More results and pics upcoming.
Looking for W210 E55 S/C'ed Data
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 235
Likes: 1
2002 ML55, 2006 C6 Z06
Looking for W210 E55 S/C'ed Data
Just bought a 01 E55 this week and am planning on modifying it come March. I passed on getting a W211 E55 because I want a track toy as well, so a clean 01' it was, later I will get a nice Z06 in addition.
I am starting this thread in hopes of having one thread that helps identify who's Kit is the Best in Performance, Best in Value, and as well, Best in Durability/Reliability.
What I am looking for is SOLID INFORMATION on Super Charger kits available. Time slips are the prefered data, but other means of measurement are acceptable.
I know there are different MB camps whether it be "pro" Kleemann or "pro" HPS, so this thread isn't about arguing the design merits of either kit. (BTW, I am looking for info on the "New" HPS kit with the updated S/C'er, but older model data is welcome as well.)
This is a chance for the Tuner shops to post their own best data as well as Customer car data.
So down to the numbers, what are the typical as well as best 0-60 and 1/4 mile times.
Lets start with stock like my car is.
Best Times for a stock E55 = ???
Best Times for a Kleemann E55 = ???
Best Times for a HPS E55 = ???
Note: I realize that every car out there is a little different in setup and modifications, so please post car details as well so they can be taken into consideration.
Along the same lines, it is realized in advance that track differences can skew the results, differences can be taken into consideration as well.
I look forward to maximum participation.
I am starting this thread in hopes of having one thread that helps identify who's Kit is the Best in Performance, Best in Value, and as well, Best in Durability/Reliability.
What I am looking for is SOLID INFORMATION on Super Charger kits available. Time slips are the prefered data, but other means of measurement are acceptable.
I know there are different MB camps whether it be "pro" Kleemann or "pro" HPS, so this thread isn't about arguing the design merits of either kit. (BTW, I am looking for info on the "New" HPS kit with the updated S/C'er, but older model data is welcome as well.)
This is a chance for the Tuner shops to post their own best data as well as Customer car data.
So down to the numbers, what are the typical as well as best 0-60 and 1/4 mile times.
Lets start with stock like my car is.
Best Times for a stock E55 = ???
Best Times for a Kleemann E55 = ???
Best Times for a HPS E55 = ???
Note: I realize that every car out there is a little different in setup and modifications, so please post car details as well so they can be taken into consideration.
Along the same lines, it is realized in advance that track differences can skew the results, differences can be taken into consideration as well.
I look forward to maximum participation.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 1
From: Ventura County USA
'06 E55, '05 SLK55, a few others
Full test results of the Gen II HPS system on my 55 will be available after the 1st. It'll be a while before I get a chance to run it for time, but I'll have dyno charts. Never seen anyone post before and after dyno runs for Renntech, Kleeman, or anyone else for that matter. It's always "claimed" HP numbers. Guess I'll be the first. There is a W210 55 with full Renntech upgrades into the 11's! 
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 1
C32 AMG
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...=Kleemann+dyno
Here is a link to one of the past threads. Just do a search with "kleemann dyno", there are probably 10-15 dyno graphs from 2002 and 2003.
Here is a link to one of the past threads. Just do a search with "kleemann dyno", there are probably 10-15 dyno graphs from 2002 and 2003.
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 466
Likes: 32
My 2003 G55 put down 276.62 AWHP and 252.37 ft/lbs of torque on a 4 wheel dynojet when stock. With a Kleemann supercharger it put down 399.66 AWHP and 358.58 ft/lbs of torque on that same dyno. My G class has much more drivetrain loss than your E55, I figure it's about 30%. So, that would put me at about 520 crank HP. I've also run a 13.9 second 1/4 mile at 99 mps and my truck weighs 6,000 lbs. Kleemann's claims are very accurate in my opinion. I can E-Mail you a dyno chart if you're interested but for some reason I can't post it on this forum.
Trending Topics
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 1
From: North Cuba/West Bimini
Cars and boats!
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Dubai Tuner Gives the Mercedes G-Class An Entirely New Look
Verdad Gallardo
Six Gift Ideas Your AMG Loving Dad or Grad Will Cherish
7 Craziest Things AMG Gas Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 1
From: Ventura County USA
'06 E55, '05 SLK55, a few others
Don't really care for the Audi coolant tank on the pass. side with the blue cap. Originally a factory tank was located up against the drivers fender and looked really sano. Problem is, it kinked the hose to the cooler, and there's no way to change a headlight bulb if you have xenon's. Time prevented them from making that tank fit next to the stock radiator coolant tank, but my plan is to make that change myself.
