SL/R230: SL500 vs Porsche 911
A 911 is quite a bit lighter than an SL and will handle transitions more quickly. As result it will run faster times on a road course, other things being equal. SLs also only come with automatic transmissions. If a person finds fun in manually shifting gears and engaging the clutch, a manny tranny 911 would necessarily be more fun.
However I and others find the SL to be immensely fun to drive. The engines are terrific, from the naturally aspirated V8s to the twin turbo V12s. The drivetrain is bulletproof. Steering is tight and precise. The brakes are also very good if light and subtle (and sometimes incorrectly described as "numb").
On a nice day, on an open road, with the top down, and the engine putting immense power to the wheels, the SL is an incredibly fun car to drive.
FWIW....
Last edited by jmf003; Apr 18, 2009 at 01:32 PM. Reason: fixed typo
When one considers the "fun to drive" part of a car it is a matter of opinion. I, for one, would prefer the SL for daily driving. On a track though, I'd go with the 911.
Rook
Quickness wise, the SL500 has great torque and "feels" faster off the line, BUT, there is no question that the 911 is the faster car overall. Both are great!! Different cars for different purposes.
the 911 is a true drivers car and the sl500 is more the cruiser in my opinion
other might tell me the sl500 handles great and is fast....this is true to an extent
the car has good torque but honestly not that fast also it handlse well for a car its size but definitely not the best handling car ive driven by a long shot
really depends what you want out of your car.....i dont drive the crap out of my sl because itll never be a true sports car but that doesnt mean it isnt a great street cruiser
i would not trade my sl for a 911 because the sl does everything i want it to
hope this helps a little
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG



