Cayenne Turbo S against ML63AMG-AMS Cross Road comparison data.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
From: Toronto,ON
AMG
Cayenne Turbo S against ML63AMG-AMS Cross Road comparison data.
Cayenne Turbo S
0-100km/h: 5.3s
0-160km/h:12.1s
2540kg
ML 63 AMG
0-100km/h: 5.0s
0-160km/h:11.2s
2342kg
ML 63 was the clear winner for them...
Took it from the rennteam.com
That is very fast 0-100 mph for a truck!!!!!!
0-100km/h: 5.3s
0-160km/h:12.1s
2540kg
ML 63 AMG
0-100km/h: 5.0s
0-160km/h:11.2s
2342kg
ML 63 was the clear winner for them...
Took it from the rennteam.com
That is very fast 0-100 mph for a truck!!!!!!
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: California
SL500 /Porsche 997S/Porsche Cayenne Turbo
It will be interesting to see how the re-freshed 2008 Cayenne that is due out in early 2007 will compare with the ML63. Remember, the Cayenne came out in 2003 before the latest round of the horsepower wars began. So you are comparing a 2003 vintage design with a 2007 design.
Here are some of the rumors floating around:
Cayenne S : 4.8 l with 380 HP
- about 15-20 % less consumption
- new navigation system (larger screen, Ipod, may be Bluetooth)
- much improved driving feeling - comparable with 911
- improved dash board surface (without full leather)
Turbo will have at least 500 HP
Future Turbo S - ???????
Here are some of the rumors floating around:
Cayenne S : 4.8 l with 380 HP
- about 15-20 % less consumption
- new navigation system (larger screen, Ipod, may be Bluetooth)
- much improved driving feeling - comparable with 911
- improved dash board surface (without full leather)
Turbo will have at least 500 HP
Future Turbo S - ???????
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
From: OC, SoCal
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
It will be interesting to see how the re-freshed 2008 Cayenne that is due out in early 2007 will compare with the ML63. Remember, the Cayenne came out in 2003 before the latest round of the horsepower wars began. So you are comparing a 2003 vintage design with a 2007 design.
Trending Topics
Almost a Member!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
E46 M3 & Jeep SRT8 E60 M5 on order
the reason for the above post it that I know you guys don't want to hear it is that the Jeep SRT8 is not trail rated and therefore is approximatley 1,000 pounds lighther than the turbo and ML 63. Even though it has approximatley 90 less horsepower it sprints the above mentioned speed in the following times pursuant to the november issue of road and track:
4.8 to 100
11.1 to 160
the above times can't really be compared because is wasn't done on the same day and same conditions but it does give you a referance on the straight line stock performance of the Jeep SRT8
4.8 to 100
11.1 to 160
the above times can't really be compared because is wasn't done on the same day and same conditions but it does give you a referance on the straight line stock performance of the Jeep SRT8
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: California
SL500 /Porsche 997S/Porsche Cayenne Turbo
The point I was trying to make was that we have seen various vehicles climb to the top of the heap only to knocked off the top by the next latest greatest vehicle. The Cayenne Turbo was the first of the true "super" SUV's. The Cayenne Turbo S took it up a level. Now the ML63 has taken the lead in some measures of performance. It has not bested the Cayenne in handling or braking performance.
Will the next generation Cayenne, which is arriving a few short months from now, take it up another notch?
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 7
From: Cali
ML 63
According to the Jeep website, the SRT8 weighs 4819lbs. The crappiest Grand Cherokee 4*2 weighs 4216. So the weight difference between the ML and the SRt8 is only 200-400 lbs, not 1000 plus.
FZ
Almost a Member!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
E46 M3 & Jeep SRT8 E60 M5 on order
I guess that is for the 2007 - the 2006 weights about 4,700 pounds. o.k. . my mistake I should have worded that the ML weighs close to 400 pounds more than the jeep but the fact remains that I belive that the ML and turbo weight too much. and why are you picking on your little brother, be carefull the little brother might embarrash you
sorry
sorry
