Owning this thing to 100k miles…




See here...according to the thread with the poll ~50% of the LCI's MY 24+ have a weak ac issue.
More evidence of a very weak A/C (bimmerpost.com)
2023 X7 with Anemic Air Conditioning (bimmerpost.com)
Tested Two '25 X7's Today 40i/M60 (bimmerpost.com)
Last edited by RJC; Jul 26, 2024 at 07:50 PM.




More evidence of a very weak A/C (bimmerpost.com)
2023 X7 with Anemic Air Conditioning (bimmerpost.com)
Tested Two '25 X7's Today 40i/M60 (bimmerpost.com)
I would say that there are a lot of weird settings with BMW. Like being able to have heat coming out of the dash vents even when you're above the set temp and trying to cool the interior. It's possible if you set it up that way, and people will sometimes complain about it not working right when it's doing exactly what its been told in that scenario. It would be too much typing to describe it all, but the other BMW guys will know what I'm talking about. They've made it harder than it should be IMO.
On the other hand, the refresh was a bad joke, it did almost nothing to refresh the car, and I think most people couldn't find a difference without reference material. Meanwhile, MMI was never the greatest, is now quite dated, and riding on hardware that is far slower than the current expectation. The base car will get beaten about the head and shoulders by an X5, Even without considering value. Throw value in there and now you're looking at a loaded Q8 for close to 100k with far fewer features, much less performance, and a meaningly higher cost than a loaded X5. The S will get it's buttocks handed to it by the 60i, but in this case the pricing is close enough to set aside, but it's still behind on features. The RS will have sand kicked in its face and see its girl walk off with the X5M. It does have a more compliant ride than the M and might be a better choice for some.
I say this having driven most of the cars mentioned here quite recently.
Last edited by crabman; Jul 27, 2024 at 01:48 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
On the other hand, the refresh was a bad joke, it did almost nothing to refresh the car, and I think most people couldn't find a difference without reference material. Meanwhile, MMI was never the greatest, is now quite dated, and riding on hardware that is far slower than the current expectation. The base car will get beaten about the head and shoulders by an X5, Even without considering value. Throw value in there and now you're looking at a loaded Q8 for close to 100k with far fewer features, much less performance, and a meaningly higher cost than a loaded X5. The S will get it's buttocks handed to it by the 60i, but in this case the pricing is close enough to set aside, but it's still behind on features. The RS will have sand kicked in its face and see its girl walk off with the X5M. It does have a more compliant ride than the M and might be a better choice for some.
I say this having driven most of the cars mentioned here quite recently.
We almost traded the Q7 in for Q8 when they first came out but didn't care for the frameless windows on the Q8 as they made a racket rubbing on the weather stripping going over bumps etc. We also like the frames around the windows on the Q7 because people tend to close the doors by the windows and that makes us crazy.
We are in the market for a large full-sized SUV and are considering the X7, GLS, RR, (6 cyl or hybrid versions) as they will be for our CA place where prem fuel is not exactly inexpensive.
The SQ7 is quite nice but it appears for '25 they did not go MHEV/48V which would have helped with MPG's etc. and BMW/RR did. The GLS is a contender, but MB trans issues/rep has us concerned (rightfully so), we are to test one next week and see how it goes, as it would check most of the boxes. Question, I believe MB also went MHEV for the 580's - correct? BTW the BMW did for the X5's V8 etc. but not the M850's.
Last edited by RJC; Jul 28, 2024 at 10:24 PM.
I like Audi interiors, but they're getting old, feel old. MMI feels like yesterday in terms of layout, and it needs more pep, system responsiveness is behind what is expected now.
You've also got the driving feel, which can behind both MB and BMW; MB in ride quality, BMW in the sport department. Whichever way you want to go, you can do better.
Excellent packaging in the Q7/8, material quality is what you'd expect, and matches likely competitors.
The Q7/8 were great cars, and very competitive, an automotive lifetime ago. Now, everything is dated, and the refresh did nothing to change that. As refreshes go; I'm not sure if I've seen one as ineffectual. Maybe I have, but it doesn't come to mind. Really disappointing.
Going back up the thread, I wouldn't have compared the X5 and X7, different segments. Hard for me to make any meaningful comment on the 3 rows, I didn't look at them in depth. Offhand, I wouldn't think you'd suffer too much in any of those.
What if you do need to pull out the Amex for an engine? In the real world, back in the C6 days, I know a guy that lost an engine. He was out of warranty, and out of pocket for 5k. That was a better than new engine, in the car, total price. What's it going to cost for one of these V8s in this car now? Four times that? I just saw an AMG engine for over 50k. The game is a little different now, where you can have some truly eye-watering emergency expenses with a car out of warranty, that many will struggle to pay, or wont be able to pay at all. Remember the number running around where most people couldn't produce the cash to cover a 400 dollar emergency?
I'd guess that most of the people on this subsection could get themselves out of hot water if push came to shove with an out of warranty expense, even a major failure. But I wouldn't blame them if they'd rather just drop ching on some warranty coverage, if it came to owning out of warranty, because I think it's what I would do. I could buy that AMG engine, but I can tell you a real world tear would roll down my cheek.







