other words stop and go and cruising is the most any of these cars will allow. In everyday driving a CL600 will do just what any C63 would but much more comfortable and much quicker....and for the money a C63 costs used ..a S65 OR cl65 OR cl600 or CLS55 or E63 is 10x the car...as simple as that....
You're an idiot.
Sorry it is true mercedes doesnt make as good cars back then they are always improving also have fun with fixing your car every few months.
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 590
Likes: 4
1987 Buick GNX,SL65 Black, 1987 Buick Turbo Limited, 2010 GT500
I dont think so
after all the cars I have owned....I have hardly had any major problems....sorry to burst your bubble....infact I WOULD have to say my Mercedes have been in the shop less then my previous LEXUS'S
Mercedes is always improving or are they? Take a good look at the new E class..it has the generic rear of most cars...IE a Honda...yes the tech the car is great and it is a great piece of engineering but in the style department they have gone backwards on that one....as well as taking a lot of interior from the C class ....which I think it was a mistake when adding thousands to a MSRP over a car from a lower level...
As for the C63....what exactly is an imrovement? A N/A engine...plastic interior without even keyless go and a nut and bolt exterior compared to a Chevrolet Cobalt in body paneling and fit and finish.....sorry but Mercedes dumps all their money in the CL's and the S's ....these cars get the best of what they offer..AMG and so on......the rest of the cars are just not the same...and intended that way by corporate....
Mercedes is always improving or are they? Take a good look at the new E class..it has the generic rear of most cars...IE a Honda...yes the tech the car is great and it is a great piece of engineering but in the style department they have gone backwards on that one....as well as taking a lot of interior from the C class ....which I think it was a mistake when adding thousands to a MSRP over a car from a lower level...
As for the C63....what exactly is an imrovement? A N/A engine...plastic interior without even keyless go and a nut and bolt exterior compared to a Chevrolet Cobalt in body paneling and fit and finish.....sorry but Mercedes dumps all their money in the CL's and the S's ....these cars get the best of what they offer..AMG and so on......the rest of the cars are just not the same...and intended that way by corporate....
Super Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
'14 CLA 45
after all the cars I have owned....I have hardly had any major problems....sorry to burst your bubble....infact I WOULD have to say my Mercedes have been in the shop less then my previous LEXUS'S
Mercedes is always improving or are they? Take a good look at the new E class..it has the generic rear of most cars...IE a Honda...yes the tech the car is great and it is a great piece of engineering but in the style department they have gone backwards on that one....as well as taking a lot of interior from the C class ....which I think it was a mistake when adding thousands to a MSRP over a car from a lower level...
As for the C63....what exactly is an imrovement? A N/A engine...plastic interior without even keyless go and a nut and bolt exterior compared to a Chevrolet Cobalt in body paneling and fit and finish.....sorry but Mercedes dumps all their money in the CL's and the S's ....these cars get the best of what they offer..AMG and so on......the rest of the cars are just not the same...and intended that way by corporate....
Mercedes is always improving or are they? Take a good look at the new E class..it has the generic rear of most cars...IE a Honda...yes the tech the car is great and it is a great piece of engineering but in the style department they have gone backwards on that one....as well as taking a lot of interior from the C class ....which I think it was a mistake when adding thousands to a MSRP over a car from a lower level...
As for the C63....what exactly is an imrovement? A N/A engine...plastic interior without even keyless go and a nut and bolt exterior compared to a Chevrolet Cobalt in body paneling and fit and finish.....sorry but Mercedes dumps all their money in the CL's and the S's ....these cars get the best of what they offer..AMG and so on......the rest of the cars are just not the same...and intended that way by corporate....
In the end it comes down to how much a person is enjoying their car, and from what I get from the C63 board, most everyone is happy with their purchase.
Besides, they might be looking for a more aggressive styling compared to a CLS63 or S55 AMG (this of course is a matter of one's opinion again). Maybe they do not like the bigger size of these two cars or just do not want to deal with extended warranties and such to early down the road and therefore decided for the C63.
Back to topic:
GLWS
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: Hoboken,NJ
09 Eurocharged C63 AMG
Yeah 3 series certainly are for girls as well as C350's and C300's and C63's are for those who just dont know about the big boy cars.....C63's are overpriced toys....and my opinion will not change ....I have had well over 500 miles of seat time in one...
I have a dealer license it is not what I do full time....I dont drive all the cars I buy...some are not driven at all by me and others I drive until they sell....
I can understand and see why the C63 guys chimed in.....no reason to defend
anything...opinions are like *******s we all have one...so my opinion shouldnt get your panties in a bunch
I was comparing a 2004 to a 2008 or 2009? And this means what? Back in 2004 Mercedes was building **** cars? lol They are 2 different cars...but one is superior....and power to weight ratio?
The CL600 is not much heavier and it is 10x the car a C63 is IMO
Does it matter? Who here likes to play slalom with cars on the street?
In other words stop and go and cruising is the most any of these cars will allow. In everyday driving a CL600 will do just what any C63 would but much more comfortable and much quicker....and for the money a C63 costs used ..a S65 OR cl65 OR cl600 or CLS55 or E63 is 10x the car...as simple as that....
I have a dealer license it is not what I do full time....I dont drive all the cars I buy...some are not driven at all by me and others I drive until they sell....
I can understand and see why the C63 guys chimed in.....no reason to defend
anything...opinions are like *******s we all have one...so my opinion shouldnt get your panties in a bunch
I was comparing a 2004 to a 2008 or 2009? And this means what? Back in 2004 Mercedes was building **** cars? lol They are 2 different cars...but one is superior....and power to weight ratio?
The CL600 is not much heavier and it is 10x the car a C63 is IMO
Does it matter? Who here likes to play slalom with cars on the street?
In other words stop and go and cruising is the most any of these cars will allow. In everyday driving a CL600 will do just what any C63 would but much more comfortable and much quicker....and for the money a C63 costs used ..a S65 OR cl65 OR cl600 or CLS55 or E63 is 10x the car...as simple as that....
Edmunds Curb Weight for 03 CL600: 4300lbs
You simply have no idea what your talking about.
Junior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
CL600
I'm going to have to say a v12 bi-turbo is better than a 6,3l 8cyl for highway driving which the CL is intended for. It's beyond obvious that you can throw a c63 around the track better than CL600, one is a 4 door sports sedan the other is a 2 door luxury grand touring coupe, on highway are you c63 guys really saying a c63 has a better highway drive than v12 bi-turbo? I don't think that's the debate lol...Either way both great cars
, love the oranges to apples comparison
Last edited by CL66; Jan 17, 2010 at 06:27 PM.
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 590
Likes: 4
1987 Buick GNX,SL65 Black, 1987 Buick Turbo Limited, 2010 GT500
my original argument
Is that at the cost of a C63...ridiculous for a car of its nature.....it is by no means a comparison to a CL600 or S65 or E63....meaning that the C63 is overrated .....I have a friend who not by my advice bought a C63 for close to $70k new and now is trying to get an S65 but the car is only worth $40-45k......
that is a bad hit on a car owned for only a year.....
as for weight ....there is a difference and again who drives their cars around like an F1 Indy car anyway? NOBODY....so the weight-handling is pointless as long as it doesnt roll around like a pickup
that is a bad hit on a car owned for only a year.....
as for weight ....there is a difference and again who drives their cars around like an F1 Indy car anyway? NOBODY....so the weight-handling is pointless as long as it doesnt roll around like a pickup
