More of a beta tester than an S580 owner.
Last edited by ArcticSilver; Jul 25, 2024 at 11:40 AM. Reason: typos
Good sense of humour, truly sorry you have to go through all of this, can't believe you can still be remain so calm, I would had lost my cool way a while ago.
Last edited by W205C43PFL; Jul 25, 2024 at 12:35 PM.




The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I got the car back. The dealer managed to put Humpty Dumpty back together again, and for now, the car is running well.
While the car was in for service (31 days this time), I started the buy-back request process, which MBUSA has denied, stating that their review indicates my vehicle doesn’t qualify for a buy-back or relief under Nevada law statutes. They did, however, offer a "goodwill gesture" of two months of car payments.
I responded that while I’m not outright rejecting their offer, I don’t feel it adequately addresses the larger issues I’ve experienced with this car, especially considering my history with the brand, having purchased more than a dozen vehicles over the past 30 years. I received another call from MBUSA a week later in which they repeated their stance: no buy-back, but they stand by the two-month payment offer.
I’ve handed the situation over to my attorney and am waiting for his take on the matter. What strikes me as interesting is that the two-month payment offer was made immediately, without any meaningful discussion with me to learn about the car’s issues, my history with the brand, or hearing me out as a consumer. Despite my detailed appeal, MBUSA dismissed it and stuck to their original offer. They said that my dissatisfaction with the car and their decision "have been noted." Lovely.
To me, their quick response and gesture might suggest they sense some liability and are trying to resolve the issue cheaply. If they truly believed they had no risk, would they have made that offer right away?
I got the car back. The dealer managed to put Humpty Dumpty back together again, and for now, the car is running well.
While the car was in for service (31 days this time)
[snip]
They did, however, offer a "goodwill gesture" of two months of car payments.
[snip] [snip]
To me, their quick response and gesture might suggest they sense some liability and are trying to resolve the issue cheaply. If they truly believed they had no risk, would they have made that offer right away?
Seems.... reasonable?
Of course in attorney-land logic and common sense are replaced by outrage on the off chance it works
That said, I am not sure what MB you had been working on (I am all for hearing success stories of DIYing), the W223 is the most technologically advanced version of their car so the complexity and the chances of something going wrong is high when they do major surgeries like these. It also depends on who was doing the work. In the past, technicians are passionate about cars and take pride of their work, now they are here for the pay cheque. Not saying everyone is like that though.
For what it is worth, the highly trained technicians from personal experience and my friend's experience are not what they seem but again this depends on the dealership. I had many encounters of repairs not done right and/or messing up something else in the process.
Seems.... reasonable?
Of course in attorney-land logic and common sense are replaced by outrage on the off chance it works
Accepting the offer doesn’t preclude him from demanding a buyback if he has further issues.
That said, I am not sure what MB you had been working on (I am all for hearing success stories of DIYing), the W223 is the most technologically advanced version of their car so the complexity and the chances of something going wrong is high when they do major surgeries like these. It also depends on who was doing the work. In the past, technicians are passionate about cars and take pride of their work, now they are here for the pay cheque. Not saying everyone is like that though.
For what it is worth, the highly trained technicians from personal experience and my friend's experience are not what they seem but again this depends on the dealership. I had many encounters of repairs not done right and/or messing up something else in the process.
The complexity you're describing is mostly software/electrical. The whole point of asinine touchscreens and displays is the reduction of physical complexity...
Of course that doesn't translate to the engines, where the european carmakers have gone off the rails in terms of complexity.
The complexity you're describing is mostly software/electrical. The whole point of asinine touchscreens and displays is the reduction of physical complexity...
Of course that doesn't translate to the engines, where the european carmakers have gone off the rails in terms of complexity.
As for the putting things back together I was just stating my experience and my friend's experience. Dealerships (well not all of course, luck of the draw I guess but so far 3 here in Canada) can't put a dashboard back on properly, this that OP went through was basically that but on steroids.
I agree MBs are not that hard to work with in general, my indie prefers working on MB than BMW.
