NEW ML !!! Photos
#4
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Viña del Mar, Chile
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Porsche Turbo Stage 4, Cayenne S ... gone C43, C32, ML55 & Ducati 999.
Originally posted by ahopeter
is it just me... or does it look like there isnt that much of a difference?
is it just me... or does it look like there isnt that much of a difference?
engine...maybe the ML63....the new normaly aspi...V8 to replace the 55..or a simple ML55 with new tech 400hp I am guessing..
any way here are more ...photos:
![](http://www.maybach.ru/spy/ml4.jpg)
![](http://www.maybach.ru/spy/ml5.jpg)
![](http://www.maybach.ru/spy/ml6.jpg)
bye
![Cool](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif)
Last edited by Pierre32///AMG; 02-03-2004 at 03:23 AM.
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: North Cuba/West Bimini
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cars and boats!
Originally posted by Pierre32///AMG
I am agree...no too much change....
engine...maybe the ML63....the new normaly aspi...V8 to replace the 55..or a simple ML55 with new tech 400hp I am guessing..
any way here are more ...photos:
bye
I am agree...no too much change....
engine...maybe the ML63....the new normaly aspi...V8 to replace the 55..or a simple ML55 with new tech 400hp I am guessing..
any way here are more ...photos:
![](http://www.maybach.ru/spy/ml4.jpg)
![](http://www.maybach.ru/spy/ml5.jpg)
![](http://www.maybach.ru/spy/ml6.jpg)
bye
![Cool](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif)
Trending Topics
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 ML320
Originally posted by IluvS500
God, I hope they dont leave the tire on the back like that, it looks horrible
God, I hope they dont leave the tire on the back like that, it looks horrible
The current ML has/had (depending on where you are) an optional external spare tire carrier - package M4. This was discontinued in the US because if someone installs the third-row seats along with it, the safety level for the third-row passengers in case of a rear collision was not up to MBUSA standards.
Here's a photo of it:
![](http://www.4x4abc.com/images/M4_spr_tire.jpeg)