SL/R230: Is Mercedes the place to spend $150,000?




Is Mercedes the place to spend $150,000 plus? I know all cars have their problems but my question is, should we expect more from Mercedes when there is a problem? I say yes.
When I went to see the DB9 that I ordered but decided not to take for the SL600, I was amazed at the service area.
Let me give you some quick examples and differences. I do consider my Mercedes dealer a good place to take a car but here is what I have found.
1. At Mercedes, when they remove parts they pile them on the floor. I have seen cars taken apart with all the parts in stacks around the cars. At Aston Martin there are padded racks for the parts to be stored.
2. At Mercedes, they try to cover your car with whatever they can find and I can tell you, most of the things they find are filthy. At Aston Martin there are pre-made panels that cover the cars with hard plastic on the outside and felt on the inside.
3. At Mercedes they couldn't care less about how they touch your car. At Aston Martin they put on gloves before they touch your car.
4. At Mercedes if they go out of their way, they think they are doing you a favor. At Aston Martin they go out of their way to make you happy as part of their normal course of business. I remember the day when I was thinking about buying either a Mercedes or an Aston this last time and I called both dealers when I landed at the airport from a trip. I called the Mercedes general manager to talk to him and was told he was on the phone. Within an hour, I tried to get in touch with him and after 3 calls, I gave up. When I called the Aston Martin manager, he immediately answered even though he was in a meeting and the first thing he asked me was how my day was going. When I told him I had just arrived at the airport he asked me if I wanted someone to pick me up and take me home and he was genuine.
5. When I complain to someone about anything at Mercedes they do the best they can to help me at the dealership but are at the mercy of the manufacturer and that renders them useless. At Aston Martin when I had questions, I was put on the phone with the Executive Vice President of Sales for the US market and he spent 30 minutes with me.
I don't know? Tell me I am crazy. Tell me this is all a bunch of bull but my gut tells me that Mercedes is no longer the place to buy a $150,000 plus car.
They make their money off of mass producing cars and they just do not have the time or desire to spend extra energy with the $150,000 plus buyer. It just isn't enough of their market.
Today, I took my daughters new Mustang to the Ford dealer for service. He went out of his way to take care of me and did some things that were above the ordinary. When I tipped him $20, I found the $20 on the seat when I got into the car. I went back to give it to him and he told me he can't take extra money for doing his job.
These are my thoughts. I would love to hear from others what they think.
Last edited by LovinMercedes; Feb 9, 2005 at 12:51 AM.
On great service, I usually give folks gift cards and tell them that I have a bunch to give out for advertising. It is policy at most places not to take money.
Two years ago, my dealer had great service and took care of me with no question ask. Now that the dealer have to get approval from a zone manager to replace anything. Like my wheels for example.
http://www.mercedes-benz-usa.com/index.php
Last edited by tiggerfink; Feb 9, 2005 at 01:47 AM.
I'm sure there's a world of difference between MB and Aston Martin. Yes, the DB9 is looking more and more inviting!
Is Mercedes the place to spend $150,000 plus? I know all cars have their problems but my question is, should we expect more from Mercedes when there is a problem? I say yes.
When I went to see the DB9 that I ordered but decided not to take for the SL600, I was amazed at the service area.
Let me give you some quick examples and differences. I do consider my Mercedes dealer a good place to take a car but here is what I have found.
1. At Mercedes, when they remove parts they pile them on the floor. I have seen cars taken apart with all the parts in stacks around the cars. At Aston Martin there are padded racks for the parts to be stored.
2. At Mercedes, they try to cover your car with whatever they can find and I can tell you, most of the things they find are filthy. At Aston Martin there are pre-made panels that cover the cars with hard plastic on the outside and felt on the inside.
3. At Mercedes they couldn't care less about how they touch your car. At Aston Martin they put on gloves before they touch your car.
4. At Mercedes if they go out of their way, they think they are doing you a favor. At Aston Martin they go out of their way to make you happy as part of their normal course of business. I remember the day when I was thinking about buying either a Mercedes or an Aston this last time and I called both dealers when I landed at the airport from a trip. I called the Mercedes general manager to talk to him and was told he was on the phone. Within an hour, I tried to get in touch with him and after 3 calls, I gave up. When I called the Aston Martin manager, he immediately answered even though he was in a meeting and the first thing he asked me was how my day was going. When I told him I had just arrived at the airport he asked me if I wanted someone to pick me up and take me home and he was genuine.
