2003 Twin-Turbo S600 will have 500+ HP!
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Also, I believe, the S55 is w220 with the suppose "faster" shifting times, not the S600. Regardless, the tiptronic, as it stands today, is only useful for downshifting and for lane passing.
Flooring your benz will almost always yield the best straight line 0-60 and quarter mile times.
As for the tip, you are right, just put it to the floor and go. As for shifting its not bad, it will hold gears for ya around turns and downshift on high speed stops. etc.
So if you look at the S63 AMG, being about 100hp more than the S55, the S63 was 3/10 faster, and I am also reading the there is lag in the twin turo in the SL55. Maybe a trade in is not worth it.
Baron
I really have no idea what the new S600 will have. It would make sense that the new S600 will have more HP than the S55 supercharged, if you follow the usual Mercedes train-of-thought. However, twin turbocharged? When was the last time DaimlerChrysler put a twin turbo on a car, much less the flagship sedan?
Regardless, i'm surprised Mercedes will do any major engine revision on the hugely successful S class. Only time will tell.
the current C32 and SLK32 has something called SpeedShift.
Anyways, the new SL55 has SpeedShift, but it is on the steering wheel.
Note, on the Mercedes Benz site, the current W220 S55 does not have Speedshift.




at 550hp,
2003 s600 is supposed to be slightly detuned though,according to my sources high 400hp.
As for Turbo or Supercharge you make a good point. Why not support just one for all. It seems AMG went one why while main MB went another.
So now to debate on SC or TT, and a theory.
I beleive that when it comes to low end power, the SC will perform better (AMG's thoughts), more predictable. While in the top end TT will produce more hp but have more lag in low end (twin still has lag). Thus the 600 being tt to move the beast. The 600 being a more flagship ride while the 55 being more athletic.
This maybe their reason.
thoughts?



