S-Class (W140) 1991-1999: 300 SD, S 350TD, 300 SE 2.8, S280, 300 SE 3.2, 300 SEL 3.2, S320, S320L, 400 SE, S420, 400 SEL, S420L, 500 SE, S500, 500 SEL, S500L, 600 SE, S600, 600 SEL, S600L, 500 SEC, 600 SEC

S420 vs S500

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-10-2006, 08:51 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Arnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
08 Lexus GS350 AWD. 08 Lexus RX350 AWD - wife's. 94 MBZ E320 - still have it.
S420 vs S500

Hi there. I had three different W124 in the last 10 years. My current car is a '94 E320. Once all the bug were out (oil leaks, head gasket, wiring harness), the car was excellent. But it's time to move on. I want to stick with MBZ, but the reliability issues of W210 or W220 are scaring me. Looks like Mercedes quality is no longer there. From what I understand, the W140 is the last Mercedes that was decently built.

So, W140 crowd, I need some education. I narrowed my field to two models: '98-99 S420 and S500. Which one is better that the other. Extra HP are irrelevant, I am 42 years old. So, I am after features and quality, not the extra performance. Also, what are the common problems on W140.

And the last one: what do you think about this one:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=4603841539

Thanks for your input.
Old 01-10-2006, 09:46 PM
  #2  
Member
 
Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
97 S500, 04 ML350
the w140 is one of the best MB had build, i went from a 420 to a 500, i like the 500 much better, the 500 has more refined interior, better leather and more power, the 420 on ebay looks good, very low K.
the w140 hase its share of problems as well. you have to get it checked by a good mechanic and make sure all service records are available.
good luck
Old 01-11-2006, 04:27 AM
  #3  
Super Member
 
BenzKid24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Granbury Texas(burbs of DFW)
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a Few Nice cars.
yeah go with the 500 if at all possible..the 420 is still a very nice car,but you wont get heated seats front and back or even the power back seat(i believe the 95-99 didnt make that standard)my car is in the shop for a few things which i will post whats that all details.
Old 01-12-2006, 02:50 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Arnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
08 Lexus GS350 AWD. 08 Lexus RX350 AWD - wife's. 94 MBZ E320 - still have it.
Thanks for the replies. Now, what about the long wheel base vs short what is the difference and which one is which.
Old 01-12-2006, 03:43 AM
  #5  
Super Member
 
BenzKid24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Granbury Texas(burbs of DFW)
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a Few Nice cars.
the s320 i think it the only SWB unless you special order for a shorter wheelbase...LWB is much more classy looking and looks more legit for a S class....just my $.02!!
Old 01-28-2006, 09:22 PM
  #6  
Member
 
nimski62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
S500 has HYDRAULIC suspension in the back which will give you a better ride, and the 420 does not
Old 01-31-2006, 12:51 AM
  #7  
Member
 
tbilisi79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 248
Received 42 Likes on 29 Posts
The HP difference is not that big between 420 and 500. 275 vs 315.
But with 420, you dont have to worry about the rear shocks, as they are not hydroulic, and they will not cost $500 each, plus accumulators $190 both.
I own a 82 500 SEL, and I love the power of a 325HP motor, but I think the S420 is a better buy for the money.
96-99 S420 and S500 have a 5-speed tranny which helps a lot around town and on the freeway.
If you are on a budget and want to get a w140, I think the 420 is the way to go, just cause it lacks the air shocks in the back.
Old 01-31-2006, 10:36 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Arnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
08 Lexus GS350 AWD. 08 Lexus RX350 AWD - wife's. 94 MBZ E320 - still have it.
Thanks again for replies. Tbilisi79, I hear you. I agree that staying simple will pay off in a long run.
Old 01-31-2006, 10:51 PM
  #9  
Super Member
 
BenzKid24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Granbury Texas(burbs of DFW)
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a Few Nice cars.
good debate, but since when did Mercedes owners "stay simple"? isnt that why we ride in these beasts to be "more" then just "simple". I understand budgets come and go but i was told along time ago if you cant afford the up keep of a benz,then dont buy one.
Old 01-31-2006, 11:09 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Arnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
08 Lexus GS350 AWD. 08 Lexus RX350 AWD - wife's. 94 MBZ E320 - still have it.
Well, that's exactly why I decided to stay away from W210 and W220, because I want to enjoy (means "drive") the car, instead of "affording keeping it up".
Old 02-01-2006, 09:02 AM
  #11  
Super Member
 
BenzKid24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Granbury Texas(burbs of DFW)
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a Few Nice cars.
the w220 wasnt very well thought of,poor marterials and well the rest is history...i hope you find the car of your dreams,the w140 is the best sedan ever.....ever.
Old 02-03-2006, 02:43 PM
  #12  
Super Member
 
EdzBenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 730
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
W210 W140
Maybe I'm wrong, but mine does not have hydraulic shocks in the back. It might be different because it came stock with 18's, but I guess I'll have to check.
Old 02-20-2006, 04:23 AM
  #13  
Super Member
 
stickygreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'97 E320
w210 is not an unreliable car by any means. I have almost 180k on my '97 E320 (inline-6) with no major problems and the car still runs good as new. Even the later v6/v8 motors have proven to be VERY reliable. The things to check for on those cars are rust (not common, but there are some cases of premature rust), head gasket leaks (inline-6), and that the crank hub recall was done, if applicable (v6/v8).

The w140 is a very solid machine, but some auxiliary items are known to fail and are VERY costly to replace (i.e. HVAC, hydraulic shocks, etc.). If low maintenance costs are your goal, I'd pick a w210 over a w140.

I have been thinking about upgrading to the w140, simply because of it's presence and feel...my personal preference would be a '97-'99 S320 SWB, but anything w/o an active rear suspension would do.

Raj
Old 02-20-2006, 05:39 AM
  #14  
Member
 
mercedesauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 CL600, 2006 SL65
1999 S420, Black

Originally Posted by Arnie
Hi there. I had three different W124 in the last 10 years. My current car is a '94 E320. Once all the bug were out (oil leaks, head gasket, wiring harness), the car was excellent. But it's time to move on. I want to stick with MBZ, but the reliability issues of W210 or W220 are scaring me. Looks like Mercedes quality is no longer there. From what I understand, the W140 is the last Mercedes that was decently built.

So, W140 crowd, I need some education. I narrowed my field to two models: '98-99 S420 and S500. Which one is better that the other. Extra HP are irrelevant, I am 42 years old. So, I am after features and quality, not the extra performance. Also, what are the common problems on W140.

And the last one: what do you think about this one:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=4603841539

Thanks for your input.


Hello,

I have for sale a nice 1999 S420, Black on Black, with 80K miles. If you choose to go with a S420 instead of the S500, and interested in the car, call me at 213-700-4447. The car is available for a full inspection and test drive.


P.S. Last 30K miles are mostly freeway miles between Los Angeles and Las Vegas, and were put on a car within a year, after i bought a home in Vegas.
Old 03-21-2006, 05:48 PM
  #15  
Almost a Member!
 
vulpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
98 SL500, 94 E320, 06 Corvette ZO6
These were great cars. I have a carbon copy car of the one that was on ebay. A smoke silver 99 S420 with 36,000 on it and the car is flawless. I still feel like I'm driving a $100,000 car whenever I'm in this automobile.

When stuff goes wrong however, it can be costly. AC evaporators are a common issue from what I hear, although I have had absolutely zero problems of any kind with mine.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: S420 vs S500



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:12 AM.