Interesting take on the 222/221
Literally we're moving towards a point where the car drives you and that may not necessarily be good news for guys who actually enjoy driving.
http://m.caranddriver.com/columns/th...-decade-column


Literally we're moving towards a point where the car drives you and that may not necessarily be good news for guys who actually enjoy driving.
http://m.caranddriver.com/columns/th...-decade-column
It wasn't until the W210 and W220 that the different models started having their own unique appearance.
That being said, I fully agree with the points made in the article.
It was only around late-90's to late-00's that different models had different identities, possibly because the designers let their creativity ran free having the ability to use the new fancy steel-pressing techniques.
It was only around late-90's to late-00's that different models had different identities, possibly because the designers let their creativity ran free having the ability to use the new fancy steel-pressing techniques.
In the 1990's a good friend of mine had a 300SEL 6.3. Looking at that car, no one would have guessed what it was capable of. Ugh... now I'm depressed
Trending Topics


The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The S500 is nice, but it feels really fragile.
I wish luxury carmakers would go back to making comfortable tanks rather than filling cars with ludicrously stupid overcomplicated gizmos to achieve simple goals.







I never felt safe in my 126, that's for sure!
People are out of their minds.



Keep in mind that is a Billion dollars in the 1980's.
No car company will ever put that much time, money, research, engineering or quality into another car again.
I never felt safe in my 126, that's for sure!
People are out of their minds.
I believe the 140 was unibody from the rear up to the A-pillar, but a massively heavy cast iron subframe as used for the engine cradle and front suspension mounts.



