SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Dyno chart - SL 65 stock
05-08-2007, 08:38 PM
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Dyno chart - SL 65 stock
EuroElites dyno-ed a SL 65 today.
Here is the dyno chart for a stock SL 65.
Gas: 91 premium 76
Miles: roughly 4k
Here is the dyno chart for a stock SL 65.
Gas: 91 premium 76
Miles: roughly 4k
Last edited by AdamG@NorCal; 05-08-2007 at 11:31 PM.
05-08-2007, 11:06 PM
#7
Super Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 511
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'11/E63-Former car: '05 RT4 E55, Sprintbooster, Phenolic Spacers, RT IC /Secondary HE & BMC Filters
Trending Topics
673TQ!!!
05-09-2007, 10:06 AM
#16
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SL65
Hot weather hindered the hp numbers. Bad air day...
Looks lean to 3500 then a little fat. Is it intentionally fat from the factory at high revs for cooling to reduce detonation or is that just programming error???
Looks lean to 3500 then a little fat. Is it intentionally fat from the factory at high revs for cooling to reduce detonation or is that just programming error???
05-09-2007, 11:54 AM
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05-09-2007, 03:29 PM
#18
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05 SL 55 AMG, 01 Turbusa/8.43 @ 183..1/4 mi.
Impressive..........
If I can get my puny -55 even close to 500 RWHP, I'll be happy......................torque on the -65 is just off-the-scale.
The -55 just does not have enuf cylinders/boost to get close to 700 ft. lbs, the -65 is a very nice car, IMO.
If I can get my puny -55 even close to 500 RWHP, I'll be happy......................torque on the -65 is just off-the-scale.
The -55 just does not have enuf cylinders/boost to get close to 700 ft. lbs, the -65 is a very nice car, IMO.
Last edited by SuperDave; 05-09-2007 at 03:31 PM.
05-09-2007, 04:51 PM
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Cali heat+Cali 91 octane= just fair numbers. These intercoolers are super efficient and these dyno numbers dont do the car justice, under real world conditions when the air is moving properly the car works like magic.
05-09-2007, 05:23 PM
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
The temperature on yesterday's dyno was 100 degrees. This is actually quite GOOD.
SL 65 Specs
MSRP$186,775*
EngineAMG-built twin-turbocharged 6.0L SOHC 36-valve V-12 engine
Net Power 604 hp @ 4,800 rpm
Net Torque 738 lb-ft @ 2,000 - 4,000 rpm
SL 65 Specs
MSRP$186,775*
EngineAMG-built twin-turbocharged 6.0L SOHC 36-valve V-12 engine
Net Power 604 hp @ 4,800 rpm
Net Torque 738 lb-ft @ 2,000 - 4,000 rpm
05-09-2007, 05:28 PM
#23
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 SL65
hi adam...
i guess i just don't know enough about power generation and delivery to understand why those dyno numbers are good relative to the specs.
regardless, my SL65 has torque to spare, so i have no complaints about it.
regardless, my SL65 has torque to spare, so i have no complaints about it.
05-09-2007, 05:46 PM
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
The HP is a bit on the soft side understandable for the heat involved and the crappy 91 octane gas, im actually surprised it made that much....but the torque is above spec which im sure is rated at 93oct+
05-09-2007, 06:01 PM
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would assume a ECU/TCU tune would only affect 1/4 mile times as traction is already an issue with the 65. Do you know the real world 0-60 and 1/4 mile gains with that tune?
