2014 S-class
No premium 1, no enhancements to the back seat, no driver assistance. So, even with 12K+ in options this car is going to be one of the most bare bones S class on the market.
Bare in your view. Everyone has what options they desire the most, and though I would love to have every option in the book, I don't want to pay $130K either.... I have 10K for options, and while most would use it for the "tech", I'd prefer to use it on looks.
Having driven plenty of M-B's with the laggard 7G, including a TTV8 with one, it is simply archaic and I'm certain will be a big drawback on an otherwise new S Class with lots of new tech features. Once the 2015's come out you'll likely have buyers claiming "I'm glad I waited because the difference is 'night and day'"). At the same time, Merc never got the 7G right so who's to say the 9G will be all that great, however regardless, it will have two extra gears and that has to go towards something.
.... On another point, the 7G was extremely problematic in its first several years, so if the 9G follows suit in that way, and you have early adopters reporting buggy operation, then maybe the last adopters of the 7G may have the last laugh.
For the W222 interior to impress like it does to many here via the press-pics, it seems like it's gonna need a good chunk of extra $$$$ thrown at it.
Last edited by K-A; Aug 13, 2013 at 06:44 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
However, indeed, M-B does allow you to "dress it up" much higher than any S Class before it, much more so than you could the W221, so in that aspect yes the potential for it does take the S to new grounds, but the fundamental basis doesn't, aside from simply being a new model evolution, IMO.
However, indeed, M-B does allow you to "dress it up" much higher than any S Class before it, much more so than you could the W221, so in that aspect yes the potential for it does take the S to new grounds, but the fundamental basis doesn't, aside from simply being a new model evolution, IMO.
Having gone through the order guide. The Cnet car has Nappa leather in it. The premium Nappa gives you the quilted seats, quilted dash, better headliner and more wood. More wood being a requisite for premium nappa. Deseigno just takes the texture of the leather to a higher grade.
The cnet car has a rather boring black, black, black wood interior. At the same point, a two tone black brown would make the same interior stand out more.
Having gone through the order guide. The Cnet car has Nappa leather in it. The premium Nappa gives you the quilted seats, quilted dash, better headliner and more wood. More wood being a requisite for premium nappa. Deseigno just takes the texture of the leather to a higher grade.
The cnet car has a rather boring black, black, black wood interior. At the same point, a two tone black brown would make the same interior stand out more.
Yes, of course it's still very nice looking and certainly will be all kinds of comfortable, but I think lots of people haven't really noticed basic-spec W222 interiors through the plethora of highly digitized, airbrushed and extremely well-equipped W222 setups, based on comments about its potential comparison to more highly priced "exotic" Luxury cars.
Yes, of course it's still very nice looking and certainly will be all kinds of comfortable, but I think lots of people haven't really noticed basic-spec W222 interiors through the plethora of highly digitized, airbrushed and extremely well-equipped W222 setups, based on comments about its potential comparison to more highly priced "exotic" Luxury cars.
Was this car a consideration that you have decided not to order based upon all your various opinions regarding it?
Was this car a consideration that you have decided not to order based upon all your various opinions regarding it?
My point is that video with one of the rare glimpses of an un-airbrushed, un-marketing promo, un-highly-optioned W222 interior shows that it simply is not. Not that it should be any surprise considering it costs over 3 times less, but the questions and comparisons have been made time and time again, and one needs to go no further than an example of a basic-spec (which will dominate the W222 orders on dealer lots, no doubt) W222 to realize the answer.
Maybe I posted that impression from the video in the wrong thread as now that I started searching around I realize the discussion/debate was going on in the Quattroporte thread. A quick glimpse there and you'll see what this is about.
Was this car a consideration that you have decided not to order due to what you perceive are it's various design, quality and engineering shortcomings that you cite?
Is this car a consideration that you have decided you're struggling with going through due to my perceptions about its various design, quality and engineering shortcomings?
Is this car a consideration that you have decided you're struggling with going through due to my perceptions about its various design, quality and engineering shortcomings?
I have personally never been swayed by a car forum regarding purchasing decisions. I fail to receive any useful information from the what people perceive an interior is like based upon what they see on the web.
Now your turn to answer my question:




I have personally never been swayed by a car forum regarding purchasing decisions. I fail to receive any useful information from the what people perceive an interior is like based upon what they see on the web.
Now your turn to answer my question:
Give this man a inline six with an 8 speed ZF tranny and spring suspension and he is good to go
As for your last line, yes indeed.

