SL/R129: R129 to R230 Comparison
Not many R230 owners would be following this forum any longer. Why would they? I don’t follow the R170 forum.
I have seen it written that the R230 does not have the “hewn from solid” material that the R129 does. We can all relate to that solid feeling.
Performance will be similar SL 500 R230 vrs R129.
What about the Active Body Control? Is that significant? I can take corners as fast as traction will allow in my R129 … and in relative comfort.
I personally am very interested in the R129 SL 600. Even though I would use that extra torque and horse power only ½% of the time. Then again the SL 500 is very satisfying from a power point of view. Why does one need more?
Last edited by ChrisB; Nov 5, 2005 at 01:47 PM.
in and out...I have seen a 02 R230 looking already shabby inside....
So there isn't a wide gap between the two..
What the R230 gains in modernism it looses in quality.
Finally,MB built great cars till 1999...so they say!!!
As for the 230 models, I guess time will tell... Although I bet the new SL 65 is rather rapid with its twin turbo's!?!
Last edited by Pigzmickey; Nov 5, 2005 at 10:03 AM.
Great for passing at highway speeds.
Finally,MB built great cars till 1999...so they say!!!
So great SLs extend to 2002, the end ot the R129 modle series at least.
For some reason people don't recognize my car as SL500. I was driving with a woman friend of mine, in my baby, and she had been going on and on about how pretty my baby is, and we passed her neighbor's R129, and I pointed out that it was the same type of car, and she was surprised.
But the point is, that these cars are built well enough to where people think they are brand new even when they are 5 years old. There is very little wear on the interior. The exception is the speaker mesh on the driver's door. I have noticed that it is almost always worn out on the R129's, I guess because it is hard to get out without rubbing your shoe there.
If one mantain's the exterior, they look good and new for years and years. I don't know if the R230's do that. I guess only time can tell.
Oh, one more point . . . when the R129's came out they were pushing $100,000 in price. In 1990 (that's probably about $140,000 in today's dollars) . You can get a brand new R230 for about the same price, I think.
So, in terms of today's dollars, the R129's were more expensive cars. Thus, one might expect a decrease in quality, no?
On my wife's recommendation I mixed up Ivoy Snow Deterget (very gentle) and warm water. Then damp sponged and towell botted & patted them dry several times in one clean up effort.
They came pot looking brand new.
My cloth covers werer not scuffed to the point of tearing the fabric. Maybe yours are?
2) Same with he mesh wind screen. It had blotchy water arksthat were quiote unsightly. I thook the frame off and emersed it in the bath tub witht Ivory Snow. Scrubbed li ghtly with my hands and folwed the stationary water through the mesh wityh a pumping / filtering actrion. Hosed it off with the shower. Let it iiiidry. Again. It looks brand new.
Trending Topics
Then realized in a split second. Hey I've got one of those at home!
Last edited by ChrisB; Nov 5, 2005 at 04:03 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
17,000 Km. Broken in! Oh Ya! I really wanted to go for a test drive.
I had to go out of town the first weekend.
Last weekend my wife firmly announced she thought it was a complete wate of time. That took the fun out of it.
This week end the car has been sold.
I will have to wait for my chance to experience the Bi-turbo V12.
With some luck, in the mean time … perhaps I will earn the cash necessary to making such a car a reality rather than a dream. Wouldn’t that be nice?
It would be lovely to have 600 horses under your foot,but where will you go?
A car like that is made to sit on an autobahn at 240 km and keep there all day...It's a shame to drive beasts like that on restricted roads or worse
in crowded towns..
I think the 500 SL's are the best choice to have in terms of power and usability and value for money..
It would be lovely to have 600 horses under your foot,but where will you go? ... A car like that is made to sit on an autobahn at 240 km and keep there all day...It's a shame to drive beasts like that on restricted roads ... I think the 500 SL's are the best choice to have in terms of power and usability and value for money..

If money were less of an object ... i would be a different story.
Last edited by ChrisB; Dec 8, 2005 at 01:12 AM.
frustrated just looking at it...
Trafic light starts would become boring after a while,as no one in his right mind would race you,and top speed runs would have to be on the ring in Germany...
Then again ,if I had 50 millions $ doing nothing ,I'll buy it and put is in a glass house to be admired....
BTW,I came across a 380 SEC 1985 yesterday going for $2000.
The cheapest and one of the most beautiful Mercs I have ever seen..
I might buy it and restore it to former glory....
Not many R230 owners would be following this forum any longer. Why would they? I don’t follow the R170 forum.
I have seen it written that the R230 does not have the “hewn from solid” material that the R129 does. We can all relate to that solid feeling.
Performance will be similar SL 500 R230 vrs R129.
What about the Active Body Control? Is that significant? I can take corners as fast as traction will allow in my R129 … and in relative comfort.
I personally am very interested in the R129 SL 600. Even though I would use that extra torque and horse power only ½% of the time. Then again the SL 500 is very satisfying from a power point of view. Why does one need more?
The ABC in my R129 V12 did not feel different from my current R230 500. You will be able to take corners about as fast as you do in the R129. The V12 I owned was a killer. I loved having the V12 and could drive the absolute hane out of it w/ no problems. It is always good to have the extra power! What other questions do you have for R120 SL600 vs. R230 SL500?
Whatever it is, it's cool!
Wow, 84 MPH in reverse. That would be crazy.
How often driving the R230 SL 500 do you find yourself saying I wished I still had more power of the V12?
How often driving the R230 SL 500 do you find yourself saying I wished I still had more power of the V12?
The R230 V12 has similar performance comaired to the SL55 on paper. But I read that the stock Bi-turbo has muh better highway passing power delivery.
Plus the availabiltiy of after mlrket tuning paciiikages (like Renntech) for the SL600 bi-turbo turn it into a mind blowing monster.
I'd want to test drive the R230 SL600 if I was in the position of upgrading from the R230 SL500.
If you do test drive the R230 SL600 , please write up you driving impressions and comparisons.
It seems you really like the SL55 extra power. You had a R129 SL600 before.
In terms of the R230 ... on the R230 forum I read a post recently for someone who said in essence "We all love our R230 SL500 cars. So watch what you do. If you drive the R230 SL600 you will hate your R230 SL500".
Regards
Actually, it was not. I guess with all the posers out there I can't really blame you
, but Mr. Rockwell is not the only individual with some knowledge of automobiles. Regardless, I did check out his site after your post and enjoyed reading his notes. Just wanted to clarify.Regards







