2006 S65
Thanks for the opinions.
If you're serious, tell them to look at auction prices and make them a offer.
http://www.enigmamotors.com/28
Cheers!
Last edited by gregwang; Jan 9, 2007 at 07:42 PM.




The W221 has lots of improvements over the W220 -- no argument. But for me, together they're not worth $80k. The two things that would improve the S65 experience markedly (a transmission that would reliably allow turning off the torque limiter and help with traction -- LSD and/or four-wheel drive) are not part of the package yet. Either one has the potential to crash the value of an '07 S65, by the way.
Forgo those improvement and a dealer becomes a captive subsidizer to the tune of $50k+. If it's the only way to get into the 65 experience, it's a no-brainer.
Trending Topics




The W221 has lots of improvements over the W220 -- no argument. But for me, together they're not worth $80k. The two things that would improve the S65 experience markedly (a transmission that would reliably allow turning off the torque limiter and help with traction -- LSD and/or four-wheel drive) are not part of the package yet. Either one has the potential to crash the value of an '07 S65, by the way.
Forgo those improvement and a dealer becomes a captive subsidizer to the tune of $50k+. If it's the only way to get into the 65 experience, it's a no-brainer.
But If someone pays for it, its not priced too high ... at least right now.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I don't see how unlimiting the torque would aid traction ? The reason the torque is limited in 1st gear is to aid traction
, I may have misunderstood you
.Reason the S65 drops like a stone in the uk is simple
People will generally pay
£30k-£40k tops for an Audi (A8 W12 lose a fortune)
£40-£50k for a BMW (760 is worth buttons in less than a year, Z8 was a disaster)
£50-£70k for a Merc (S600, S65 drop much, much faster than the lesser S models)
So a £145k S65 class looks more or less like a £50k S350, for a bit more you get a Bentley which has no cheaper model, everybody knows what it is.
I got my S65 near 1/2 price at about a year old only 10% more than an S55 , yet it cost near 150% when new
1) Torque is electronically limited to 738 ft-lb (1000 N-m) in all gears. It's not to aid traction. That's what ESP is for. The torque limit is because the transmission is only certified for 1000 N-m. The Renntech and Kleeman ECU/TCU upgrades remove this limiter along with the factory's designated margin of safety.
2) ESP is not a satisfactory traction solution. A real LSD or four-wheel-drive system would help with delivering the existing (or enhanced) power to the ground.
If AMG did any of these things, the resulting package would be more attractive than the current model, and would certainly depress their values. (1) would allow the factory to delivery another 100 HP with nothing more than a software change and (2) would improve the off-the-line performance dramatically.

However, having said that I personally think the 996 GT3 is a lot more fun to drive than the 996 turbo. That's the primary reason I bought the GT3, because it was RWD.
I don't know about the 997s. I haven't driven a 997 C4 or Turbo (yet.
)
The only other possiblities would be:
1) You can get an LSD on an S63 but not S65. That would be moronic.
2) The 030 option for S63 is a mistake, or doesn't include LSD. That would be a shame.
3) They add an extra-cost code 030 or LSD option to the S65. That would be insulting.
4) They make LSD a no-cost option for the S65. That would be overly complicated and would send a message that SL65 drivers can be "trusted" with an LSD but S65 can't, which is even more insulting.




