C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

SUPERCHARGED m156, 63 amg !!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2010 | 05:23 PM
  #151  
LZH's Avatar
LZH
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 1
CLK 63 Black Series, 2009 S550, 2011 Range Rover Supercharged, BMW F800 GS Anniv Edition
Originally Posted by blackbenzz
+1! In my experience everything has MB tax unless you know somebody or you do it yourself. Just the way it is lol
R&D combined with sales volume give one a good indicator of consumer pricing. These MB tax comments are so stupid....just another way for someone to b!tch about owning something expensive and not wanting to pony up. Perhaps you should get a mustang if all you wanna do is go as fast as possible for as cheap as possible.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2010 | 05:27 PM
  #152  
dodger63's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,317
Likes: 3
From: Northport N.Y.
2013 f250 6.7 diesel
Originally Posted by LZH
R&D combined with sales volume give one a good indicator of consumer pricing. These MB tax comments are so stupid....just another way for someone to b!tch about owning something expensive and not wanting to pony up. Perhaps you should get a mustang if all you wanna do is go as fast as possible for as cheap as possible.
Why must you guys come on the c63 thread and call names and things if we want to call something tax it doesn't mean we can't afford it.. Seems like all you talk about is afford this afford that who cares? Give it a break!
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2010 | 05:28 PM
  #153  
dodger63's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,317
Likes: 3
From: Northport N.Y.
2013 f250 6.7 diesel
O yea carefull using the ! Point I got put on probation for that!
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2010 | 06:03 PM
  #154  
blackbenzz's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,489
Likes: 96
haters crazy
Originally Posted by LZH
R&D combined with sales volume give one a good indicator of consumer pricing. These MB tax comments are so stupid....just another way for someone to b!tch about owning something expensive and not wanting to pony up. Perhaps you should get a mustang if all you wanna do is go as fast as possible for as cheap as possible.
What do you have done to your CLK BS? What is available for the 55 motor that I don't have? I've done my own R&D and actually helped the community out minus the benz tax. Keep your comments to yourself thanks.

Last edited by blackbenzz; Dec 28, 2010 at 06:12 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2010 | 07:05 PM
  #155  
Vader13's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,069
Likes: 0
From: So-Cal
W211 E55 AMG, ML63 AMG, Past 996GT3,ZCPM3,Brabus C32,ML 500
I love Blowers, Nothing beats them.
I like the roar of my 63 motor, do not get me wrong ( in my ML) but the whining of a Blower on top of a V8 is real music. That thing is sick.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2010 | 08:44 PM
  #156  
LZH's Avatar
LZH
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 1
CLK 63 Black Series, 2009 S550, 2011 Range Rover Supercharged, BMW F800 GS Anniv Edition
Originally Posted by blackbenzz
What do you have done to your CLK BS? What is available for the 55 motor that I don't have? I've done my own R&D and actually helped the community out minus the benz tax. Keep your comments to yourself thanks.

So now your going to take credit for the R&D for a Kleemann blower?? Or headers or the tune on your hooptie - since when did you start writing code ?? And because I have chosen to leave my car somewhat stock I can't comment here ?? Hey, you're the one whining about the "MB tax" and what one has to do to get around it...it's a public forum...if you don't want other members to comment about what you say then quit posting.

And you never answered me (for the second time) about my bet to run our cars - perhaps you should pay more attention to your sig line and and quit running your mouth if you can't back it up.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2010 | 09:10 PM
  #157  
Lenin's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 27
From: North NJ
2002 C32 AMG, 2013 GLK 350/4, 2015 E63S AMG Wagon
Originally Posted by LZH

So now your going to take credit for the R&D for a Kleemann blower?? Or headers or the tune on your hooptie - since when did you start writing code ?? And because I have chosen to leave my car somewhat stock I can't comment here ?? Hey, you're the one whining about the "MB tax" and what one has to do to get around it...it's a public forum...if you don't want other members to comment about what you say then quit posting.