5. When I complain to someone about anything at Mercedes they do the best they can to help me at the dealership but are at the mercy of the manufacturer and that renders them useless. At Aston Martin when I had questions, I was put on the phone with the Executive Vice President of Sales for the US market and he spent 30 minutes with me.
I don't know? Tell me I am crazy. Tell me this is all a bunch of bull but my gut tells me that Mercedes is no longer the place to buy a $150,000 plus car.
They make their money off of mass producing cars and they just do not have the time or desire to spend extra energy with the $150,000 plus buyer. It just isn't enough of their market.
Today, I took my daughters new Mustang to the Ford dealer for service. He went out of his way to take care of me and did some things that were above the ordinary. When I tipped him $20, I found the $20 on the seat when I got into the car. I went back to give it to him and he told me he can't take extra money for doing his job.
These are my thoughts. I would love to hear from others what they think.
Lovin, i could not agree more with your comments; my parents have been buying Mercedes for the past 20 years or so. Without a doubt, their cars have had the usual quality control BS problems that Mercedes are prone to, requiring frequent trips to the dealers. As often is and has been the case they don't have parts in stock or claim to have fixed the problems, only to have them come back. Further more, when it comes time for service, they always give us crappy loaner cars and some dealers don't even have loaners- i don't think that is too much to ask from MB. While i know BMW and Lexus are different, at least they do give much better service-for example, when my dad had a small problem with his new 7 series, the salesman drove over to his house and gave him a BMW loaner, picked up his car and brought it back the next day-that's the kind of service i would expect if you are spending over a 100k on a car, but i doubt we'll see it.....
Having said that, maybe you are servicing your car at the wrong Mercedes dealer. I also live in the Bay area and have religiously taken my cars to MB of Oakland. Everyone in the dealership knows me, from the receptionist to the owner and they all go out of their way to make me feel welcome. The service department will send someone to my house to pick up my cars if needed. They frequently embarrass me by not charging me for things (not little things either- a wood shift knob for an SL, which listed for nearly $500, two satellite radios, gifts from the Mercedes collection). Now admittedly I have purchased 18 cars from them over the past six years, but I cannot imagine anyone doing better than this.
I haven't seen any other company that would make me feel more comfortable spending this kind of money on a car.
Trending Topics
Fletcher Jones of Newport has been good and they've had no trouble keeping parts in stock for my very old 420SEL. You would think it would be even easier to keep parts in stock for newer cars. They are the largest volume MB dealership in the world apparently.
If I had time I'd put up a web site for MB owners to post about their dealerships and rank them.
I've been holding off buying a SL55 since the darn car came out for the very same reasons. I don't want to get treated like dirt after spending that much money on the car and the quality sure has gone down. My last MB is a 1989 420SEL. Solid as a rock. Nothing ever went wrong with it. The quality of the work inside the car, the leather, the wood, etc., is awesome.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
But, LovinSL600--why didn't you go with your heart and not your head, and buy the DB9? It's a gorgeous shape - no matter that it doesn't have some of the SL options - and in a world where MB is looking increasingly plain (new SL's) or plain bizarre (SLR), the Aston looks better every time I see it.
Getting back to your servicing problems, I've just bought a Lexus SUV, and have been really pleased with the level of attention for both sales and servicing. It's a world away from MB and shows them up in the same way as you noted with your Aston servicing.
However there's an answer to why Lexus does so well, and it has little to do with their quest for excellence. The dealership gets a quota deducted each month and has to earn it back through customer quality control. My son is a manager at Toyota HQ so he knows, and said that it's quite considerable - sometimes over $150,000 a month retained. The dealership gets it eventually, but only by exceeding their satisfaction quota. What a great idea!
By contrast I sent my old 350SL to the local MB dealer a few years back for a pre-purchase check. They:
- left a dirty rag inside on the console.
- knocked a plug lead off so the engine missed! They must have known it was running wrong when they parked it.
- left the radio on loud so it gave me a fright when I turned the key.
- scratched the bonnet. They disputed that, but I knew every inch on that car, and the small scratches weren't there before. Something was dropped on it.
- some other stuff I've forgotten.
