SL55 AMG, SL63 AMG, SL65 AMG (R230) 2002 - 2011 (2003 US for SL55 and 2004 for the SL65)

SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Kelley Blue Book Hammering the SL65

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-24-2007, 11:26 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Speed Thrills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kelley Blue Book Hammering the SL65

From past experience KBB usually is a tad high with values across the board, so I was shocked to see the Private Party value for a 2006 Loaded SL65 with 4k miles on it in excellent condition to be $117k. Did this just recently get hit again from the release of the 09 SL face lift? I can't imagine being the owner of an 07 SL65 and seeing over a 40% drop in value as soon as the tires leave the dealer's lot.
Old 04-24-2007, 11:38 AM
  #2  
Super Member
 
BiTurboAmg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL65 AMG
yeah it does suck and that is just the way it goes. When do you pick up your sl65?
Old 04-24-2007, 12:08 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Speed Thrills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BiTurboAmg
yeah it does suck and that is just the way it goes. When do you pick up your sl65?
Inspection should be done any day and then it's off to me. I have to admit it looks like the 09 face lift is very similar to the current model so I'm not too bothered by it. Best thing is the 65 engine will stay the same which is most important anyway. Would be comparable to the F430 coming out with the same engine as the 360.
Old 04-24-2007, 01:07 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Blk04cobra1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2002 S430, 2004 Cobra, 2004 Tahoe
I agree that it would be a shock, but do people who buy these 65's really intend to sell it within a year? I would think they'd hold on to them for a couple of years, but I could be wrong.
Old 04-26-2007, 08:59 AM
  #5  
Member
 
NOTA4RE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Upstate NY, Ponte Vedra FL
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL55, Cayenne S, Tundra, 360 spider
depreciation only matters to those who can't afford it.

Sometimes I wonder how or if you guys enjoy your cars.
Old 04-26-2007, 09:20 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jbondox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cleveland Ohio
Posts: 2,430
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
beater with a heater
wow, it seems as soon as you drive it off the lot, it is $60k less. I wonder what the reasoning is?
Old 04-26-2007, 09:24 AM
  #7  
NSM
Member
 
NSM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL65
These cars are not an investment, they are a toy to use and abuse often. I drive the **** out of mine and won't be selling it any time soon. I really don't care about the depreciation.
Old 04-26-2007, 10:05 AM
  #8  
Member
 
NOTA4RE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Upstate NY, Ponte Vedra FL
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL55, Cayenne S, Tundra, 360 spider
Originally Posted by NSM
These cars are not an investment, they are a toy to use and abuse often. I drive the **** out of mine and won't be selling it any time soon. I really don't care about the depreciation.
+1
Old 04-26-2007, 10:28 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ItalianStallion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
R35 GT-R, EvoX
It all depends on the buyer's financial position.

An SL65 could be a daily driver which the owner may want to switch in a year or two. If thats the case then it sucks to lose $70k+ instantly.

I agree that if its your weekend toy then who really cares.
Old 04-26-2007, 11:48 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Speed Thrills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NOTA4RE
depreciation only matters to those who can't afford it.

Sometimes I wonder how or if you guys enjoy your cars.
Buying mine at $120k so I'll be enjoying it just fine thnx.
Old 04-26-2007, 12:03 PM
  #11  
Member
 
eugeneC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W221
Originally Posted by NSM
These cars are not an investment, they are a toy to use and abuse often. I drive the **** out of mine and won't be selling it any time soon. I really don't care about the depreciation.
+1 Can't agree more
Old 04-26-2007, 12:19 PM
  #12  
Out Of Control!!
 
JRAMGV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 10,574
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
1999 C280 Previous / 2008 E350
Man 40% is alot....
Old 04-26-2007, 10:42 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
m_berman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
06 CLS55 w/ P030, 05 Jag S Type R, 05 TBird-68 Dodge Charger R/T-440 w/4speed I'm original owner
I came across a way to minimize the depreciation after purchase.

I came across a way to minimize the depreciation after purchase.

Extend the curb distance from the lot to the other side of the earth. It would take some time to leave the dealer's lot.