And you never answered me (for the second time) about my bet to run our cars - perhaps you should pay more attention to your sig line and and quit running your mouth if you can't back it up.
Take a chill pill. Blackbenzz was not the first one in this discussion to mention the MB Tax. You are obviously taking it way too personally. Let it go. His car is faster.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2010 | 12:19 AM
  #158  
C63 Guy's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 640
Likes: 1
none
Originally Posted by PetroC63
This is very interesting info.

So the 2010 63's have a higher torque capacity because of this K1 modification. Just curious, were did you acquire this info?

Thanks,
Mike
To make a long story short(er), a friend that's a transmission specialist at a local dealership was chatting up the instructor at a training class and it came up first in regards to the SL63s with the MCT killing trans' then he asked about the C's (in reference to my car) and the instructor said that all the 722s were getting the upgrade for 2010 and that the new carriers were the de facto replacement/warranty parts going forward.

So there's that.

And in regards to this whole MB tax business, we're buying parts made in smaller quantities, using higher quality materials and built to tighter tolerances/higher finish standards... Our stuff HAS to cost more.

Josh
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Mercedes Teases Updated EQS With Steer-By-Wire and a Yoke

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

8 Mercedes Models With Poor Reliability Records

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

Magnificent New Mercedes-Maybach S-Class Revealed: 12 Things to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Dec 29, 2010 | 07:13 AM
  #159  
MRAMG1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,341
Likes: 11
From: PA
S600, GL450, Audi A5 Cab
Originally Posted by C63 Guy
And in regards to this whole MB tax business,1 we're buying parts made in smaller quantities, 2using higher quality materials and built to tighter tolerances/higher finish standards... 3Our stuff HAS to cost more.

Josh
In regards to your comments in numerical order:

1. THIS alone is what causes the MB tax. Limited run, with very few potential customers does indeed cause higher pricing. I can attest to this as Auburn would not make me a custom diff due to the previous stated facts. I was even one of their sponsored cars a few years back, and they turned me down because of this.

2. Well, this one I do not agree with as a stead fast rule. A stainless header is a stainless header. IF they are made out of the same material. A cam shaft for ALL engines is machined to the same strict stats. But again, how many MB people will buck up and actually buy one, hence the higher price.

3. To some extent I will go along with this as the demand is so low. I would bet that less than 5% of MB owners ever even think about modifying their toys.

Oh well, just had to vent a little, as I really do hate the high prices on such few mods for our toys, IMHO.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2010 | 09:06 AM
  #160  
obsidian05e55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,278
Likes: 3
From: Livingston NJ
C63, Grigio Medio E46 M3
This is were the "Have to pay to play" comes from i guess..

Im going to wait to see what pans out with this. I was ready to order my headers, but i guess I'll wait to see the blower results, and reliability. I dont mind the obnoxious LTH sound. My neighbors are a good distance from me.

-Walter
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2010 | 11:28 AM
  #161  
brad @ evosport's Avatar
PREMIER SPONSOR
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,922
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach, CA
None fast enough!
Headers and the S/C will work together very well IMHO. I should know very soon. =)

thanks
Brad
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2010 | 11:36 AM
  #162  
Sincity's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,983
Likes: 21
From: Vegas and Vancouver, BC
.
Originally Posted by brad @ evosport
Headers and the S/C will work together very well IMHO. I should know very soon. =)

thanks
Brad


I'm just wondering who is behind the tune.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2010 | 11:53 AM
  #163  
PetroC63's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 2
From: North Jersey
2012 CTS-V
Originally Posted by C63 Guy
To make a long story short(er), a friend that's a transmission specialist at a local dealership was chatting up the instructor at a training class and it came up first in regards to the SL63s with the MCT killing trans' then he asked about the C's (in reference to my car) and the instructor said that all the 722s were getting the upgrade for 2010 and that the new carriers were the de facto replacement/warranty parts going forward.

So there's that.
Thanks for the info Josh. Makes me feel even better about my 2010.

And in regards to this whole MB tax business, we're buying parts made in smaller quantities, using higher quality materials and built to tighter tolerances/higher finish standards... Our stuff HAS to cost more.

Josh
I agree, I have no problem with some of the prices for our cars and
if I did I wouldn't spend the money.

Thanks again for the info.


Mike
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2010 | 12:03 PM
  #164  
blackbenzz's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,489
Likes: 96
haters crazy
Originally Posted by brad @ evosport
Headers and the S/C will work together very well IMHO. I should know very soon. =)

thanks
Brad
Based on experience yes it will make alot more power. The issue is can the trans/engine handle the extra power
Originally Posted by LZH

So now your going to take credit for the R&D for a Kleemann blower?? Or headers or the tune on your hooptie - since when did you start writing code ??
Of course not. Kleemann did a very good job doing that R&D, no point in reinventing the wheel. Actually with blower, headers, LSD and tune the best the car ever ran was 11.8ish. Where did the rest of it come from? As for tune... I have a way of tweaking it slightly and yes I put in my input when my car is being tuned. If I had software I'd tune it myself (The reason why I'm leaning towards gong standalone). Be my guest and call Cory at Kleemann and he will tell you how many things I have pioneered on this setup (not the blower or headers but everything around it or on it). Or just do a search on the forum and see. I have helped alot of people go faster. Wish you would try and do the same instead of just talking trash. Even your buddy has asked me for help in the past. What have you contributed? How fast is the next fastest Kleemann supercharged car? So then how is my car so much faster if I haven't done any R&D?

Last edited by blackbenzz; Dec 29, 2010 at 12:06 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2010 | 11:59 PM
  #165  
LZH's Avatar
LZH
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 1
CLK 63 Black Series, 2009 S550, 2011 Range Rover Supercharged, BMW F800 GS Anniv Edition
Originally Posted by blackbenzz
Based on experience yes it will make alot more power. The issue is can the trans/engine handle the extra power

Of course not. Kleemann did a very good job doing that R&D, no point in reinventing the wheel. Actually with blower, headers, LSD and tune the best the car ever ran was 11.8ish. Where did the rest of it come from? As for tune... I have a way of tweaking it slightly and yes I put in my input when my car is being tuned. If I had software I'd tune it myself (The reason why I'm leaning towards gong standalone). Be my guest and call Cory at Kleemann and he will tell you how many things I have pioneered on this setup (not the blower or headers but everything around it or on it). Or just do a search on the forum and see. I have helped alot of people go faster. Wish you would try and do the same instead of just talking trash. Even your buddy has asked me for help in the past. What have you contributed? How fast is the next fastest Kleemann supercharged car? So then how is my car so much faster if I haven't done any R&D?
OMG someone certainly thinks a lot of himself. Your narrow mindedness is funny...I guess you think every person with a modified Benz posts about it here, right ? Certainly no other Benz in the world is faster than yours Your no different than every other fly by night bench racer who stands on the shoulders of giants and demands the same respect. Yet, with your ultimate awesomness you can't even accept a little bet and continue to dodge the question while holding yourself up on some golden pedestal as if your contributions to an internet forum have put you in line for a Nobel Prize. Get over yourself kiddo and man up and accept my bet or STFU.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2010 | 12:03 AM
  #166  
dodger63's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,317
Likes: 3
From: Northport N.Y.
2013 f250 6.7 diesel
Could u please fish somewhere else !

Originally Posted by LZH
OMG someone certainly thinks a lot of himself. Your narrow mindedness is funny...I guess you think every person with a modified Benz posts about it here, right ? Certainly no other Benz in the world is faster than yours Your no different than every other fly by night bench racer who stands on the shoulders of giants and demands the same respect. Yet, with your ultimate awesomness you can't even accept a little bet and continue to dodge the question while holding yourself up on some golden pedestal as if your contributions to an internet forum have put you in line for a Nobel Prize. Get over yourself kiddo and man up and accept my bet or STFU.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2010 | 07:31 AM
  #167  
betrezra's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 68
From: Texas
C63 507 AMG DA Car #19
Unless you're using a laptop with tweecer or something similar (by your self) to actually tune the car you're really not doing anything more than being a paid customer to one of the prof tuners out there IMHO.

That is where our hands are tied as mb enthusiasts... no-one has let the user "in the door" so to speak where we get the laptop, fuel tables, timing tables maps. Until you're doing that you're merely a customer. Which is fun in it's own light. I'm in that camp for now.

If you're not building new hardware, or modifying old hardware, or actually punching the keys to make the tune better.... then how can you be an RandD guy?

I guess you can support RandD with your wallet. Howard Hughes style.

I'm taking the easy way out on an old proven platform.... with my clk55K...... I'm having a shop install a pile of parts in a combo that has been done before many times..... there may be some little special sauce in the tune but at the end of the day I'm taking the easy way out. It's hard to be a pioneer in this high dollar amg mod world..... I give mad props to anyone forging ahead with a truly NEW combination of parts in such an expensive platform. Mad props.

Last edited by betrezra; Dec 30, 2010 at 07:35 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2010 | 10:07 AM
  #168  
blackbenzz's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,489
Likes: 96
haters crazy
Originally Posted by betrezra
Unless you're using a laptop with tweecer or something similar (by your self) to actually tune the car you're really not doing anything more than being a paid customer to one of the prof tuners out there IMHO.

That is where our hands are tied as mb enthusiasts... no-one has let the user "in the door" so to speak where we get the laptop, fuel tables, timing tables maps. Until you're doing that you're merely a customer. Which is fun in it's own light. I'm in that camp for now.

If you're not building new hardware, or modifying old hardware, or actually punching the keys to make the tune better.... then how can you be an RandD guy?

I guess you can support RandD with your wallet. Howard Hughes style.

I'm taking the easy way out on an old proven platform.... with my clk55K...... I'm having a shop install a pile of parts in a combo that has been done before many times..... there may be some little special sauce in the tune but at the end of the day I'm taking the easy way out. It's hard to be a pioneer in this high dollar amg mod world..... I give mad props to anyone forging ahead with a truly NEW combination of parts in such an expensive platform. Mad props.
I wish I was a paid customer lol. I have modified hardware and made new ones as well as tested new products (testing new/modified hardware is R&D by definition right?). I didn't write the code no, but I told the tuner where to add/remove fuel/timing. But in terms of actually pushing the keys you are correct I did not. And you can still tweak the final numbers slightly afterwards. You asked about advice on mods on my car in the past (as recently as yesterday) and said you would copy them . There is no other CLK out there with the combo of parts I have. I dont understand how it was proven unless you consider what I've done as proving something Good luck to you. I look forward to seeing your 1/4 numbers

Lets get back on topic, can't wait to see the results! And yes I give props to anyone who takes a new path to develop/test new products!

Last edited by blackbenzz; Dec 30, 2010 at 10:10 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2010 | 10:17 AM
  #169  
betrezra's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 68
From: Texas
C63 507 AMG DA Car #19
No disrespect blackbenzz,,, actually the opposite... as I'm doing my best to dig up all your tricks/tips.. which don't come easy ...... so I can copy from where you left off.
Unless I can drop 1 second with a convetor/clutch packs I really don't see coming close to your numbers without some serious wgt reduction!!!!! Your car sets a high bar.
A s/c c63 will be something to behold...... and this will apply to several 63 platforms....... clk63 (nonbs), ml63, cls63, e63, s63.......

Last edited by betrezra; Dec 30, 2010 at 10:23 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2010 | 10:46 AM
  #170  
blackbenzz's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,489
Likes: 96
haters crazy
Originally Posted by betrezra
No disrespect blackbenzz,,, actually the opposite... as I'm doing my best to dig up all your tricks/tips.. which don't come easy ...... so I can copy from where you left off.
Unless I can drop 1 second with a convetor/clutch packs I really don't see coming close to your numbers without some serious wgt reduction!!!!! Your car sets a high bar.
A s/c c63 will be something to behold...... and this will apply to several 63 platforms....... clk63 (nonbs), ml63, cls63, e63, s63.......
No worries and thanks. I hope to see your car in the tens too

Yea I can't wait to see the sc 63's rollin around
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2010 | 01:10 PM
  #171  
betrezra's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 68
From: Texas
C63 507 AMG DA Car #19
Dyno Review

I pulled together some dyno data of a few cars for comparison. I would love to see a C63-Kompressor on this chart as well.

CLK55-Kleemann (Cams, Headers, Kleemann Eaton, Tune)
SLK55-Kleemann (Headers, Kleemann Eaton, Tune)
C63-(Long tubes, Tune)
C63-Stock

I need to add a CLK55 stock graph up for kicks.

Disclaimer - Take this with a grain of salt, different days, different dyno's... we all know how you can jack with dyno charts to make the customer happy





With the stock CLK55 added:

Last edited by betrezra; Dec 30, 2010 at 01:27 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2010 | 01:40 PM
  #172  
OBwan's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by albokid718
im still in shock haha... i have heard though that ess has resently got there hands on a c63 wonder if ther're planning on supercharging a 63 as well??
ESS is developing a supercharger. When I had my car tuned by them we discussed the project. I believe they said they are shooting for a spring / summer 2011 release. Im trying to get them to let me help with testing If I can get any more info I will let you guys know.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 11:28 PM
  #173  
albokid718's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
2009 c63
any new updates with this system???
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2011 | 02:55 PM
  #174  
Cory @ Kleemann's Avatar
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
I'm not sure where you're getting your info, but I'm afraid it is incorrect. KLEEMANN never developed a S/C for the M156, or even tried for that matter. It was realized early on (as in an idea scribbled on a piece of paper) that it would be prohibitively expensive, so that piece of paper was filed in the trash. Furthermore, M156 throttle bodies were not an evolution of a product developed for a supercharged engine (again, KLEEMANN never even attempted to develop such a product).


Originally Posted by RStevens63
It should be noted that Kleemann was one of the first tuners to try and fail at supercharging the M156. I believe they got past this stage (getting it to run and idle) as well (MKB too) but the real problems began to surface with the next stages of progression.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2011 | 03:01 PM
  #175  
RStevens63's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
E63
Originally Posted by Cory @ Kleemann
I'm not sure where you're getting your info, but I'm afraid it is incorrect. KLEEMANN never developed a S/C for the M156, or even tried for that matter. It was realized early on (as in an idea scribbled on a piece of paper) that it would be prohibitively expensive, so that piece of paper was filed in the trash. Furthermore, M156 throttle bodies were not an evolution of a product developed for a supercharged engine (again, KLEEMANN never even attempted to develop such a product).
Hoarst, the former KLEEMANN employee in Europe used to depend on for all their hardware design and modification. It went far beyond paper, but say what you want. Point is it didn't happen due to both hardware and software constraints.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50 PM.

story-0
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-1
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-2
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-3
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-5
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE
story-7
Mercedes Teases Updated EQS With Steer-By-Wire and a Yoke

Slideshow: The 2027 update adds a fully digital steering system, revised styling, and potential charging upgrades as the company looks to revive interest in the luxury EV.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-04 10:24:38


VIEW MORE
story-8
8 Mercedes Models With Poor Reliability Records

Slideshow: From problematic air suspensions to early dual-clutch transmission issues, these specific models and years stand out as the least dependable modern Mercedes vehicles.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-26 18:08:10


VIEW MORE
story-9
Magnificent New Mercedes-Maybach S-Class Revealed: 12 Things to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes-Maybach has refreshed the S-Class with new lighting signatures, AI-driven software, and even more elaborate rear-seat luxury.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-25 18:01:51


VIEW MORE