S63/65 “OVERPRODUCED” says Automobile Magazine
http://www.automobilemag.com/news/20...93ACB7B2543A62
Realistically, these are standard cars that have a hand built engine and an uprated (not upgraded) suspension system.
It is sort of like Ferrari. With a Ferrari, you buy the engine, and they trow in the rest of the car for free.
http://www.automobilemag.com/news/20...93ACB7B2543A62
M
Last edited by Streamliner; Oct 19, 2017 at 08:29 AM.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
M
Last edited by Germancar1; Oct 20, 2017 at 12:02 AM.
I think there's a time and place for each model. If I was going to drive roads as he described (bad) and not be able to get the car past 55 the S63 and 65 are
handcuffed and "overproduced" for this scenario. Get out on the open highways and decent roads then nothing wrong with a little extra snort.
It still comes down to what works best for you. If the AMG's are out of the budget then it really doesn't matter and makes your choice much easier. For the guys that can afford and want the extra the AMG's offer then more power to them (pun intended) and hopefully they'll enjoy every moment.
Nice to see a glowing review of the S class.



M

Owning an M278 E550 7g-tronic and M157 E63 MTC I know what the writer is describing. Very similar cars, but the 550 is more than enough performance, and the 63 is in your face performance. As fun as it is blasting a 63 wagon around if I were to replace my E550 with an S it would be S560 (with extended nappa leather and warmth/comfort). It's a luxury car, and I'm sure when I ask it to perform it will.
As I wrote this I thought of a question would I rather have an E63 wagon and an S560, or an E400 wagon and an S63 - I'll take the former combo.
Last edited by MBNUT1; Oct 20, 2017 at 07:54 PM.