I complained in writing, but got little more than apologies. Maybe they didn't want to service old MBs... that's quite a common perception with dealerships who can't be bothered with the older models.
But little did they know that my late model SLK and SL500--purchased a few years later elsewhere--have never entered their doors.
I voted with my feet!
Ken Silver
--------------
~1993 SL500, glistening triple black, xenons, AMG facelift to 2002 style.
~1999 SLK 230 Kompressor, silver/black leather, CD, immaculate
~1999 Lexus LX470, sand/ivory leather.
~1999 Suzuki Grand Vitara. black & silver.
~ex 350SL, 230E, 280E, MX5, Jaguar Daimler and a lot of other makes not nearly as nice.
if you didnt buy it there, prepare to wait longer at certain dealerships to get your car back, they won't give you a loaner, etc. This is 100% BS b/c I've never had any other car dealership pull this crap.
Terrible how that works!
Contrast that with Aston Martin. When I went to the launch of DB9 at the factory, I spoke to one of the AM people about colours and options. Some months later, I went to test drive the DB9 and the same person came up and picked up the conversation from where we left off. Made me feel that they really care and what I can tell you is that there is a buzz about the place, an excitement about what they are doing which you just do not get with Mercedes or Porsche.
I am very excited about the AM V8 Vantage as new information becomes available. Ther renaissance of Aston Martin is very interesting to watch. If you can get Evo magazine, there's an excellent article on the devleopment of the new car, plus a test of the SL65 against a Murcielago and Zonda. The view is that the SL65 has more power than the chassis can hande (but we knew that anyway) and that the SL55 is the better resolved of the two cars.
Auto maker points to slumping profits at its Mercedes division.
SINDELFINGEN, Germany - Slumping profits at DaimlerChrysler AG’s Mercedes division dragged fourth-quarter earnings down 63 percent, but strong performances from the once-hurting Chrysler and commercial vehicles divisions helped full-year results
The automaker said Thursday that net profit for the October-December quarter fell to 526 million euros ($712 million), or 52 euro cents (70 cents) per share, from 1.4 billion euros, or 1.39 euros per share, in the fourth quarter of 2003.
Sales rose 7 percent to 37.7 billion euros ($51 billion) from 35.2 billion euros a year ago, boosted by the first-time inclusion of revenue from Japanese truck maker Mitsubishi Fuso.
Operating profits at Mercedes, hit by quality problems and the weak dollar, plummeted to just 20 million euros ($27 million) from 784 million euros in the fourth quarter of 2003. Fourth-quarter sales at the luxury division fell 2 percent to 12.8 billion euros ($17.4 billion) from 13 billion euros a year earlier.
Chief Executive Juergen Schrempp emphasized the company’s dissatisfaction with the state of affairs at Mercedes, and proposed a “road map” for how it intends to improve the division’s performance by 2007, including a comprehensive quality offensive and a focus on cutting costs. The company didn’t rule out job cuts at the division.
“One thing is quite clear: even without the exchange-rate effects, the operating profit of the Mercedes Car Group in the third and fourth quarters would have been unacceptable,” Schrempp said.
The fourth-quarter result was well below the 686 million euros ($878 million) profit forecast of analysts polled by Dow Jones Newswires.
DaimlerChrysler shares fell 1.5 percent 35.56 euros ($45.51) by early afternoon in Frankfurt.
Still, full-year earnings for 2004 rose significantly, with net income of 2.5 billion euros ($3.3 billion), up from 448 million euros the previous year. The full-year improvement was driven by a strong performance by the company’s U.S. Chrysler division, which has bounced bank with hot-selling new models such as the 300 and 300C.
“The improved earnings at group level are primarily due to the significant increase in operating profit at the Chrysler Group and commercial vehicles,” Schrempp said.
The weak dollar hurts Mercedes by making its products more expensive in the key U.S. market. At home, it faces increased competition from Munich-based BMW, which has launched several new models. Analysts say Mercedes’ fortunes may improve as it comes out with new products over the next year or two.
Fourth-quarter operating earnings showed the role reversal between former problem case Chrysler and Mercedes. While earnings at Mercedes nearly evaporated, Chrysler brought in 386 million euros ($523 million), compared to 143 million euros for the same period a year ago.
