S-Class (W220) 1999-2006: S 320 CDI, S 320, S430, S 500, S 600

4.3L V8 vs. new 3.5L V6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-09-2004, 02:28 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
mkoesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4.3L V8 vs. new 3.5L V6

The new 3.5L V6 for the SLK appears to make the same power and torque as the 4.3L V8. In addition it makes more power and torque than the brand new 3.7L V6. What does this mean for the future of the latter two motors?
Old 01-09-2004, 08:09 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GDawgC220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,781
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
'05 A4 1.8TQM6
I believe that the 3.5 will slowly make it to the other models over time. I think that MB is also redesigning the V8's with 4 valves/cyl, pretty much same idea with the new V6, except incorporated into the V8's.

So my guess is that there will be a S350 and probably up'd HP on the 500 with new V8 possibly, but all guesses at this point. Time will tell.

-G-
Old 01-09-2004, 08:31 PM
  #3  
Super Member
 
Caliz_Finest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think theyre making a new V8 for the new S class when it comes out
Old 01-30-2004, 07:24 AM
  #4  
Newbie
 
Ru55e11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Datchet UK
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK320
New V8 Motor

I heard that the new V8 for the 500 cars was going to have 325HP and is reduced in capacity to 4.7 Litres.

This means that a naturally aspirated 5.4 Litre would pump out about 415HP...

HELLO ML, CLK and SLK AMGs!!!
Old 01-30-2004, 09:34 AM
  #5  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
mkoesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: New V8 Motor

Originally posted by Ru55e11
I heard that the new V8 for the 500 cars was going to have 325HP and is reduced in capacity to 4.7 Litres.

This means that a naturally aspirated 5.4 Litre would pump out about 415HP...

HELLO ML, CLK and SLK AMGs!!!
Thanks for the bit of info. I presume this will be a DOHC 4V motor as GDawgC220 suggested.

I have also heard from a few different sources that the AMG V8 will be increased from 5.4L to 6.3L. I presume this motor will get DOHC heads as well (eventually, if not immediately). This would probably allow for about 450hp naturally aspirated.

So this would leave us with:

DOHC 3.5L V6 275hp
DOHC 4.7L V8 325hp
DOHC 6.3L V8 400-450hp

The 3.5L V6 can effectively replace the 4.3L V8, and the 4.7L V8 replaced the 5L V8, and the 6.3L V8 replaces the 5.4L V8.

This still leaves one burning question: what happens to the 3.7L V6 in the current S350 (not sold in US) and ML350? Its fairly new, so its hard to imagine it going away, but at the same time it seems redundant now.
Old 01-30-2004, 09:37 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GDawgC220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,781
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
'05 A4 1.8TQM6
Re: Re: New V8 Motor

Originally posted by mkoesel
Thanks for the bit of info. I presume this will be a DOHC 4V motor as GDawgC220 suggested.

I have also heard from a few different sources that the AMG V8 will be increased from 5.4L to 6.3L. I presume this motor will get DOHC heads as well (eventually, if not immediately). This would probably allow for about 450hp naturally aspirated.

So this would leave us with:

DOHC 3.5L V6 275hp
DOHC 4.7L V8 325hp
DOHC 6.3L V8 400-450hp

The 3.5L V6 can effectively replace the 4.3L V8, and the 4.7L V8 replaced the 5L V8, and the 6.3L V8 replaces the 5.4L V8.

This still leaves one burning question: what happens to the 3.7L V6 in the current S350 (not sold in US) and ML350? Its fairly new, so its hard to imagine it going away, but at the same time it seems redundant now.
Yes, the new engines are going to be DOHC, 4 Valves / Cyl, etc. I am assuming that the current engines in the 350's with the 3.7 litres are going to stay around for a little bit then slowly get converted over?

I read that the N/A 6.3L from AMG would pump out over 500HP's
Old 01-30-2004, 02:30 PM
  #7  
Newbie
 
Ru55e11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Datchet UK
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK320
MB Engines in general

Sure there will be a 6.3 Litre V8 NA with more than 600HP, but less torque than the TTV12s. AMG is dropping the supercharger route in favour of big bore V8s. I also heard that AMG will be delivering 2 V8s and a V12.

V8 - 5.4 or 5.3 Litre 4 valves etc with about 400 - 420 HP
V8 - 6.3 Litre as above

V12 - 6.05 Litre (dont know about induction but judging from the improvements in the above V8's prob NA) with close to 700 HP.

Torque numbers are harder to come by at this stage.