It sounds like private party sales might prevail on such a deep depreciation factor. I would take it off someone hands for 114K + some.
Old 04-29-2007, 04:04 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,546
Received 1,066 Likes on 855 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
07 SL65 and seeing over a 40% drop in value as soon as the tires leave the dealer's lot.
A know a guy who just purchased a used '07 SL65 for 130,000. Get this, it had less than 500 miles on the odometer. That's some serious depreciation.
Old 04-29-2007, 04:59 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AdamG@NorCal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fremont, Ca
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EVOTECH Mercedes AMG
Originally Posted by BlownV8
A know a guy who just purchased a used '07 SL65 for 130,000. Get this, it had less than 500 miles on the odometer. That's some serious depreciation.
O-U-C-H...

To think the SL 65 is in the second luxurious tier after the SLR for the Mercedes brand...
Old 04-29-2007, 06:00 PM
  #16  
JLP
Super Member
 
JLP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 E-55-95-F355S- 99 Porsche 911 C2 w mods
LOL......Thats not bad considering CL65's have lost over a $100,000 in the same time period!
Old 04-29-2007, 09:29 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
DFW01E55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,566
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
'14 ML BT
Originally Posted by NOTA4RE
depreciation only matters to those who can't afford it.
Wow, I'm so busted!

My CL55 dropped 17k retail in 12 months.

I hate this because, #1 I'm cheap and #2 I'm cheap.

Can I afford it - marginally yes, but I still hate it.

Having said that, I do hammer the crap out of it whenever I can because it brings me pleasure - which does not seem to depreciate!
Old 04-29-2007, 11:59 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
m_berman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
06 CLS55 w/ P030, 05 Jag S Type R, 05 TBird-68 Dodge Charger R/T-440 w/4speed I'm original owner
Originally Posted by BlownV8
A know a guy who just purchased a used '07 SL65 for 130,000. Get this, it had less than 500 miles on the odometer. That's some serious depreciation.

That buys is one lucky dude!
Old 05-01-2007, 09:06 PM
  #19  
Member
 
NOTA4RE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Upstate NY, Ponte Vedra FL
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL55, Cayenne S, Tundra, 360 spider
Originally Posted by JLP
LOL......Thats not bad considering CL65's have lost over a $100,000 in the same time period!
\

Yeah...because the top doesn't fold into the trunk.
Old 05-02-2007, 04:45 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Tuskir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by jbondox
wow, it seems as soon as you drive it off the lot, it is $60k less. I wonder what the reasoning is?
The reasoning is that SL65 (or any 65 for that matter) is not worth its 185,000$ MSRP. It is overpriced to begin with, so it depreciates so fast.
Old 05-02-2007, 06:02 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Murtaza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63S coupe, X5M
Originally Posted by Tuskir
The reasoning is that SL65 (or any 65 for that matter) is not worth its 185,000$ MSRP. It is overpriced to begin with, so it depreciates so fast.
Not really true. If they built less, they would hold value a lot better. For a 604hp supercar, MB builds way too many.
Old 05-02-2007, 07:42 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Speed Thrills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Murtaza
Not really true. If they built less, they would hold value a lot better. For a 604hp supercar, MB builds way too many.
True, and I think they shouldnt have had the 600 so similar to the 65. 600 is basically a detuned 65 and for quite a bit less with more options standard. Yes, it doesnt have the AMG sticker which for many is worth a premium alone and the AMG upgrades. All and all if they did reduce the units they would hold a lot better.
Old 05-02-2007, 08:07 PM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Addicted2Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lotus Elise SLK55
You can't just blame the supply for the depreciation. SL55 doesn't depreciate as fast as SL65 and there are far more of them. The main problem is that SL65 costs as much or more than many exotic sports car. 185,000$ MSRP is higher than Lambo Gallardo, Ferrari F430, Ford GT, Aston Martin DB9, and much higher than Porsche 997TT. And like Speed Thrills said, SL600 is nearly as fast and costs far less. Actually if you chip SL600, it makes more power and is faster than SL65.
Old 05-03-2007, 03:47 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Mad TKD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its all about demand. I am sure if you pull a inventory of new SL65s up there would be plenty of 06 models sitting around. Then factor the lease turn ins on these cars also. They are not moving fast enough simple as that.
Old 05-03-2007, 11:43 AM
  #25  
Banned
 
bltserv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irvine, CA.
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 SL55, 2000 CL500
Depreciation and SL`s

I had a "Freind" remind me how much my
SL55 was depreciating. He is a Mortgage guy down on his luck
with a 3 series BMer. "Bet its lost 20 grand in the year you have had it."

I told him.
I love my AMG and I can afford it.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Kelley Blue Book Hammering the SL65



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:29 AM.