Last edited by W205C43PFL; Aug 14, 2024 at 11:12 AM.








I got the car back. The dealer managed to put Humpty Dumpty back together again, and for now, the car is running well.
While the car was in for service (31 days this time), I started the buy-back request process, which MBUSA has denied, stating that their review indicates my vehicle doesn’t qualify for a buy-back or relief under Nevada law statutes. They did, however, offer a "goodwill gesture" of two months of car payments.
I responded that while I’m not outright rejecting their offer, I don’t feel it adequately addresses the larger issues I’ve experienced with this car, especially considering my history with the brand, having purchased more than a dozen vehicles over the past 30 years. I received another call from MBUSA a week later in which they repeated their stance: no buy-back, but they stand by the two-month payment offer.
I’ve handed the situation over to my attorney and am waiting for his take on the matter. What strikes me as interesting is that the two-month payment offer was made immediately, without any meaningful discussion with me to learn about the car’s issues, my history with the brand, or hearing me out as a consumer. Despite my detailed appeal, MBUSA dismissed it and stuck to their original offer. They said that my dissatisfaction with the car and their decision "have been noted." Lovely.
To me, their quick response and gesture might suggest they sense some liability and are trying to resolve the issue cheaply. If they truly believed they had no risk, would they have made that offer right away?
I got the car back. The dealer managed to put Humpty Dumpty back together again, and for now, the car is running well.
While the car was in for service (31 days this time), I started the buy-back request process, which MBUSA has denied, stating that their review indicates my vehicle doesn’t qualify for a buy-back or relief under Nevada law statutes. They did, however, offer a "goodwill gesture" of two months of car payments.
I responded that while I’m not outright rejecting their offer, I don’t feel it adequately addresses the larger issues I’ve experienced with this car, especially considering my history with the brand, having purchased more than a dozen vehicles over the past 30 years. I received another call from MBUSA a week later in which they repeated their stance: no buy-back, but they stand by the two-month payment offer.
I’ve handed the situation over to my attorney and am waiting for his take on the matter. What strikes me as interesting is that the two-month payment offer was made immediately, without any meaningful discussion with me to learn about the car’s issues, my history with the brand, or hearing me out as a consumer. Despite my detailed appeal, MBUSA dismissed it and stuck to their original offer. They said that my dissatisfaction with the car and their decision "have been noted." Lovely.
To me, their quick response and gesture might suggest they sense some liability and are trying to resolve the issue cheaply. If they truly believed they had no risk, would they have made that offer right away?
Notice any changes or imperfections?
Since getting it back, I am again getting numerous sensor failure messages (lane change assist, active brake assist, etc etc) indicating all sorts of impending disasters (kidding), and now the rear interior lights don't work again. It's been there 2x for that previously.
In the end though....I want this to end. I'm certain that they'll ask for language that limits my further options and remedies. I sure would if I was them. I'll use the 2-months of cash toward an extended warranty and they can just enjoy the steady stream of warranty claims this car will give them. We shall see.
Thank you.
Last edited by ArcticSilver; Aug 14, 2024 at 01:19 PM.
Since getting it back, I am again getting numerous sensor failure messages (lane change assist, active brake assist, etc etc) indicating all sorts of impending disasters (kidding), and now the rear interior lights don't work again. It's been there 2x for that previously.
In the end though....I want this to end. I'm certain that they'll ask for language that limits my further options and remedies. I sure would if I was them. I'll use the 2-months of cash toward an extended warranty and they can just enjoy the steady stream of warranty claims this car will give them. We shall see.
Thank you.
Since getting it back, I am again getting numerous sensor failure messages (lane change assist, active brake assist, etc etc) indicating all sorts of impending disasters (kidding), and now the rear interior lights don't work again. It's been there 2x for that previously.
In the end though....I want this to end. I'm certain that they'll ask for language that limits my further options and remedies. I sure would if I was them. I'll use the 2-months of cash toward an extended warranty and they can just enjoy the steady stream of warranty claims this car will give them. We shall see.
Thank you.










