SL/R129: Supercharger or 7.2 for my V12 ?
Eventually I'll have to make a decision on which option I go for.
Which do you think would be better / more exciting...
for $3000 you can get the new pistons only

I've used this company before on an old 1968 MGB GT, I'm happy with they're work.
Apparently the extra skim is so tiny that the same pistons are re-used, just new rings. Remember, the increase is dispersed across 12 cylinders!
Still, I'll seek further "qualified" advice before committing...
You are so funny
You have NOOOO idea...just new rings a?
Post the same thread in the tech help...let them know what is goin' on in UK
This is NOT yours IS IT?
Last edited by TheV12pwr; May 15, 2005 at 05:11 PM.
Working on your MGB GT, a relic from the forerunner of the failed MG Rover, does not in any way qualify them to work on the V12. The capacity increase from 6 to 7.2 litres (+20%) requires an increase of 9.54% in the bore which is hardly tiny.
Dream on...
Last edited by blueSL; May 15, 2005 at 09:54 PM.
Working on your MGB GT, a relic from the forerunner of the failed MG Rover, does not in any way qualify them to work on the V12...
Dreamer eh! We hear alot about your cars & knowledge, only we never see'm!
Quick, you better get your camera out & visit the west end!?!
Trending Topics
/Håkan
Last edited by SL60 ///AMG; May 16, 2005 at 05:16 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Ain't No Way.
SL600 Bore is 89mm, Stroke is 80.2mm
In order to obtain 7.2L, leaving the stroke the same (80.2mm), the bore must be 97mm, an increase of 8mm.
How big is 8mm, you European metric system users tell me (over a 1/4 inch), but there are no piston rings that can take up that much slop. Now, if the crank is welded and offset ground to obtain a longer stroke, and head shims (thicker head gaskets) are used to compensate for the pistons popping up above the block, or use shorter rods, and the head cc volume reduced to keep the compression ratio at stock, and, and, and............, you got $30,000+, that's thirty thousand.
Later; maybe gone, unless I see something else as insane as this.
However, I agree with blueSL about that a supercharger will drop the value drastic. Just enjoy it as it is, and spend your money to get it to mint condition.
Last edited by SL60 ///AMG; May 17, 2005 at 06:49 AM.
In the UK the SL600 is not worth that much. My car stands about £17k, but you see them advertised at £25k+ but they never sell. Too expensive to run and maintain for the British. If you went to P/x a 1998 car £17-18k is the price.
Last edited by KLP 92; May 17, 2005 at 05:02 PM.
To me, you are not ready for any improvments yet,or U R too late for it...
Resale value depends...
if you are thinking of selin' it,why do you even bother???
I am happy with it, I think it's a very smooth & averagely fast car for £20K. As for fuel, I don't think it's that bad, I only got about an extra 50 - 75 miles per tank from my SL 320.
And V12pwr, whose engine is it that you keep posting? It's not mine:



