BMW ALPINA B7 vs. Mercedes S63 AMG
Interesting read. No surprise on the outcome though.
that they "still lack that certain oomph that BMW and Audi have honed so perfectly."

Yep the S65/600, (S63) CLK 63 Blk Series, SL 65/600/E63... every AMG in fact, is not "up there" as a serious performance vehicle at all.. nope... everyone knows they all lack that "certain oomph..."

Chris
Last edited by cjf_moraga; Feb 27, 2008 at 11:21 AM.

Yep the S65, (S63) CLK 63 Blk Series, E63... every AMG in fact, is not up there as a serious performance vehicle at all.. nope...

Chris
Agreed!! You should also read their review of the C63 vs M3. Its also flawed with the same arguments.
Can't forget they don't hand out journalist jobs to just anyone....

Would observe which cars are repeatedly chosen by guys who can afford any car (and who are actually interested in driving)....in my expce, lots of new AMGs and MBs...not many Ferraris/Porsches (even for wkend driving)...and far fewer BMW/Audi/Lexus....

But need to drive any car >300-500mis or so on interesting roads to draw own conclusions....these are all discretionary cars....value is determined by subjective driving pleasure provided....
The plethora of breathless glowing M5 reviews, despite its miserable range, awkward SMG, and over complexity, are the worst recent offender IMO... It's still a fascinating car but the "BMW can do no wrong" school of journalism is getting tiresome...
Alas, good objective/analytic journalists are rarer than hens teeth...
Chris
Looks like the author is biased big time. WHO in their right mind would pick an aging BMW 7 sedan over a state of the art MB S63?

"askmen.com"? Give me a break!
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Looks like the author is biased big time. WHO in their right mind would pick an aging BMW 7 sedan over a state of the art MB S63?

"askmen.com"? Give me a break!
As regards B7 vs S63, I'd take the 63.
Just read the first graph of the review. What an idiot. Alpina is to BM what AMG is to Merc...ummm, MOTORSPORT? Clearly hasn't heard of Brabus.
A worthless read.
Last edited by Carl Lassiter; Feb 27, 2008 at 05:17 PM.
Like how he says the Merc will hit 186mph de-ristricted when that is just the 030 limited speed. 190-195 would be a closer figure but then again I'm not just rehashing a press release fact sheet like this fool.
The driving experience is by nature subjective. We can objectively measure things like acceleration and cornering ability and traction but how do you measure how refined a vehicle is, or how 'sporty' a car is? Thats the problem and Mercedes tends to get the short end of the stick especially when the vehicles getting reviewed are sport-luxury vehicles. BMW is known for producing vehicles for the sports car enthusiast so the comparable mercedes will get labeled a 'compromise' simply because the vehicle has a nicer or more refined interior. Its the eternal argument of brand x v.s brand y and it will never end.
Now as far as Mercedes goes I will say this: BMW tends to make cars that are more 'sporty' designs from the outset but one of the tradeoffs is that the BMW interior tends to feel a bit "rough" in some ways, at least to me. Mercedes on the other hand is just a very comfortable and refined car. I have never felt as "at home" as in my S class. AMG however is another story: with AMG they take this extremely refined and comfortable vehicle and then make it insanely fast to boot. I have had a chance to drive the Z8 alpina and the SL65 and while both cars are fast the SL65 is just a monster... oh and you can actually fit in it too.






