S63 TT vs 57S
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kenilworth, il usa
Posts: 2,924
Received 378 Likes
on
244 Posts
'22 Alpina B7,'21 G63 Renntech obviously (wife), Wrangler(kids)
![Question](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/icons/icon5.gif)
I have an S63 TT Designo (in/out),perf. pckge ,scheduled for early December delivery but just got offered an '06 Maybach 57S Black/Black with only 9k miles and extended warranty for 3 years for the same $$.
What to do?
Magnificent car but in this economy and "bash the wealthy" attitude from every direction ,it scares me a bit as too ostentatious.
What say you?
What to do?
Magnificent car but in this economy and "bash the wealthy" attitude from every direction ,it scares me a bit as too ostentatious.
What say you?
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NoVa
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 S55 (SOLD, miss it every day), 2009 GL550
please choose your preferred response.
the S63 is such a pauper's car no one will ever know it was almost a Maybach
or
poor b@st@rd can only afford a *used* Maybach.
or
Did you get a bowl of soup with that S63?
the S63 is such a pauper's car no one will ever know it was almost a Maybach
or
poor b@st@rd can only afford a *used* Maybach.
or
Did you get a bowl of soup with that S63?
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
The Maybach will be a boring car.
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'08 M5, '10 Land Cruiser
Good question that's gotten a lot of useless answers thus far.
I'd stick with your S63 order (good job on the essential perf pkg). Reasons being-
1. The Maybach is old tech (W220 underpinnings and switchgear)
2. The 57 is kind of in "no man's land" and only the 62S makes sense to me
3. It'd be used rather than new
Of course the Maybach is much rarer but the bi-turbo S63s will take a fair while after release to become dime a dozen and flying under the radar is always a preference of mine. Perhaps rent a Maybach for a few days to get it out of your system but spend the real money on the forthcoming W221 AMG.
I'd stick with your S63 order (good job on the essential perf pkg). Reasons being-
1. The Maybach is old tech (W220 underpinnings and switchgear)
2. The 57 is kind of in "no man's land" and only the 62S makes sense to me
3. It'd be used rather than new
Of course the Maybach is much rarer but the bi-turbo S63s will take a fair while after release to become dime a dozen and flying under the radar is always a preference of mine. Perhaps rent a Maybach for a few days to get it out of your system but spend the real money on the forthcoming W221 AMG.
Last edited by Carl Lassiter; 10-02-2010 at 07:35 PM. Reason: just saw perf pkg in post1
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Piedmont, CA
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 S55
Weighing in ..
my opinion:
S63
If you're being driven, Maybach, but 62S .. which isn't an option you're putting out there.
if you're driving (which it sounds like you are), S63 all way.
if you get the Maybach and drive it, doesn't that kind of make you a chauffuer?
Of course, I have neither, and in the end you should always get what makes you happy!
S63
If you're being driven, Maybach, but 62S .. which isn't an option you're putting out there.
if you're driving (which it sounds like you are), S63 all way.
if you get the Maybach and drive it, doesn't that kind of make you a chauffuer?
Of course, I have neither, and in the end you should always get what makes you happy!
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Good question that's gotten a lot of useless answers thus far.
I'd stick with your S63 order (good job on the essential perf pkg). Reasons being-
1. The Maybach is old tech (W220 underpinnings and switchgear)
2. The 57 is kind of in "no man's land" and only the 62S makes sense to me
3. It'd be used rather than new
Of course the Maybach is much rarer but the bi-turbo S63s will take a fair while after release to become dime a dozen and flying under the radar is always a preference of mine. Perhaps rent a Maybach for a few days to get it out of your system but spend the real money on the forthcoming W221 AMG.
I'd stick with your S63 order (good job on the essential perf pkg). Reasons being-
1. The Maybach is old tech (W220 underpinnings and switchgear)
2. The 57 is kind of in "no man's land" and only the 62S makes sense to me
3. It'd be used rather than new
Of course the Maybach is much rarer but the bi-turbo S63s will take a fair while after release to become dime a dozen and flying under the radar is always a preference of mine. Perhaps rent a Maybach for a few days to get it out of your system but spend the real money on the forthcoming W221 AMG.
I totally agree.
