SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Gallardo any one?
* you wouldnt want the gallardo to blow you to pieces when you hit the start engine button would you?




I have had a 2006 Gallardo Coupe for several months now and the car is simply stunning. Everywhere I go the car gets lots of attention and compliments. The other cars you mentioned are great cars, you cant go wrong with any of them. My G is egear, (which I recommend) so it doenst fly off the line unless I do a performance launch which isnt so great for the car.
From a roll the Gallardo (2006+) is pretty powerful. The comparison is a 520 HP, 3500 pound car, vs a 604 HP, 4500 pound car. The Gallardo's acceleration is pretty close to my SL600, although the SL600 feels a lot faster due to it's, kick you in the butt, torque. Traction is also never an issue in the G, whereas that yellow warning light is on all the time in my SL600.
So the SL65 may be a little bit quicker, but the Gallardo handles better, brakes better, and sounds better. In my opinion The SL65 is unbeatable in terms of luxury, performance, class, and driveability. The Gallardo's quality (and the Murcis) is top notch and Lambos are not that expensive to service.
Hope this information helps
Aaron
I have had a 2006 Gallardo Coupe for several months now and the car is simply stunning. Everywhere I go the car gets lots of attention and compliments. The other cars you mentioned are great cars, you cant go wrong with any of them. My G is egear, (which I recommend) so it doenst fly off the line unless I do a performance launch which isnt so great for the car.
From a roll the Gallardo (2006+) is pretty powerful. The comparison is a 520 HP, 3500 pound car, vs a 604 HP, 4500 pound car. The Gallardo's acceleration is pretty close to my SL600, although the SL600 feels a lot faster due to it's, kick you in the butt, torque. Traction is also never an issue in the G, whereas that yellow warning light is on all the time in my SL600.
So the SL65 may be a little bit quicker, but the Gallardo handles better, brakes better, and sounds better. In my opinion The SL65 is unbeatable in terms of luxury, performance, class, and driveability. The Gallardo's quality (and the Murcis) is top notch and Lambos are not that expensive to service.
Hope this information helps
Aaron
Trending Topics
My guess is The SL600 will slowly walk away from the Gallardo, but it wont be very dramatic. I have never actually raced the Gallardo and the SL600 side by side, however, I have raced the Gallardo and Murci side by side from 50 - 100, and they were fairly close with the Murci pulling very slowly ahead. I have also raced the Murci and the SL600 side by side from 30 to 80 and they were nearly dead even. I even got identical 0-60 times with the Murci and SL600 with my driftbox/gtech. I hope to get a side by side comparison of the Gallardo and the SL600 from 30-80 or so soon.
The clutch issues were early Gallardo (pre 2006) problems as far as I know. Having egear really helps minimize any clutch issues as well. I havent had to have either my Gallardo or my Murci (which I traded for my Gallardo) in the shop at all. Keep in mind that I only put like 1000 miles on the Murci while I had it and about 900 on the Gallardo.
Bottom line is, the cars are so different they can barely be compared to one another. I would not give up your SL65 for a Gallardo, but it would make a very nice addition if that's your plan.
Aaron
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
My guess is The SL600 will slowly walk away from the Gallardo, but it wont be very dramatic. I have never actually raced the Gallardo and the SL600 side by side, however, I have raced the Gallardo and Murci side by side from 50 - 100, and they were fairly close with the Murci pulling very slowly ahead. I have also raced the Murci and the SL600 side by side from 30 to 80 and they were nearly dead even. I even got identical 0-60 times with the Murci and SL600 with my driftbox/gtech. I hope to get a side by side comparison of the Gallardo and the SL600 from 30-80 or so soon.
The clutch issues were early Gallardo (pre 2006) problems as far as I know. Having egear really helps minimize any clutch issues as well. I havent had to have either my Gallardo or my Murci (which I traded for my Gallardo) in the shop at all. Keep in mind that I only put like 1000 miles on the Murci while I had it and about 900 on the Gallardo.
Bottom line is, the cars are so different they can barely be compared to one another. I would not give up your SL65 for a Gallardo, but it would make a very nice addition if that's your plan.
Aaron



I myself would take an SL65 over a Gallardo any day. I would then save up for an F430 or Ford GT with twin turbos. Just my opinion.




Having a choice of Gallardo with a small discount vs 430 with $50k (or more)mark-up is no brainer....
Unless you can get one at MSRP.....
SL65 depreciation is a lot worse than the Gallardo. MSRP Gallardo's prices have been raised a lot since 2004. There have also been substantial improvements from 2004 to 2006+. 2004 Gallardos that were less brand new than 2005 SL65s still command more money than 2005 SL65s.
Also, don't forget that Lamborghini will be upping the horsepower and updating the Gallardo soon, like maybe next year. I'm hearing 600 horsepower with other mild updates. That would make the zero to 60 MPH dash drop from 3.9 to 4.0 seconds down to mid 3's.
I drove a manual Gallardo (and a 550hp SL55...), and I know the Gallardo was definitely the better handling car. It was also really quick and overall great car to drive.
I think the 430's a much better looking vehicle tho'.



