Least satisfying cars...
I came to realize this when I traded my SWB LS460 in for a LWB LS460L, same car but the LWB car felt so much more satisfying...it gives the car an elegance over the road that only length and weight gives you.
I came to realize this when I traded my SWB LS460 in for a LWB LS460L, same car but the LWB car felt so much more satisfying...it gives the car an elegance over the road that only length and weight gives you.
However, regarding S-Class, I have different experience. The last generation of S-Class that I have extensively driven both SWB and LWB is the W126, where I found little to no difference. The SEL (a 380SEL), of course, had the additional 140mm (roughly 6'' to those not familiar with the SI units) legroom. But the SE (a 380SE) felt a little bit more precise and easier to maneuver (there was no rear axle steering back then). Since then, I have only driven LWB S-Class.
I remember a Canadian member @martinlarose here drives a SWB 223. He should chime in. I just do not see a big difference between W223 vs V223.
However, having said this, putting all S-Class good stuff into a W206 C-Class will be a totally difference story from comparing W223 vs V223 though. Here, I do reckon that the S-Class experience cannot be nearly replicated.
Interesting fact:-
LWB C-Class (V206) has 3.3'' longer wheelbase than W206.
LWB E-Class (V213) has 5.5'' longer wheelbase than W213.
LWB GLC-Class (GLC-L) has 4'' longer wheelbase than the regular X253.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The way I wished it worked is that cars of different sizes came in all flavors of luxury. With MB (as an example) you'd have a 300C, 300E, 300S, 500C, 500E, 500S, like that. The size remains the same, what changes is the level of equipment, tech, and materials. I find a smaller car very useful in town and I used to keep a town car for that purpose but it's never been the car I want it to be; that car would be smaller than the S Class but with all the luxuries of an S Class. It doesn't matter that the sizing would affect the way it rides because the purpose isn't to recreate the S Class in a smaller car, it's to get the advantages of smaller cars with the goodies you want.
I'm thinking about getting the electric Macan for beater duty when that comes out; partly because I feel like sampling an EV but mostly because Porsche lets you tart up the Macan to half decent levels.
However, regarding S-Class, I have different experience. The last generation of S-Class that I have extensively driven both SWB and LWB is the W126, where I found little to no difference. The SEL (a 380SEL), of course, had the additional 140mm (roughly 6'' to those not familiar with the SI units) legroom. But the SE (a 380SE) felt a little bit more precise and easier to maneuver (there was no rear axle steering back then). Since then, I have only driven LWB S-Class.
I remember a Canadian member @martinlarose here drives a SWB 223. He should chime in. I just do not see a big difference between W223 vs V223.
However, having said this, putting all S-Class good stuff into a W206 C-Class will be a totally difference story from comparing W223 vs V223 though. Here, I do reckon that the S-Class experience cannot be nearly replicated.
Interesting fact:-
LWB C-Class (V206) has 3.3'' longer wheelbase than W206.
LWB E-Class (V213) has 5.5'' longer wheelbase than W213.
LWB GLC-Class (GLC-L) has 4'' longer wheelbase than the regular X253.
The current C-Class (W206) has most dimensions larger than an E-Class W124 of the early 90's! So, this growth did not happen in recent years.
And guess what? The current E-Class (W213) has dimensions larger than a S-Class W126 (SWB) of the 80's.
The way I wished it worked is that cars of different sizes came in all flavors of luxury. With MB (as an example) you'd have a 300C, 300E, 300S, 500C, 500E, 500S, like that. The size remains the same, what changes is the level of equipment, tech, and materials. I find a smaller car very useful in town and I used to keep a town car for that purpose but it's never been the car I want it to be; that car would be smaller than the S Class but with all the luxuries of an S Class. It doesn't matter that the sizing would affect the way it rides because the purpose isn't to recreate the S Class in a smaller car, it's to get the advantages of smaller cars with the goodies you want.
I'm thinking about getting the electric Macan for beater duty when that comes out; partly because I feel like sampling an EV but mostly because Porsche lets you tart up the Macan to half decent levels.
For me I originally chose the SWB LS460 because I didn't want something that long, and something was always missing that I couldn't put my finger on. When I drove the LWB one a couple years later, I immediately recognized what the SWB one was missing and I traded it on one.
For me I originally chose the SWB LS460 because I didn't want something that long, and something was always missing that I couldn't put my finger on. When I drove the LWB one a couple years later, I immediately recognized what the SWB one was missing and I traded it on one.
Liking small cars is totally legitimate. I wouldn't say you are part of the minority, likely among S Class owners but not car drivers in general. If you like driving an S Class...you like driving a big car. They drive like a big car.
My wife much prefers driving small cars...she hates having to drive a big family car. Me, I would never buy anything under 195 inches long.
Last edited by SW20S; Mar 8, 2023 at 09:49 AM.
The Iridium silver coupe - while a stunning looking car - is small
BUT SHE LOVES IT!
Meanwhile I'm looking into curb rash solutions.
ez
Thanks for providing your research findings.
I came to realize this when I traded my SWB LS460 in for a LWB LS460L, same car but the LWB car felt so much more satisfying...it gives the car an elegance over the road that only length and weight gives you.
To go back to the question posed in regards to getting better goods in smaller cars; I agree with it, I'm 3 thumbs up. It just wasn't what I was looking for in this car. When I want a truck I buy a truck; in this case I wanted to sample a luxo-barge, never tried one. I'm more of a sports car type, but those are getting hard to climb in and out of anymore. There are rewards that go to driving dynamics as you get smaller and lighter. I really wish I could get all the goods in a smaller car for when I want that car.
Honestly, you achieve what you describe with a really highly spec'ed E Class with air suspension. Thats about as close to an S Class as is possible in a smaller size.
As an example, the GLE vs the GLS. When you drive the two, they are basically the same vehicle in two lengths if you option the GLE with air suspension, the GLS rides considerably better...more weight and the longer wheelbase.
Last edited by MBNUT1; Mar 8, 2023 at 04:13 PM.
To go back to the A45 that car was a hoot to drive, I really liked that part. I like a small crossover in town and I'm not looking for ultimate comfort in that use. I would however like to have all the comforts and the quality of build that only now comes on full sized stuff right now. It didn't have that; if it did I would have legitimately considered buying it.