I usually expect to see a chauffuer at the helm of a Maybach. The 57S is the "sporty" Maybach, but it is still 225.5" ...that is 19" longer than the S63.. and will likely weigh in over 1K pounds heavier than the new S63...
![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
I say get the S63 and don't look back.
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Tom
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kenilworth, il usa
Posts: 2,924
Received 378 Likes
on
244 Posts
'22 Alpina B7,'21 G63 Renntech obviously (wife), Wrangler(kids)
Carl,TMC M5 and shaw07:
Thanks for honest answer and comments,very much in line with my own thinking after all..
Thanks for honest answer and comments,very much in line with my own thinking after all..
#9
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: chicago burbs
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
fast cars and faster motorcycles ..
.
i don't know if it's such a slam dunk..
the maybach is RARE and has the bling, valet parking would be great in the city and it has a motor from GOD.
it would probably be the safest car for your family (if you hit something) along with being the most luxurious.
it will attract as much attention as a ferrari. it will draw a crowd.
the S63 will be quicker and much sportier (including accident avoidance) but won't have 738 lb-ft. torque.
it's MB's latest, greatest thing but there will be a bunch of them..
driving the 62 is like driving a limo because it is. but the back seats in the 62 are the best in the biz. like flying first class internationally.
are you driving the car or do you have a driver.. if you are driving it, apples and oranges.
i am sure that your family would appreciate the 57 and it's rear seat area more than you will when driving a 57.
drive the 57..
.
i don't know if it's such a slam dunk..
the maybach is RARE and has the bling, valet parking would be great in the city and it has a motor from GOD.
it would probably be the safest car for your family (if you hit something) along with being the most luxurious.
it will attract as much attention as a ferrari. it will draw a crowd.
the S63 will be quicker and much sportier (including accident avoidance) but won't have 738 lb-ft. torque.
it's MB's latest, greatest thing but there will be a bunch of them..
driving the 62 is like driving a limo because it is. but the back seats in the 62 are the best in the biz. like flying first class internationally.
are you driving the car or do you have a driver.. if you are driving it, apples and oranges.
i am sure that your family would appreciate the 57 and it's rear seat area more than you will when driving a 57.
drive the 57..
.
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
This response may get thrown in with the "useless answer" group which I found quite humorous by the way, but will the average "bash the wealthy" kind of guy know the difference between a Maybach and a big beautiful S63 Biturbo? I suspect not. Go with the new biturbo.
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Yes, the Maybach 57S has more presence.But I can kind of understand some of the apprehension on the "image" front. It is funny. A friend of mine works for a company over here where the CEO was driving a Maybach to work everyday a few years back. Then we went through that period of very high gas prices a couple years ago. The CEO started driving a Prius to work.
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Tom
#12
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
Mercedes S55 AMG
Hm, this is a an interesting dilemma! If you were comparing the Maybach 57S to the previous S63 AMG, then hands down the Maybach - because the performance would be similar so the Maybach wins on the other fronts, like rarity and exclusivity.
But...the new TT 2011 S63 AMG, with more horsepower and torque than its predecessor, will undoubtedly be more spirited to drive and faster. Sure, it is not as exclusive as the Maybach, but it is newer technology and not based on the W220 as the Maybach is. Plus, it will be brand new for the same price. The Maybach's most impressive attributes to me, are quite frankly the rear seats - but the 62 wins here over the 57. The ride and noise are also sublime. Aside from that, for autobahn burning fun, the TT S63 wins hands down.
But...the new TT 2011 S63 AMG, with more horsepower and torque than its predecessor, will undoubtedly be more spirited to drive and faster. Sure, it is not as exclusive as the Maybach, but it is newer technology and not based on the W220 as the Maybach is. Plus, it will be brand new for the same price. The Maybach's most impressive attributes to me, are quite frankly the rear seats - but the 62 wins here over the 57. The ride and noise are also sublime. Aside from that, for autobahn burning fun, the TT S63 wins hands down.
#14
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
8 Posts
GL550, C55, 335i Coupe, vintage Mustang
WSH is prepping his monologue about how dangerous that Maybach is with it's aging, non functional safety systems. He also thinks you should stick with the S63 because it will still have 8+ months of useful life left before you take delivery.
I say stick with the 63. If you think S class maintenance and repairs are expensive, try breaking a cupholder or the electrically controlled glovebox in the Maybach.
Nick
I say stick with the 63. If you think S class maintenance and repairs are expensive, try breaking a cupholder or the electrically controlled glovebox in the Maybach.
Nick
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kenilworth, il usa
Posts: 2,924
Received 378 Likes
on
244 Posts
'22 Alpina B7,'21 G63 Renntech obviously (wife), Wrangler(kids)
![Talking](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/icons/icon10.gif)
WSH is prepping his monologue about how dangerous that Maybach is with it's aging, non functional safety systems. He also thinks you should stick with the S63 because it will still have 8+ months of useful life left before you take delivery.
I say stick with the 63. If you think S class maintenance and repairs are expensive, try breaking a cupholder or the electrically controlled glovebox in the Maybach.
Nick
I say stick with the 63. If you think S class maintenance and repairs are expensive, try breaking a cupholder or the electrically controlled glovebox in the Maybach.
Nick
He also mentioned it's inadequate torque ,especially comparing to the vastly superior 65 series (that he is of course currently,allegedly driving)
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
#16
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: chicago burbs
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
fast cars and faster motorcycles ..
#17
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
Mercedes S55 AMG
That does bring up one of the better points - maintenance on the Maybach will undoubtedly be more expensive as from what I've seen, many items/systems on it seem to be much more expensive than on a regular S class. That makes sense - look at its price new compared to the S63.
#18
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
8 Posts
GL550, C55, 335i Coupe, vintage Mustang
Where do you have it serviced? My comment about the price of service is more regarding repairs. Maintenance will be right there with an S600, since it has the same basic powertrain. Brakes will cost more, but not out of this world.
Nick
#19
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: chicago burbs
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
fast cars and faster motorcycles ..
You have a 62? I like them for what they are, I think it looks sharper than the Phantom, and even though it doesn't have a "spirit of ecstasy" on the hood, I think it has a commanding presence.
Where do you have it serviced? My comment about the price of service is more regarding repairs. Maintenance will be right there with an S600, since it has the same basic powertrain. Brakes will cost more, but not out of this world.
Nick
Where do you have it serviced? My comment about the price of service is more regarding repairs. Maintenance will be right there with an S600, since it has the same basic powertrain. Brakes will cost more, but not out of this world.
Nick
had a 62, just went to Italy.. cool car but you need a driver and it needed more power.. i like my S65 better.
i prefer the design of the phantom but the 62 does have a presence. we parked it next to our tricked 430 in sobe and the 62 drew more attention.
serviced at MB of Ft. Lauderdale
.
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
#21
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: chicago burbs
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
fast cars and faster motorcycles ..
#22
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
Mercedes S55 AMG
Looks wise, I prefer the Phantom - even though I like the interior, especially the bach seat of the Maybach better. (No pun intended!
)
In Manhattan, you have so many S classes rolling around, that even the Maybach's blend in. I was in Manhattan today, and saw 2 62's. Even in Manhattan, the Rolls Royce Phantom has a very strong presence - not only are they the only ones around, but they have that extra charm that the Maybach lacks. (That's part of the appeal of the Maybach, it is understated on the outside but luxurious inside.)
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
In Manhattan, you have so many S classes rolling around, that even the Maybach's blend in. I was in Manhattan today, and saw 2 62's. Even in Manhattan, the Rolls Royce Phantom has a very strong presence - not only are they the only ones around, but they have that extra charm that the Maybach lacks. (That's part of the appeal of the Maybach, it is understated on the outside but luxurious inside.)
#23
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S63, G55
It's strange to see people (non chauffeurs) driving any type of Maybach.
Even 57S are used with chauffeurs here in NYC. I like them and see loads of them, but I'd stick with the S63 unless you employ a chauffeur.
Even 57S are used with chauffeurs here in NYC. I like them and see loads of them, but I'd stick with the S63 unless you employ a chauffeur.
#24
I would suggest being in the brand new sl63 TT.
It depends on the maybach though. Ive sat in 2.. one was a lightly optioned and one heavily optioned. It makes a HUGE difference in these cars.
It depends on the maybach though. Ive sat in 2.. one was a lightly optioned and one heavily optioned. It makes a HUGE difference in these cars.