But any car is on my radar to buy, be in within a chosen spending budget. If not today, then tomorrow. An S Class after a year or two (by the time it gets the 9G) with a starting price of $105-ishK will doubtlessly start to get M-B's now characteristic 15-20+% price slashing's (SL already gets it, CLS already gets it, E Class has been getting it for some time) which puts it in a pretty attainable range for someone who'e looking for something just under the triple digit range.
Last edited by K-A; Aug 15, 2013 at 12:05 AM.
The interior simply doesn't have that overblown-luxury vibe that is designed to attack all senses like that of a Ghost or the like, namely in basic spec trim. It doesn't have that "exclusive craftsmanship" vibe. It's great for its sector, no doubt, but I think people got way ahead of themselves in thinking it can compete with a Ghost, or Bentley.
KA: You still don't answer my question clearly like I did yours
All you state that is you would be happy with a bargain with an S down the road. That is if you don't talk your self out using the facelift as an excuse or the upcoming 7 series.
Again:
Was this car a consideration that you have decided not to order due to what you perceive are it's various design, quality and engineering shortcomings that you cite?

For the record I don't recall criticizing quality shortcomings or engineering shortcomings if you take out of account personal preferences perhaps. I still don't see what that has to do with the discussion about the W222 interior and how far or close it may be to a Rolls Ghost or Bentley Continentals interior.
Having had multiple MB's at launch there is valid info that pops up as the excitement builds. Often there are questions about things that are misunderstood about packages. New reviews that pop up, videos, pics.
This is why I returned to this forum after about 2 years since the last CLS came out. If I remember you were out in the E class forum at that time complaining about the new E that you then ended up getting. Most of your points were pretty much the same regarding design.
Anyhow it is sad to see that this entire forum has been take over by two topics:
1. comparing the interior of the W222 to cars that are in a higher segment. I am sure people in the equus (if that is how it is spelled) forum compare that car to the W222 and how it's interior is supposedly better and so on. All pointless stuff. People who can afford an S don't buy a Hyundai as much as people who can afford a Rolls don't buy an S or a 7.
2. The lack of a 9speed gearbox. A more valid argument.
The horse is so dead that it is being served on the dollar menu down the road for $.99 as a cheese burger.
The interior simply doesn't have that overblown-luxury vibe that is designed to attack all senses like that of a Ghost or the like, namely in basic spec trim. It doesn't have that "exclusive craftsmanship" vibe. It's great for its sector, no doubt, but I think people got way ahead of themselves in thinking it can compete with a Ghost, or Bentley.
So in other words nothing. The S550 used was all Black inside right? A Ghost would look the same way. Do you think there is MB Tex is a U.S. market S-Class? Really, think about that. Design? The Bentley's are far from anything dramatic. The Rolls has that old-school design which works, but Bentley? There is nothing unique about the FS or CGT design.
So far you haven't given anything specific, only saying "look at it". The press has clearly stated that this S-Class can compete with Bentley and Rolls in the interior department. They've been in the car, you haven't. Until I get to see it for myself I think I'll go with that.
That said, compete with isn't the same thing as being = to or better. Keep that in mind.
The thing that you and others fall for for Bentley and Rolls is the stuffed seats and the size of their seats, makes a big difference vs regular cars and it adds to the perception of a Rolls or Bentley being this overbuild machine. Unless you're talking about a Phantom, Wraith or Mulsanne the S-Class is at the very least in the same universe as the Ghost or CGT or Flying Spur IMO and more than one reviewer has said this so far.
To think we're only talking about the S550 so far, not the eventual S600 and S65 AMG models.
M
Last edited by Germancar1; Aug 15, 2013 at 11:11 AM.



