SL/R232: $40,000 off with conquest on the sl63 pretty insane
It's unfortunate to see that the SL63 sell so poorly.
thus inflating the price even higher, beyond reach… and here we are: Too many 2022’s now sitting on Canadian lots with the 2024 order guides around the corner.
In 2021, the outgoing SL63 model started at $170. What makes this new one worth $45k more? What makes it worth 40k more than a new BMW M8 cabriolet?
I think it’s a beautiful car and I’d like to buy one but the price is just way too high. Maybe an SL55 if they decide to bring it to Canada one day.
Last edited by van_rider; Jun 13, 2023 at 01:32 AM.
Last edited by spyderman; Jun 13, 2023 at 03:12 AM.
Mercedes did misprice this car and the market has spoken. This situation is not unlike what happened with the GTS/GTC/GTR pre COVID a number of years ago where new cars were being dumped for $50k+ off list late in the year. This is turn killed the resale market.
Last edited by big_willy; Jun 13, 2023 at 08:17 AM.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




The SL63 obviously has twin scroll turbos unlike the AMG GT models but I am still surprised that the power output is so low with that much hardware. The same engine with twin scroll turbos in the E63s was already over 600HP 6 years ago.
Hard to imagine that AMG detuned this engine down to 469hp in the SL55 without stripping it down.
The SL63 obviously has twin scroll turbos unlike the AMG GT models but I am still surprised that the power output is so low with that much hardware. The same engine with twin scroll turbos in the E63s was already over 600HP 6 years ago.
Hard to imagine that AMG detuned this engine down to 469hp in the SL55 without stripping it down.




1. The MSRP was too high
2. The overall design and engineering have questionable appeal to actual clients, especially long time SL buyers Why ask previous buyers when MB knows exactly what consumers want?
3. MB's arrogance has finally caught up---------see #1 and 2 above
It's probably safe to conclude the initial feeding frenzy with $50K over MSRP is over, way over. The discounts will create havoc on resale.




1. The MSRP was too high
2. The overall design and engineering have questionable appeal to actual clients, especially long time SL buyers Why ask previous buyers when MB knows exactly what consumers want?
3. MB's arrogance has finally caught up---------see #1 and 2 above
It's probably safe to conclude the initial feeding frenzy with $50K over MSRP is over, way over. The discounts will create havoc on resale.
1. The MSRP was too high
2. The overall design and engineering have questionable appeal to actual clients, especially long time SL buyers Why ask previous buyers when MB knows exactly what consumers want?
3. MB's arrogance has finally caught up---------see #1 and 2 above
It's probably safe to conclude the initial feeding frenzy with $50K over MSRP is over, way over. The discounts will create havoc on resale.
but the geniuses ar MB marketing and distribution should all be fired for gross incompetence. As a result of their failures we are dealing with an over abundance of vehicles and declining values.




but the geniuses ar MB marketing and distribution should all be fired for gross incompetence. As a result of their failures we are dealing with an over abundance of vehicles and declining values.








If "Longtime SL buyers were also not the target audience at all with the new car.", what was the target???? Conquest sales would seem to be more difficult than previous consumers who already wrote a check or checks.
My first SL purchase was in 1986. I have many friends that are SL fans. I never met ANYONE that was a subject of MB SL market research. We here in the USA even have less color options! Do we matter?
The SL has been a MB icon since 1954...........is the R232 also treated with such reverence???




That said, to your point it would be difficult if they change their mind mid-stream, so it is difficult to understand why they were trailing in their planning. COVID, missing chips/parts? This already started at the official launch in CA.
Last edited by Wolfman; Jun 27, 2023 at 01:32 PM.




If "Longtime SL buyers were also not the target audience at all with the new car.", what was the target???? Conquest sales would seem to be more difficult than previous consumers who already wrote a check or checks.
My first SL purchase was in 1986. I have many friends that are SL fans. I never met ANYONE that was a subject of MB SL market research. We here in the USA even have less color options! Do we matter?
The SL has been a MB icon since 1954...........is the R232 also treated with such reverence???
One can clearly argue that the roll out of this car was poorly handled. However, to try and reboot the model line to appeal to younger buyers (hell, that ain't me, I'll be 65 in less than two weeks) was, IMHO, rational and reasonable. The SL had an aging fan base; trying to appeal to 911 buyers was a natural goal, even if it is very difficult to achieve. All I can say is it worked for me. (Except the young part, I'm powerless to change that
)
Last edited by drgek; Jun 26, 2023 at 09:34 PM.




One can clearly argue that the roll out of this car was poorly handled. However, to try and reboot the model line to appeal to younger buyers (hell, that ain't me, I'll be 65 in less than two weeks) was, IMHO, rational and reasonable. The SL had an aging fan base; trying to appeal to 911 buyers was a natural goal, even if it is very difficult to achieve. All I can say is it worked for me. (Except the young part, I'm powerless to change that
)