There will be numerous other engine replacements, but most notably for S and CL Class V12 drivers there seems to be a 'bit of a do' about whether or not to even make an S/CL600 in the new model range.
Old 01-30-2004, 02:44 PM
  #8  
Newbie
 
Ru55e11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Datchet UK
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK320
V6 245hp 3.7 Litre Engine is a 'stop gap'

mkoesel, it seems that the 3.7 Litre engine in the current S, SL and ML is actually just the same engine block as the 5 Litre current V8 with 2 of the cylinders just removed, and a new crank to counter the difference in balance. There have been reports that it feels a bit 'lumpy'. My feeling is that is why it has only managed to find it's way into some of the heavier cars.

The HP and torque numbers are very close if you take into acount the difference in cylinders.

Interestingly, as part of an earlier argument, MB always underquotes their engines output power and acceleration times. I think really to be sure that they are correct for the worst case situations (very hot climates with poorer quality fuel) so they just quote those figures.
Old 01-30-2004, 07:46 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 3,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 E55 AMG
I think the 3.7L V-6 is just a temporary engine.
Old 01-31-2004, 06:29 AM
  #10  
Super Member
 
S55inPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wilkes Barre Pa.
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fiscal Neo Con Express
hey guys,

doesn't it amaze you how quickly MB will manufacture brand new engines. when you look at GM, Ford, Toyota, Lexus, etc. you just don't see that kind of progressive approach to engine building. most other manufacturers stay with the same engine for years and years if not decades. i was always confused by this. because if MB can engineer new engines and do it relatively often why don't other manufacturers? ie....look at Lexus. toyota is swimming in money but they don't have anything bigger than a 4.3 litre motor to offer their customers. this is just another reason why MB is king of the hill.
Old 01-31-2004, 09:35 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GDawgC220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,781
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
'05 A4 1.8TQM6
Originally posted by S55inPA
hey guys,

doesn't it amaze you how quickly MB will manufacture brand new engines. when you look at GM, Ford, Toyota, Lexus, etc. you just don't see that kind of progressive approach to engine building. most other manufacturers stay with the same engine for years and years if not decades. i was always confused by this. because if MB can engineer new engines and do it relatively often why don't other manufacturers? ie....look at Lexus. toyota is swimming in money but they don't have anything bigger than a 4.3 litre motor to offer their customers. this is just another reason why MB is king of the hill.
yup. and the thing is, it doesn't seem like MB fails at engine quality control either...it's more interior is where their downfall is, but their engines seem to hold up very well in most cases.
Old 02-02-2004, 09:54 AM
  #12  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
mkoesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: MB Engines in general

Originally posted by Ru55e11
V12 - 6.05 Litre (dont know about induction but judging from the improvements in the above V8's prob NA) with close to 700 HP.
Thanks for all of your comments. I just wanted to add to the above statement, by pointing out these pages:

http://www.mercedes-benz.com/omb/amg...cl65/index.htm
http://www.mercedes-benz.com/omb/amg.../s65/index.htm

So as you can see a 6L TT V12 is already in production. 612hp and 1000nm (737ft-lb) torque. I'm not sure if a N/A 6L V12 will also follow, but it will be interesting to see.
Old 02-03-2004, 08:55 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 3,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 E55 AMG
The first time I saw the 65's guages, I said, 7000RPM redline! Impossible for a huge turbocharged engine! Neat page.
Old 02-25-2004, 10:43 AM
  #14  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
mkoesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At last some info from the press (which by no means makes it 100%, but it sounds reasonable):

from http://www.autoweek.com/cat_content...._code=00689032
CLS will be available in the United States in early 2005, with the company's new 24-valve 272-hp 3.5-liter V6 in the CLS350, and the familiar three-valve-per-cylinder 24-valve 306-hp 5.0-liter V8 in the CLS500. About 18 months after CLS goes on sale, two new 32-valve V8 engines will join the lineup: a 350-hp 4.6-liter and a 400-hp 5.5-liter. When they arrive, the existing 5.0-liter V8 will be phased out of production. But before the new V8 engines arrive, Mercedes plans to launch a CLS55 AMG model. Due to premier at the Paris motor show in September, it gets the supercharged 500-hp 5.5-liter V8 engine used in a variety of AMG models.

Need more? In preparation for the new AMG-developed 6.3-liter V8 engine in 2006, Mercedes also has registered the CLS63 name, which AutoWeek sources say will replace the CLS55.
So it looks like the new Mercedes corporate engines will be

DOHC 3.5L V6 272hp
DOHC 4.6L V8 350hp
DOHC 5.5L V8 400hp
DOHC 6.3L V8 500+hp? (AMG)

My guess is that, although it makes almost as much power and torque as the outoing 4.3L V8, the 3.5L V6 will not be available in the S class in the US. The 4.6L will probably be the base option.

The last question remaining is what other V6 displacements will show up below the 3.5L. Not that those would show up in the S-class, but still their size remains a curiousity nonetheless.

Last edited by mkoesel; 02-25-2004 at 10:47 AM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 4.3L V8 vs. new 3.5L V6



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:22 AM.