W222 a "heavily facelifted" W221? Rides on same core chassis/architecture
And yes, that is very lame I can imagine. As a RR owner you pay for the exclusiveness, which kinda disappears with those kind of things, sadly. Not that I'd ever own one myself but I can definitely imagine it being annoying for those who do.
Now, the Ghost being based on the 7er actually means it uses the same platform as the F10? Wow. That is incredible. I guess tweaking the platform heavily really hides it well. Another reason the W222 can compete with/be better than the Ghost, as it's not basically a pumped up E-Class.





And yes, that is very lame I can imagine. As a RR owner you pay for the exclusiveness, which kinda disappears with those kind of things, sadly. Not that I'd ever own one myself but I can definitely imagine it being annoying for those who do.
Now, the Ghost being based on the 7er actually means it uses the same platform as the F10? Wow. That is incredible. I guess tweaking the platform heavily really hides it well. Another reason the W222 can compete with/be better than the Ghost, as it's not basically a pumped up E-Class.





So, the RR has a lot to do with the 7 series (most parts from the whole car), yet almost nothing with the 5 series
W222
http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars...s-benz-s-class
Compare with w221 here
http://www.germancarforum.com/commun...l.36083/page-4
200kg weight reduction and 50% more stiffness, plus the need to support more models (coupe, cabrio, Pullman etc) all suggest new rather than old chassis+facelift.
I sat in an a facelifted E Class yesterday. Honest to goodness, it felt 10 years behind the 5 Series, at least. 5 Series is also far more solid and rigid than the E Class verified not by fanboy-figures but by actual statistics (and isn't consisting of half Chinese parts, doesn't have an interior with plastics fit for an $18K car, rides smoother, quieter, handles vastly better, far superior powertrain, far superior tech, doesn't make you look or feel fit for a retirement home, and so on and so on....).
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Maybe I'm just a more relentless debater than most....




I'm continually dumbfounded as to why you waste hours of your time posting your useless and repetitive drivel on a site where your input is obviously not wanted.
I've had plenty of M-B's and have plenty of M-B knowledge, I don't need one currently to have a "card" to speak about them. Nowhere in this forum does it state "Must Currently Love and/or Have Mercedes".
Funny how you whine about stuff like this to me but not to those such as the guy who pulls an old and dead thread out of its coffin to reignite this "debate" by sidetracking it as EVERYONE does to an E Class VS 5 Series argument simply because I'm a participant. Then you get upset when I rebut with why the the BMW is currently so vastly superior to me. I was essentially asked (or "baited").
Last edited by K-A; Sep 17, 2013 at 09:01 PM.
Every review between the F10 535i wins against the E350. The 535i just beat the E400 which is set to replace the E550 in a test comparison, which should give further perspective as the E400 is a more expensive model. You couldn't be further from the truth my friend.
.




That said, I'd trust the opinion of a sales manager over the opinion of a constantly trolling fanboy.
Given BMW's history with HPFPs and electrical issues (the first 3 years of production in particular), and you couldn't pay me to drive one. After being stuck in a pig of a 2011 328i xDrive for a month in January while my car was in the body shop and dealing with its inability to gt out of its own way or deliver 16+ MPG, my personal opinion is that their engineering is vastly inferior to MB.




I'm still a welcome member of those forums. I don't have people commenting when I come back from a 2 week hiatus that I should take another.
Last edited by interiormagic; Sep 18, 2013 at 10:15 AM.
That said, I'd trust the opinion of a sales manager over the opinion of a constantly trolling fanboy.
Given BMW's history with HPFPs and electrical issues (the first 3 years of production in particular), and you couldn't pay me to drive one. After being stuck in a pig of a 2011 328i xDrive for a month in January while my car was in the body shop and dealing with its inability to gt out of its own way or deliver 16+ MPG, my personal opinion is that their engineering is vastly inferior to MB.
ALL my previous Benzes had WAY more issues than my BMW has already had in the first year of drivership. My W212's both turned into rattle traps by that time, with increasingly harsh suspensions, factory defects I had to have replaced, fit/finish issues, and warranty work on my 2010 E, with one open case of an injector squeaky sound they could never fix. Yes, M-B's of the 80's and early 90's were built like tanks, not so much in my experience since then.I'm still a welcome member of those forums. I don't have people commenting when I come back from a 2 week hiatus that I should take another.
This is precisely the clientele that has helped earn M-B a declining reputation in recent years.
I sat in an a facelifted E Class yesterday. Honest to goodness, it felt 10 years behind the 5 Series, at least. 5 Series is also far more solid and rigid than the E Class verified not by fanboy-figures but by actual statistics (and isn't consisting of half Chinese parts, doesn't have an interior with plastics fit for an $18K car, rides smoother, quieter, handles vastly better, far superior powertrain, far superior tech, doesn't make you look or feel fit for a retirement home, and so on and so on....).
Now what figures do you have to prove that 5-Series is more rigid than the E-Class?
M
Every review between the F10 535i wins against the E350. The 535i just beat the E400 which is set to replace the E550 in a test comparison, which should give further perspective as the E400 is a more expensive model. You couldn't be further from the truth my friend.
Where is this comparison? I'm sure you have a link to it right?
M



