2003 s600 v12 twin turbo or 2003 s55 amg supercharged v8?
what do you think?




It's a simple case of whether you want your car to be a luxury or harder-edged sporting drive, whether you spend most of your time on freeways or like to master the twisties.
Two road tests here recently compared the S600 and S55 AMG and concluded - for a luxury sedan - the S600 was more appropriate. The S55 added character which was at odds with the nature and purpose of the car and almost compromised what the S is good at.
Another comparison I read on the CL600/CL55 preferred the '55. As for the SL, I do not expect to be trading mine for an SL600.
Bottom line is that it's great to have a choice of two engines across a range of three cars, there's no absolute right and wrong, it's just down to personal preference.
Last edited by blueSL; Dec 14, 2002 at 12:55 AM.

However, the Ferraris are much lighter...
You need more torque as the car gets heavier. But, yes for sports cars, on a track, high revving is usually better.
For real world, everyday driving, you can't beat having loads of torque. The 600 will be really fast and especially once you get to highway speeds. The enormous torque will just pull the car away.
The S55 also has a lot of torque... and both cars get their power at fairly low RPMs.
In any case, due to the extra power, a limited V12, and luxurious interior appointments that are not available on the 55, I would take the 600.
The only area I see the SL600 being frighteningly faster than an SL55 is the rate it will depreciate. The old 600s were not widely sold either and they still depreciated like a stone in free-fall.
Not sure what these luxurious appointments you're talking about are - ruffled leather? Very 80's. What else?
The AMG has stiffer suspension does it not? (I am not sure if that is true on an S.) The standard wheels and tires are different.
The AMG has the sportier transmission, the 600 will be smoother.
The AMG has sport seats, if you like that sort of thing.
The 600 has some very nice luxo interior features (more wood, etc) , and the AMG has some different ones.
The exhaust note will be different, as well.
It really depends if you want a sporty or a luxo S.
Like blueSL said, ain't it great that you have a choice!
The only area I see the SL600 being frighteningly faster than an SL55 is the rate it will depreciate. The old 600s were not widely sold either and they still depreciated like a stone in free-fall.
I agree!!
Last edited by theine; Dec 17, 2002 at 07:30 AM.
Trending Topics

Not sure what these luxurious appointments you're talking about are - ruffled leather? Very 80's. What else?
Also, I think if there were "old" SL55s, which also had comparable performance to the SL600s, they would have dropped in value too. New models do that to just about any car.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
So my question to you is whats the point? Give me an S55 and 65K for mods I could make it really cool but still wouldn't want one. On a side note I see 50 year old men and women driving S55's which makes me cry!!
Later Guys,
Amgboy



