SL/R232: Comments on SL63 from German Autopress
I was able to download a digital copy.
The overall rating was 4 Stars and they loved the overall look, the comfort, the performance and handling.
There were only a few noteworthy negative comments:
1 - with the roof up, at speeds above 100 kmh (60 mph) there was distinct wind noise.
2 - in town when dawdling about or during slow take off there was a very noticeable hesitation, delay and jerking.
3 - the fuel consumption during their test was quite heavy
Reading the article I do believe this test was done in California and therefore quite a long time ago and I hope they found a solution specifically for the wind noise.
Fahrkomfort
Last edited by Tifoso48; Sep 3, 2022 at 05:10 PM. Reason: did not print as intended
I was able to download a digital copy.
The overall rating was 4 Stars and they loved the overall look, the comfort, the performance and handling.
There were only a few noteworthy negative comments:
1 - with the roof up, at speeds above 100 kmh (60 mph) there was distinct wind noise.
2 - in town when dawdling about or during slow take off there was a very noticeable hesitation, delay and jerking.
3 - the fuel consumption during their test was quite heavy
Reading the article I do believe this test was done in California and therefore quite a long time ago and I hope they found a solution specifically for the wind noise.
I had hoped that the car they had been testing was an exception, regretfully it does not appear that way.
Right one the dot - at 60 mph - there was very distinct and noticeable wind noise on the driver's side where the window meets the roof - and yes the window was closed properly. I did not feel any strong wind penetration but the noise was definitely there and because I was focused on it, it became quite annoying.
I would think this is a systemic problem and therefore for MB to solve rather than driving my dealer nuts, however, I will speak to the dealership service manager to escalate this to MB in looking for a solution.
Do you think that is the best approach or should I contact MB directly? I have the contact information for the SL product manager.
Fahrkomfort
Here are plus and minus summary from this article:
I apologize for all the links that are showing up - no idea why they are there and can't make them go away!
[img]blob:https://mbworld.org/ae4ebc27-3e8f-46fd-afab-77256a9d1e25[/img]+ –
excellent ergonomics, good amount of cabin space provides feeling of solidity
storage in the trunk is augmented by emergency seats
in general high quality of materials with some unworthy exceptions
some of the operations are overly complicated and there are some lapses in the finishing quality
+ clear, precise and pleasantly weighty steering and high level of agility
relaxed straight line driving, unwavering tractio
+ only brute force can cause the car to lose its composure; excellent brakes and high quality and complex lighting systems
+ seats which would do equally well in your living room or your office, excellent suspensi
Sicherheit
– wind noises ( with roof closed)
+ incredibly strong with emotional sound v8 Bi-turbo, very nimble transmissiuon
[img]blob:https://mbworld.org/cc9dece5-2ba9-4872-bf69-63b7bf56712f[/img]
– jerky drive at low speed
Umwelt
-- high fuel consumption during test period l
+ generously equipped with standard options
[img]blob:https://mbworld.org/2d5a83ad-2693-49d1-bb8c-9a9a43c79a42[/img]
Last edited by Tifoso48; Sep 5, 2022 at 01:55 PM. Reason: odd reproduction of what I typed
Trending Topics




Perhaps if Christian Gebhardt could do a review
Last edited by Wolfman; Sep 6, 2022 at 01:36 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Good driving position, feels solid; feels larger than it is due to sitting low being necessary to get that good driving position, with high sills and long hood, and the ever-present thuggish V8 contributes to that feeling. Definitely more GT/muscle car than sports car...nothing at all like a 911. Having now spent 3k miles with MB's I-6/48v system, I really think it would have been a better drivetrain; the old V8 with MCT is antiquated, with the "jerky driving" mentioned above not befitting a sophisticated roadster.
Steering is good; relaxed when in traffic, but quick to change direction due to the rear steering. Wanted to respect the break-in so did not take it over 4k RPM, and unfortunately was nowhere near a highway to test wind noise.
Interior quality and materials to me were excellent and appropriate for a $150k car, with two glaring exceptions: The optional Dinamica headliner does not include the sunvisors, so they are plain plastic, and the headliner does not go to the base of the C-pillar, leaving a gap through which roof mechanicals can be seen. On a short drive, the screen was nothing but annoying in appearance, not at all intuitive, and a sea of fingerprints. Yes, integration and UI could have been much better. Even just raising/lowering the top, with the swipe and hold on the screen, will of course leave a big smudge mark across it every time. So stupid. That said, great to see the US lawyers allowed the windows and top to be lowered while approaching it with the remote.
Did not look in the trunk; utility was not a concern.
None of the criticisms are deal breakers, IMO. Overall, it's a nice car and very much a Mercedes SL regardless of what the R231 owners think; looks great, even (especially?) in Obsidian Black contrary to what people have judged from photos on here, and with either of the mesh spoke wheel options. Drives well, comfortable enough as a GT cruiser, and is no doubt very fast with the big lump under the hood and AWD, and I am sure very capable on a twisty road with the 4WS. But did not take it home because of dealer shenanigans.









Last edited by BLAM; Sep 10, 2022 at 12:01 PM.