The commercial vehicles division, which makes trucks and buses, increased operating earnings to 437 million euros ($592 million) for the quarter, compared to 344 million euros for the same period in 2003.
The troubles at Mercedes prompted DaimlerChrysler to back off its previous optimistic assumptions about 2005.
The company said it now expects “slightly higher operating profit” in 2005, “after a weaker first and second quarter.”
At DaimlerChrysler’s shareholders meeting last April, Schrempp said he expected a “significant improvement” in 2005 and 2006 earnings on the back of new models.
Problems with the ultra-compact Smart models have also hurt Mercedes’ performance, although the company has pinned hopes on Smart’s new four-seater, which has showed strong sales since its launch last year.
Eckhard Cordes, head of the Mercedes division, said the company was working on an improved business model for Smart, which could include expanding partnerships beyond an existing agreement with Mitsubishi Motors.
“We can’t rule anything out,” Cordes said.
DaimlerChrysler’s participation in Germany’s troubled satellite-controlled truck toll system, Toll Collect, led to a charge of 472 million euros ($604) for the year. The system suffered costly setbacks before launching on New Year’s Day.
The company, based in Stuttgart and Auburn Hills, Michigan, kept its dividend unchanged at 1.50 euros ($1.92) per share.




Interesting too about HP. I have in front of me an HP-55 calculator which I bought in 1974 and still use every day, an iconic item from that period when electronics was really getting going. At the time Hewlett-Packard was simply the best name in the business.
Last edited by blueSL; Feb 10, 2005 at 10:55 PM.
Another Aston Martin plug... I was at the Birmingham motor show in UK a few month's back, and the stand with the largest number of onlookers - hour after hour - was the Aston Martin stand... crowds 20 deep all round.
The SLR, Maybach and other MB stands were considerably smaller in spectator attention.
Ken Silver
--------------
~1993 SL500, glistening triple black, xenons, AMG facelift to 2002 style.
~1999 SLK 230 Kompressor, silver/black leather, CD, immaculate
~1999 Lexus LX470, sand/ivory leather.
~1999 Suzuki Grand Vitara. black & silver.
~ex 350SL, 230E, 280E, MX5, Jaguar Daimler and a lot of other makes not nearly as nice.
The SL has poise and style - theirs looks plain ugly and drives like a boat.
Ken Silver
Last week, I posted a complaint/suggestion about the price and limitations about MB phones. A received a canned response in perfect form letter style. MB doesn't seem to give a damn and I bought two new cars and one CPO in the last four months. I may tell them to kiss my a$$ when my lease is up.
When I take my $150k MB or my $110k MB to be serviced, the give me a filthy C-class.
Just thinking about it makes me pissed. Last time I went to service, I had to go to LA (and I don't know my way around). When I asked for a car with Nav, the response was, "None of our loaners have Nav." Needless to say, I got ****IN' lost. At lease end, I may tell them to get lost.
Overseas calls don't mean much these days, but I know what you mean.
I am overseas right now and had some questions regarding the extended warranty on the SL55's and some other minor issues. I chatted with someone from Fletcher Jones Newport Beach (where I happen to get my present car serviced) and it was frustrating a hell. I even saved the chat transcript to show my friends what happened. It was so funny it became painful.
At the end of 10 mins of chatting and going in circles, I was told someone will email me. I've received two canned emails from sales agents at FJ. No answers yet .. over 4 business days have elapsed. At the end of my chat, I even mentioned to the guy that maybe I should take my business to MBLN because he just spent 10 mins going in circles with me w/o getting me an answer.
I guess my $150k isn't worth it anymore. I guess with the value of money the way it is, you have to spend $500k on a car to get questions answered.
I feel bad for MB because I'm a third generation owner. It would be sad if that trend ended now.
Last week, I posted a complaint/suggestion about the price and limitations about MB phones. A received a canned response in perfect form letter style. MB doesn't seem to give a damn and I bought two new cars and one CPO in the last four months. I may tell them to kiss my a$$ when my lease is up.
When I take my $150k MB or my $110k MB to be serviced, the give me a filthy C-class.
Just thinking about it makes me pissed. Last time I went to service, I had to go to LA (and I don't know my way around). When I asked for a car with Nav, the response was, "None of our loaners have Nav." Needless to say, I got ****IN' lost. At lease end, I may tell them to get lost.



