SL-Class (R129) 1990-2002: SL 280, SL 300, SL 320, SL 500, SL 600, SL 60 AMG

SL/R129: Supercharger or 7.2 for my V12 ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-15-2005, 02:23 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Pigzmickey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Adelaide, Australia. Formerly Bristol, UK.
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1998 SL 600 ///AMG. 1997 SL 320. 1999 SLK 230K. 2001 BMW R850.
Supercharger or 7.2 for my V12 ?

I've been quoted $3000 to have my SL600 bored to 7.2l, on the other hand I'm waiting on a quote for an American supercharger which could be fitted in Holland.
Eventually I'll have to make a decision on which option I go for.

Which do you think would be better / more exciting...
Attached Thumbnails Supercharger or 7.2 for my V12 ?-side-2.1.jpg   Supercharger or 7.2 for my V12 ?-s.jpg  
Old 05-15-2005, 02:41 PM
  #2  
Member
 
TheV12pwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: L.A.
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SL000
Is this a joke????????

Maybe you mean $30.000 ....
for $3000 you can get the new pistons only
Old 05-15-2005, 03:08 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Pigzmickey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Adelaide, Australia. Formerly Bristol, UK.
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1998 SL 600 ///AMG. 1997 SL 320. 1999 SLK 230K. 2001 BMW R850.
Originally Posted by TheV12pwr
Maybe you mean $30.000 ....
for $3000 you can get the new pistons only
My local engineering company has quoted me £2000 ($3000) to bore the engine & fit the new rings required, no need for new pistons!?!

I've used this company before on an old 1968 MGB GT, I'm happy with they're work.

Apparently the extra skim is so tiny that the same pistons are re-used, just new rings. Remember, the increase is dispersed across 12 cylinders!
Still, I'll seek further "qualified" advice before committing...
Old 05-15-2005, 04:55 PM
  #4  
Member
 
TheV12pwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: L.A.
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SL000
So Funny

Just wonderin'...who is gonna take the engine apart...you?, or this is included in the price.
You are so funny
You have NOOOO idea...just new rings a?
Post the same thread in the tech help...let them know what is goin' on in UK

This is NOT yours IS IT?
Attached Images
File Type: bmp
theV12pwr.bmp (666.2 KB, 774 views)

Last edited by TheV12pwr; 05-15-2005 at 05:11 PM.
Old 05-15-2005, 08:58 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
blueSL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,447
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
SL55 AMG
This guy is a dreamer...

Working on your MGB GT, a relic from the forerunner of the failed MG Rover, does not in any way qualify them to work on the V12. The capacity increase from 6 to 7.2 litres (+20%) requires an increase of 9.54% in the bore which is hardly tiny.

Dream on...

Last edited by blueSL; 05-15-2005 at 09:54 PM.
Old 05-16-2005, 03:44 AM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Pigzmickey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Adelaide, Australia. Formerly Bristol, UK.
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1998 SL 600 ///AMG. 1997 SL 320. 1999 SLK 230K. 2001 BMW R850.
Originally Posted by blueSL
This guy is a dreamer...

Working on your MGB GT, a relic from the forerunner of the failed MG Rover, does not in any way qualify them to work on the V12...
I thought an engine was an engine no matter what size / displacement! And yes, previously I had the engine removed for machine work.

Dreamer eh! We hear alot about your cars & knowledge, only we never see'm!

Quick, you better get your camera out & visit the west end!?!
Old 05-16-2005, 03:55 AM
  #7  
Super Member
 
Paul Le Corre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: troyes, france
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ML 320 CDI
Impossible!!!

Carlsson and Brabus used to make 7.3L kit for the R129 and both charged more than 50000$ for the kit+installation.
Old 05-16-2005, 05:12 AM
  #8  
Member
 
SL60 ///AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Norrtälje, Sweden
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL60 ///AMG
Originally Posted by Pigzmickey
.... Apparently the extra skim is so tiny that the same pistons are re-used, just new rings. Remember, the increase is dispersed across 12 cylinders!
I agree with blueSL that it´is no way that you can increase the volyme to 7.2 litre without change the pistons or crankshaft. Perhaps the engineering company mean that they should "horna" (swedish, I don´t know the english word but it´s aboute polish the cylinder) to take away marks and scratch. In that case it is sufficient to only replace the rings around the pistons (skim?). However, that will not give you the 7.2 litre.
/Håkan

Last edited by SL60 ///AMG; 05-16-2005 at 05:16 AM.
Old 05-16-2005, 06:29 PM
  #9  
Almost a Member!
 
RUCKDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1992 500SL (wife); 1996 Dodge Viper RT/10
Sorry, I left this site - sold my 500SL, but when I saw this post, I just had to respond !!!
Ain't No Way.
SL600 Bore is 89mm, Stroke is 80.2mm
In order to obtain 7.2L, leaving the stroke the same (80.2mm), the bore must be 97mm, an increase of 8mm.
How big is 8mm, you European metric system users tell me (over a 1/4 inch), but there are no piston rings that can take up that much slop. Now, if the crank is welded and offset ground to obtain a longer stroke, and head shims (thicker head gaskets) are used to compensate for the pistons popping up above the block, or use shorter rods, and the head cc volume reduced to keep the compression ratio at stock, and, and, and............, you got $30,000+, that's thirty thousand.
Later; maybe gone, unless I see something else as insane as this.
Old 05-16-2005, 11:48 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
blueSL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,447
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
SL55 AMG
I agree...
Old 05-17-2005, 03:56 AM
  #11  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Pigzmickey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Adelaide, Australia. Formerly Bristol, UK.
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1998 SL 600 ///AMG. 1997 SL 320. 1999 SLK 230K. 2001 BMW R850.
Originally Posted by blueSL
I agree...
Well it looks like this option is a non starter then... How about the supercharger? I'm still waiting on the quote...
Old 05-17-2005, 04:02 AM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
blueSL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,447
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
SL55 AMG
I don't think you should bother. Your car is worth, what, £15k? If you modify it, it will be close to nothing, no-one is going to touch it. Just enjoy that car as it is...
Old 05-17-2005, 04:25 AM
  #13  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Pigzmickey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Adelaide, Australia. Formerly Bristol, UK.
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1998 SL 600 ///AMG. 1997 SL 320. 1999 SLK 230K. 2001 BMW R850.
Originally Posted by blueSL
I don't think you should bother. Your car is worth, what, £15k? If you modify it, it will be close to nothing, no-one is going to touch it. Just enjoy that car as it is...
15K?
Old 05-17-2005, 06:19 AM
  #14  
Member
 
SL60 ///AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Norrtälje, Sweden
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL60 ///AMG
Originally Posted by blueSL
.... Your car is worth, what, £15k? If you modify it, it will be close to nothing, no-one is going to touch it. Just enjoy that car as it is...
I dont´know the price in UK but £15k seem little. It´s all about maintenance, condition and how rare the car is. In Sweden the price is way over £22k for a SL600 from 98 in good condition. My self, I would´t sell my car even if I got £30k. The funny thing is that I have had two offers from ..... Germany :p

However, I agree with blueSL about that a supercharger will drop the value drastic. Just enjoy it as it is, and spend your money to get it to mint condition.

Last edited by SL60 ///AMG; 05-17-2005 at 06:49 AM.
Old 05-17-2005, 08:15 AM
  #15  
Almost a Member!
 
KLP 92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Middlesex, London
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mercedes SL600, S600, C250 TD
Originally Posted by blueSL
I don't think you should bother. Your car is worth, what, £15k? If you modify it, it will be close to nothing, no-one is going to touch it. Just enjoy that car as it is...

In the UK the SL600 is not worth that much. My car stands about £17k, but you see them advertised at £25k+ but they never sell. Too expensive to run and maintain for the British. If you went to P/x a 1998 car £17-18k is the price.

Last edited by KLP 92; 05-17-2005 at 05:02 PM.
Old 05-17-2005, 08:31 AM
  #16  
Almost a Member!
 
KLP 92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Middlesex, London
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mercedes SL600, S600, C250 TD
And noone wants to buy a modified SL600. It doesn't appeal to the boy racers as their pockets aren't that deep, and majority of people who are after a car like that will want a stock original.
Old 05-17-2005, 10:03 PM
  #17  
Member
 
TheV12pwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: L.A.
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SL000
Originally Posted by Pigzmickey
Well it looks like this option is a non starter then... How about the supercharger? I'm still waiting on the quote...
If you have an extra cash to burn...$8-10k go for it!
To me, you are not ready for any improvments yet,or U R too late for it...
Resale value depends...
if you are thinking of selin' it,why do you even bother???
Attached Images
File Type: bmp
theV12pwrspercharged.bmp (675.3 KB, 1044 views)
Old 05-18-2005, 04:02 AM
  #18  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Pigzmickey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Adelaide, Australia. Formerly Bristol, UK.
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1998 SL 600 ///AMG. 1997 SL 320. 1999 SLK 230K. 2001 BMW R850.
I don't want to sell it, I'm hoping to take it to Australia with me when I migrate next year. As for value, I was recently offered £21K. I think the value depends on many things, condition, colour, mileage, options, rarety, etc...

I am happy with it, I think it's a very smooth & averagely fast car for £20K. As for fuel, I don't think it's that bad, I only got about an extra 50 - 75 miles per tank from my SL 320.

And V12pwr, whose engine is it that you keep posting? It's not mine:
Attached Thumbnails Supercharger or 7.2 for my V12 ?-dsc00636.jpg  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL/R129: Supercharger or 7.2 for my V12 ?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:27 AM.